Expert Voices

Asteroids in the solar system could contain undiscovered, superheavy elements

a shiny asteroid hangs in the darkness of space with a faint sun in the distance.
An illustration of an asteroid orbiting through space. (Image credit: Mark Garlick/Science Photo Library via Getty Images)

For centuries, the quest for new elements was a driving force in many scientific disciplines. Understanding an atom’s structure and the development of nuclear science allowed scientists to accomplish the old goal of alchemists – turning one element into another.

Over the past few decades, scientists in the United States, Germany and Russia have figured out how to use special tools to combine two atomic nuclei and create new, superheavy elements.

The heaviest element on the periodic table has 118 protons. (Image credit: Humdan/Shutterstock)

These heavy elements usually aren’t stable. Heavier elements have more protons, or positively charged particles in the nucleus; some that scientists have created have up to 118. With that many protons, the electromagnetic repulsive forces between protons in the atomic nuclei overwhelm the attractive nuclear force that keeps the nucleus together.

Scientists have predicted for a long time that elements with around 164 protons could have a relatively long half-life, or even be stable. They call this the “island of stability” – here, the attractive nuclear force is strong enough to balance out any electromagnetic repulsion.

Scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have constructed experiments that can weigh superheavy elements. (Image credit: Marilyn Chung, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

Since heavy elements are difficult to make in the lab, physicists like me have been looking for these elements everywhere, even beyond the Earth. To narrow down the search, we need to know what sort of natural processes could produce these elements. We also need to know what properties they have, like their mass densities.

Calculating density

From the outset, my team wanted to figure out the mass density of these superheavy elements. This property could tell us more about how the atomic nuclei of these elements behave. And once we had an idea about their density, we could get a better sense of where these elements might be hiding.

To figure out the mass density and other chemical properties of these elements, my research team used a model that represents an atom of each of these heavy elements as a single, charged cloud. This model works well for large atoms, particularly metals that are laid out in a lattice structure.

We first applied this model to atoms with known densities and calculated their chemical properties. Once we knew it worked, we used the model to calculate the density of elements with 164 protons, and other elements in this island of stability.

Based on our calculations, we expect stable metals with atomic numbers around 164 to have densities between 36 to 68 g/cm3 (21 to 39 oz/in3). However, in our calculations, we used a conservative assumption about the mass of atomic nuclei. It’s possible that the actual range is up to 40% higher.

Asteroids and heavy elements

Many scientists believe that gold and other heavy metals were deposited on Earth’s surface after asteroids collided with the planet.

The same thing could have happened with these superheavy elements, but super mass dense heavy elements sink into ground and are eliminated from near the Earth’s surface by the subduction of tectonic plates. However, while researchers might not find superheavy elements on Earth’s surface, they could still be in asteroids like the ones that might have brought them to this planet.

Scientists have estimated that some asteroids have mass densities greater than that of osmium (22.59 g/cm3, 13.06 oz/in3), the densest element found on Earth.

The largest of these objects is asteroid 33, which is nicknamed Polyhymnia and has a calculated density of 75.3 g/cm3 (43.5 oz/in3). But this density might not be quite right, since it’s quite difficult to measure the mass and volume of far-away asteroids.

Polyhymnia isn’t the only dense asteroid out there. In fact, there’s a whole class of superheavy objects, including asteroids, which could contain these superheavy elements. Some time ago, I introduced the name Compact Ultradense Objects, or CUDOs, for this class.

In a study published in October 2023 in the European Physical Journal Plus, my team suggested some of the CUDOs orbiting in the solar system might still contain some of these dense, heavy elements in their cores. Their surfaces would have accumulated normal matter over time and would appear normal to a distant observer.

So how are these heavy elements produced? Some extreme astronomical events, like double star mergers could be hot and dense enough to produce stable superheavy elements.

Some of the superheavy material could then remain on board asteroids created in these events. They could stay packed in these asteroids, which orbit the solar system for billions of years.

Looking to the future

The European Space Agency’s Gaia mission aims to create the largest, most precise three-dimensional map of everything in the sky. Researchers could use these extremely precise results to study the motion of asteroids and figure out which ones might have an unusually large density.

Space missions are being conducted to collect material from the surfaces of asteroids and analyze them back on Earth. Both NASA and the Japanese state space agency JAXA have targeted low density near-Earth asteroids with success. Just this month, NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission brought back a sample. Though the sample analysis is just getting started, there is a very small chance it could harbor dust containing superheavy elements accumulated over billions of years.

The Psyche spacecraft has left Earth. It will use the gravitational field of Mars to carry it closer to the asteroid. It will then orbit the asteroid and collect data.  (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

One mass-dense dust and rock sample brought back to Earth would be enough. NASA’s Psyche mission, which launched in October 2023, will fly to and sample a metal-rich asteroid with a greater chance of harboring superheavy elements. More asteroid missions like this will help scientists better understand the properties of asteroids orbiting in the solar system.

Learning more about asteroids and exploring potential sources of superheavy elements will help scientists continue the century-spanning quest to characterize the matter that makes up the universe and better understand how objects in the solar system formed.

Evan LaForge, an undergraduate student studying physics and mathematics, is the lead author on this research and helped with the writing of this article, along with Will Price, a physics graduate student.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Johann Rafelski
Professor of Physics, University of Arizona

The study of strange particle signatures of deconfined quark-gluon plasma formed in relativistic heavy ion collisions; the formation of matter out of quark-gluon plasma in hadronization processes in the laboratory and in the early Universe; The vacuum structure in the presence of strong fields, and the related topics in positron plasma physics; the ascent of ultra short, ultra intense laser light pulses as a new tool in this domain of physics, and the related new research opportunities involving exploration of the inertial force in the presence of critical acceleration; Applications to high energy particle production; Astroparticle physics as related to dark matter, dark energy, neutrino cosmic background and new cosmic objects within the standard model of particle physics and applications of strong field physics in Astrophysics. Current work on novel approaches to aneutronic nuclear fusion at intermediate plasma density; Past contributions to neural net modeling and artificial intelligence.

  • Alan Sailer
    Its a very creative theory but there is no evidence (other than asteroid density) to support it.

    First, we have lots of samples from asteroids in our meteorite collection. There have been no findings of any super heavy transuranic elements. None. How could a segregation mechanism create one super heavy asteroid composed mostly of super-heavy element and but have no trace of them in any other sample?

    Second, the Earth itself was formed from the same reservoir of dust and debris. No super heavy elements.

    Third, another asteroid has been found with super high density. This density was later shown to be inaccurate from further measurements. Rather than theorize such an exotic solution we need to wait for further data that I predict will show the density is explainable with conventional elements.

    I also predict the Bennu sample will show only conventional elements. It's a C class asteroid which
    are already found in existing meteorites in our collections

    Cheers.
    Reply
  • Galumph
    Alan Sailer said:
    Its a very creative theory but there is no evidence (other than asteroid density) to support it.

    First, we have lots of samples from asteroids in our meteorite collection. There have been no findings of any super heavy transuranic elements. None. How could a segregation mechanism create one super heavy asteroid composed mostly of super-heavy element and but have no trace of them in any other sample?

    Second, the Earth itself was formed from the same reservoir of dust and debris. No super heavy elements.

    Third, another asteroid has been found with super high density. This density was later shown to be inaccurate from further measurements. Rather than theorize such an exotic solution we need to wait for further data that I predict will show the density is explainable with conventional elements.

    I also predict the Bennu sample will show only conventional elements. It's a C class asteroid which
    are already found in existing meteorites in our collections

    Cheers.
    All great points. Hypothesizing there to be super heavy elements in the Island of Stability within asteroids is wishful thinking. It's likely that if there were amalgamations of large quantities of these elements, they would form a critical mass and would quickly cease to exist in that form. It's why nobody thinks there are large quantities of uranium or plutonium in the center of the Earth (acknowledging that U-238 doesn't do the fission thing, but it largely comes from U-235, which does).

    We would also almost certainly find traces of superheavy elements on/near the surface of the Earth due to meteorite bombardment from the past 100,000 years or so. We would have likely detected them while looking for radiation sources. We would have unknown spectra in various astrophysical events.

    Maybe there are very tiny traces of these elements somewhere in the solar system, but certainty not enough to account for significantly increased densities in things like asteroids.
    Reply
  • Alan Sailer
    Had not considered the fission of super-heavy elements. A worthwhile point.

    Cheers.
    Reply