The Magellanic Clouds must be renamed, astronomers say
Ferdinand Magellan, who murdered and enslaved indigenous people, was not an astronomer nor the clouds' discoverer.
In September, astronomer Mia de los Reyes published an op-ed in the journal APS Physics, representing a coalition of astronomers calling for the renaming of two iconic, deeply studied and shining irregular galaxies near the Milky Way. One of these star-studded realms is named the Large Magellanic Cloud and the other, for reasons you'd probably expect, is named the Small Magellanic Cloud. But most importantly, what these two satellite galaxies have in common is they're named after Ferdinand Magellan.
Among other things, Magellan has gone down in history as the Portuguese explorer who murdered, enslaved and burned the homes of indigenous people while setting out to be the first person to circumnavigate the globe. As de los Reyes' article states, a first-hand account of Magellan's journey describes how he enslaved the native Teluche people, for instance, who lived in what is now Argentina, and placed iron manacles on the "youngest and best proportioned men." He's also recorded to have set entire villages ablaze in the region we now call Guam.
Magellan had his own personal slave as well, Enrique de Malacca, who he'd purchased before the journey and relied on to interpret indigenous languages — in fact, experts argue Enrique de Malacca's presence on the trip technically made him the first person to circumnavigate the globe after Magellan was killed in a fight with islanders in the Philippines. "Lapu-Lapu, the Mactan ruler whose forces killed Magellan, is often credited with slaying the explorer after run-ins with indigenous locals," according to National Geographic, though it's possible he didn't literally do the deed himself. Still, "as a result, [Lapu-Lapu] has become a national hero in the Philippines."
Related: It's official: NASA won't rename James Webb Space Telescope
So, knowing all this, the recently-announced coalition finds no reason Magellan, who was also not an astronomer, should be the namesake of the LMC and SMC. "This particular topic is something I’ve thought about since learning about these galaxies," de los Reyes, who is an assistant professor of astronomy at Amherst College, told Space.com. "I’m Filipino-American, and Magellan is an infamous figure in Filipino history, so this has always been at the back of my mind."
And beyond being "a colonizer, a slaver and a murderer," as de los Reyes writes in the op-ed, astronomers also agree he was not even the first to identify these clouds.
"Magellan was murderous and awful but that isn’t the primary issue," David W. Hogg, a professor of physics and data science at New York University and Group Leader for astronomical data at the Flatiron Institute, told Space.com. "The primary issue is that the clouds aren’t his discovery."
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
The words "Large Magellanic Cloud'' and "Small Magellanic Cloud" are incredibly common in the field of astronomy, as these sparkling realms are considered some of the best cosmic laboratories in which to study star formation. Not only are the Clouds teeming with stellar bodies, but because they sit so close to our galaxy, scientists are even able to investigate individual stars lying within. These satellite galaxies are also the only systems we clearly see hosting star clusters at every stage of evolution; several thousands of peer-reviewed academic articles mention results gleaned from the LMC and SMC.
This also means several thousands of peer-reviewed academic articles refer to Magellan — over 17,000, de los Reyes calculates.
Per a 2020 publication in the European Southern Observatory's journal for science and technology, The Messenger, local populations in South America already knew of these clouds well before Magellan's expedition. The Portuguese called them "Clouds of the Cape," author Michel Dennefeld writes, and scientific circles used the names "Nubecula Minor" and "Nubecula Major." German lawyer and amateur astronomer Johann Bayer, who invented the first modern star atlas "Uranometria" in 1603, also used the latter.
"It turns out that the 'Magellanic' name wasn't even widely attached to these galaxies until well into the 1800's, which was centuries after Magellan's expedition," Sally Oey, a professor of astronomy at the University of Michigan, told Space.com.
"Pretty much every astronomer I've talked to is supportive; criticisms seem to be primarily from a vocal minority of the general public," de los Reyes said. "I've gotten a few emails from folks — who don't appear to be astronomers — telling me to 'go back to doing science,' or that this is 'woke-ism' — that kind of thing.
"It doesn't seem to occur to these folks that nomenclature is part of science."
One of the more recent, and highly publicized, requests to rename an astronomy-related object concerns the James Webb Space Telescope. In March of 2021, several months before the JWST launched to space, scientists published an article in Scientific American about the alleged backstory of the telescope's namesake, James Webb, who ran NASA between February 1961 to October 1968.
In the article, authors write that Webb was in part responsible for a policy that allowed for the purging of LGBT individuals from the workforce, an event now dubbed "The Lavender Scare." In an 87-page report, NASA described its own investigation into the subject as a response. The agency found "no available evidence directly links Webb to any actions or follow-up related to the firing of individuals for their sexual orientation," according to an official statement. The name was not changed.
"If we're going to fault James Webb for the Lavender Scare, we would have to change the names of a lot of things and a lot of buildings," University of South Florida historian David Johnson, who wrote a book about the Lavender Scare, told Space.com following the report, highlighting NASA's Johnson and Kennedy space centers. "None of these people were particularly active in persecuting homosexuals, but just like Webb, they were there when this policy was in effect."
In the APS piece, de los Reyes writes about nuances of the JWST's renaming as well, stating "there will always be complications in naming monuments or facilities after individuals."
In a letter to the American Astronomical Society, following the JWST naming conclusion, current NASA administrator Bill Nelson said the agency is updating the processes of naming missions and buildings.
"People are not perfect," de los Reyes said, "and societal standards will change."
It's also worth mentioning that many astronomical items besides the LMC and SMC are named after Magellan, including a lunar crater and Martian crater named "Magalhaens" as well as NASA's Magellan mission that launched a spacecraft to Venus in the '80s.
One idea to get around the naming issue, de los Reyes says, is to stop naming things after people altogether and take a note from Mars rovers, named after ideals: Perseverance, Opportunity, Curiosity, Sojourner and Spirit.
"The other option," she says, "is to name things after people who, to the best of our knowledge, embody the values that we as a society currently uphold, and to accept that as our society progresses (which is a good thing!) we will likely need to revisit these names."
And the next generation of scientists, it would appear, will likely be attuned to these types of topics. De los Reyes says students in her astronomy classes are starting to ask questions about science that are beyond the theories and numbers, surrounding things like "What communities do we interface with and impact as we do science?" and "What historical and societal structures enable us to do science?"
"One of my students actually found my op-ed, thought it was interesting, and sent me a link without realizing that I wrote it!" she said. "I do think many students, and early career researchers in general, are more open to thinking about the ways that astronomy as a field and astronomers as people interact with broader society."
De los Reyes says that there are currently about 50 people in the coalition's core mailing list, but the group continues to garner more support by the day. "I can’t imagine how any astronomer could object to the renaming of the clouds," Hogg said," since there is absolutely no sense in which Magellan is in any way responsible for their discovery."
And, though there isn't a public petition for the name change yet, de los Reyes says the cadre will soon be pushing for a resolution with the International Astronomical Union.
"It turns out that getting astronomers to support changing the names is pretty easy, but getting them to agree on a new name is harder!" she said. "We plan to suggest several options for the IAU to vote on."
Some of those options could perhaps be to return to calling the LMC and SMC by the names Nubecula Major and Nubecula Minor, respectively, or inventing a Mars rover-esque tenet. De los Reyes, however, believes the easiest way is to probably just pick a new "M" word so scientists can continue using the acronyms LMC and SMC. "Meridional," meaning "of or related to the Southern Hemisphere," might be a good one, she said, or "Milky," referring to the Clouds' association with the Milky Way."
"This is not a new topic," de los Reyes said. "Other astronomers have been thinking about this since before I even entered the field, but I think the time wasn’t quite right to have this discussion. In the past few years, people have been having more discussions about renaming — not just in astronomy, but also in broader society — and we have more momentum now."
"One of the main hurdles is that people can feel attached to tradition," Oey said, but "this name doesn't have a very long tradition."
"There really isn't a strong reason to keep the name, other than convenience."
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Monisha Ravisetti is Space.com's Astronomy Editor. She covers black holes, star explosions, gravitational waves, exoplanet discoveries and other enigmas hidden across the fabric of space and time. Previously, she was a science writer at CNET, and before that, reported for The Academic Times. Prior to becoming a writer, she was an immunology researcher at Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York. She graduated from New York University in 2018 with a B.A. in philosophy, physics and chemistry. She spends too much time playing online chess. Her favorite planet is Earth.
-
rod Interesting report. I found at least 5 references to enslavement or slave. To be consistent with concerns in astronomy about slavery and past astronomical names that could be associated with past slavery, what about Sumerian astronomy names? Sargon conquered and took slaves. Babylonian astronomy names? The Code of Hammurabi shows these folks took slaves from the *four corners of the earth*. The Amarna tablets show some town leaders sold some of their folk into slavery to buy bread during times of famine. Egyptian Pharaohs periodically conquered towns in Canaan (Thutmose, Merneptah are examples) and took slaves too, including papyri showing they sent out solders to capture run away slaves.Reply
Then we have Greek astronomy and their taking of slaves, Roman slaves, and Islam too. The Quran has 114 Surahs (114 chapters) with references to slaves and slave ownership. Perhaps there are a variety of astronomical names that would need renaming now using modern standards it would seem. -
NRSastronomy
Copium and seethium is today’s special I see!Admin said:A coalition of over 50 astronomers is calling to rename the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds.
The Magellanic Clouds must be renamed, astronomers say : Read more -
wastelandbkr No one in these comments is here for science. They all got triggered and now they're here to complain that other people got triggeredReply -
carlo.milana In this sad political world, when shall we stop being so ridiculous with the so-called cancel culture?Reply
The Magellan clouds are there to stay forever as Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and Pluto planets!
Magellan, like the rest of us, was the son of Cain, not Abel! And you won't save yourself by cancelling the memory of mankind or your own ancestors. Let's have the courage to look at ourselves as their offspring!
Can't you think of something else better than changing the name of Magellan's clouds? -
Dortmund66 I personally think people should be judged by the standards of their time. I honestly do not know what standards there were then. But I think we have to be careful judging figures of the past by our standards. That being said, I in no way at all support the slavery and killing of the past. I see it as completely wrong.Reply -
Atlan0001
Nature is beautiful only when observed from a distance! Looked at closely, it's a slaughter pen, an eat or be eaten nature. Even vegetation ebbs and flows, over running and wiping out other vegetation. The tidal waves of energy and change. The only living solution is space frontiers, genesis and exodus . . . null unity (singularly zeroing) and unities (discreet quanta plural). There is nothing benign about evolution. But, given space, given room, there can be preservation of the old side by side with the new and benign (that is to say more benign, less malignant) continuances of the incompatible.Dortmund66 said:I personally think people should be judged by the standards of their time. I honestly do not know what standards there were then. But I think we have to be careful judging figures of the past by our standards. That being said, I in no way at all support the slavery and killing of the past. I see it as completely wrong. -
Atlan0001
Mercury didn't discover Mercury, nor Venus, Venus, nor Mars, Mars, nor Jupiter, Jupiter, ....Markan said:Love how conservative people call everything they disagree with "woke"... They know they don't really have any kind of argument other than ideology or religion (which is two forms of the same things) so they put all their disarray in a word, "woke", thinking anyone cares or is offended and they they won a discussion they never even entered... Also love how haters in this thread totally occult the fact that Magellan didn't even discovered the clouds, which as mentioned several times in the article is actually the main reason why they should be renamed.... THEY feel offended in their beliefs, so they wine and rant.
Some people would like things to never change and think the way thngs are when they live should or will eternally remain the same, while society, like everything in the universe, keeps evolving, whether they like or not... Then time passes and these people are perceived as neandertal... that's the same peole who didn't want slavery or segragation in America to stop... But Lincoln, MLK or Mandela were woke I guess in these poeple's mind. -
Messier83 as a Filipino this is just so Irrelevant... Magellanic clouds are one of the closest massive objects on our Milky way and Magellan only recently discovered it for 500 years ago.. just keep the Magellanic name because these two galaxies reminds me of the Last Magellan's expedition Ship survived that left Philippines which was Trinidad and Victoria..Reply
As same to Magellan's being the first one to Circle around the world these Two Galaxies Large and Small Magellanic clouds also Circling around our Milky way galaxy.. coincidence? -
Dortmund66
All I wanted to say was to keep the old names. Not sure of your point but between the two points of zero in my existence, I only want to help others. Renaming small galaxies is irrelevant to that.Atlan0001 said:Nature is beautiful only when observed from a distance! Looked at closely, it's a slaughter pen, an eat or be eaten nature. Even vegetation ebbs and flows, over running and wiping out other vegetation. The tidal waves of energy and change. The only living solution is space frontiers, genesis and exodus . . . null unity (singularly zeroing) and unities (discreet quanta plural). There is nothing benign about evolution. But, given space, given room, there can be preservation of the old side by side with the new and benign (that is to say more benign, less malignant) continuances of the incompatible.