Wet Mars: Red Planet Lost Ocean's Worth of Water, New Maps Reveal
New maps of water in the atmosphere of Mars reveal that the Red Planet might once have had enough to cover up to a fifth of the planet, researchers say.
Further research to refine these maps could help guide the quest to identify underground reservoirs on Mars, the scientists added. A new NASA video describes the ancient ocean on Mars.
Although the Martian surface is now cold and dry, there is plenty of evidence suggesting that rivers, lakes and seas covered the Red Planet billions of years ago. Since there is life virtually wherever there is liquid water on Earth, some researchers have suggested that life might have evolved on Mars when it was wet, and life could be there even now, hidden in subterranean aquifers. [The Search for Water on Mars in Photos]
Much remains unknown about how Mars lost its water and how much liquid water might remain in underground reservoirs. One way to solve these mysteries is to analyze the kinds of water molecules in the Martian atmosphere.
Normally, water molecules are each made up of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. However, one or both of these hydrogen atoms can be replaced with deuterium atoms to create deuterated water. (Deuterium, like hydrogen, has one proton, but also one neutron.)
Deuterated water is heavier than normal water, so it behaves differently. For example, it can be easier for normal water to escape Mars, since it can vaporize more easily in the Martian atmosphere. Solar radiation can break this water up into hydrogen and oxygen, and the hydrogen can then escape into space.
By studying the current ratio of deuterium to hydrogen in Martian water, researchers suggested they could estimate how much total water the Red Planet used to have. They constructed new maps of the ratio between hydrogen and deuterium in the water in the Martian atmosphere using data gathered from 2008 to 2014 by the Very Large Telescope in Chile, and the Keck Observatory and NASA's InfraRed Telescope Facility in Hawaii.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
They found the ratio between deuterated water and normal water in some regions of Mars was higher than thought, typically seven times higher than in Earth's oceans. This high ratio suggests that Mars has lost a great deal of water over time.
"We can now get a pretty strong estimate of how much water was lost on the planet," lead study author Geronimo Villanueva, a planetary scientist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland,told Space.com.
Based on their findings, the scientists estimate that Mars might have had enough water to cover up to 20 percent of the planet about 4.5 billion years ago. They suggest the Red Planet could still possess substantial underground reservoirs of water.
Further refining maps of atmospheric water on Mars could help guide the search for these deep aquifers, Villanueva said. One would essentially look at such maps to see how much known sources of water such as Martian ice caps could account for this atmospheric water, "and any abnormalities might be released from hidden reservoirs," he said.
The scientists detailed their findings online today (March 5) in the journal Science.
Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Charles Q. Choi is a contributing writer for Space.com and Live Science. He covers all things human origins and astronomy as well as physics, animals and general science topics. Charles has a Master of Arts degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia, School of Journalism and a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of South Florida. Charles has visited every continent on Earth, drinking rancid yak butter tea in Lhasa, snorkeling with sea lions in the Galapagos and even climbing an iceberg in Antarctica. Visit him at http://www.sciwriter.us