Boeing considers selling its space business, including Starliner: report

a cone-shaped spacecraft visible through another spacecraft window. earth is below
Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft is pictured docked to the Harmony module’s forward port at the International Space Station. (Image credit: NASA)

Boeing may sell off its space business, including its Starliner program, amid large financial losses for the company, a media report suggests.

The discussions are said to be "at an early stage," according to an exclusive in the Wall Street Journal. The reported talks come less than two months after Starliner completed its first astronaut test flight on Sept. 6 by touching down in New Mexico autonomously, without its two crewmembers.

Boeing is known for decades of work with NASA, including being the prime contractor for the International Space Station. (The company continues engineering support services for ISS to this day.) But Boeing is facing mounting financial issues this year, including a protracted strike by its largest labor union and significant deficits in the Starliner program.

The WSJ report emphasizes, however, that discussions about selling the company's space business — spurred by Kelly Ortberg, Boeing’s new chief executive officer, who was appointed Aug. 8 — are "at an early stage."

Related: When will Boeing’s Starliner fly astronauts again? NASA still doesn’t know

And it's uncertain how much of the business may be sold, if a sale happens at all. For example, Boeing may keep its role in leading the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket for NASA's Artemis program of moon exploration, the WSJ report noted. The SLS successfully launched the Artemis 1 uncrewed mission to lunar orbit in 2022 and will launch astronauts around the moon as soon as 2025, with Artemis 2.

Boeing also has a 50% stake, along with Lockheed Martin, in United Launch Alliance, a national security focused-launch provider whose Atlas V rocket launched the Starliner mission on June 5. Lockheed and Boeing have reportedly been looking to sell ULA, as the joint venture moves into launches with a next-generation rocket known as Vulcan Centaur. Vulcan completed its second-ever launch on Oct. 2.

Starliner's development has resulted in financial losses for Boeing. In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Oct. 23, for example, Boeing reported a $250 million charge in the third quarter of its fiscal year "primarily to reflect schedule delays and higher testing and certification costs" for Starliner. Boeing's second-quarter results showed an additional $125 million loss on the program.

The spacecraft is a small part of Boeing's defense, space and security business, which reported $3.1 billion in losses (against $18.5 billion in revenues) in the first nine months of 2024, according to Boeing's Q3 results. Boeing's head of the division, Ted Colbert, was removed in September, according to multiple media outlets, including the Associated Press.

A United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket carrying Boeing's Starliner Crew Flight Test (CFT) for NASA's Commercial Crew Program lifts off from Space Launch Complex-41 on June 5, 2024. (Image credit: United Launch Alliance)

Starliner received the lion's share of Boeing coverage in space circles this year, however, following its Starliner astronaut test flight. As a developmental ISS mission, issues were expected, and schedules were not necessarily set in stone.

That said, propulsion problems during the capsule's journey to the ISS surprised the team, given that Starliner's engineers had already addressed thruster issues that cropped up during uncrewed flights in 2019 and 2022. Five out of 28 thrusters in Starliner's reaction control system for in-space maneuvers failed on the recent astronaut mission, which was known as Crew Flight Test (CFT).

Starliner managed to dock successfully to the ISS on June 6 despite the thruster problems. Boeing and NASA examined the thruster issues for nearly two months and repeatedly delayed Starliner's departure from the ISS. But they could not find the root cause and remedy, and NASA ultimately decided that bringing the astronauts back to Earth on Starliner was too much of a risk.

The two astronauts assigned to Starliner, former U.S. Navy test pilots Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, saw their expected 10-day mission extended to at least eight months as their spacecraft departed. They are now expected to return home in February 2025 aboard the other commercial craft used by NASA, SpaceX's Crew Dragon.

NASA awarded both SpaceX and Boeing multi-billion dollar contracts in 2014 to ferry astronauts to and from the ISS. Crew Dragon was based on the successful cargo Dragon craft that first flew to space in 2012, while Starliner is a completely new spacecraft. Crew Dragon has now launched on nine operational astronaut missions to the ISS for NASA since its 2020 crewed test flight.

Starliner was supposed to fly its first operational mission, known as Starliner-1, in 2025 with three astronauts on board. Recently, however, Richard Jones, deputy program manager of NASA's Commercial Crew Program at Johnson Space Center in Houston, said the agency is still determining next steps after the troubled test flight.

"We're just starting that — just trying to understand how to correct and rectify the issues that are on the table," Jones said on Oct. 25. "The schedules associated with how long, and what will be required in that area, [are] in front of us, and we'll be working hard on that to know."

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Elizabeth Howell
Staff Writer, Spaceflight

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 specializing in Canadian space news. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time. Elizabeth's reporting includes multiple exclusives with the White House, speaking several times with the International Space Station, witnessing five human spaceflight launches on two continents, flying parabolic, working inside a spacesuit, and participating in a simulated Mars mission. Her latest book, "Why Am I Taller?" (ECW Press, 2022) is co-written with astronaut Dave Williams. 

  • bobs
    Corrupt corporate junk company which is declared a felon by courts!!! what an achievement !!!What ever it touches is junk and crap!! better go bankrupt before killing millions of travellers
    Reply
  • vadertime
    Boing needs to get out of the Starliner businees ASAP after it's spectacular failure to meet expectations after delays and cost overruns. Thank goodness NASA wisely negotiated a fixed price contract. However, the SLS is a whole different white elephant, which is far more expensive, late and way over budget. I'm not sure if NASA or Boeing can end that marriage, since there isn't another dance partner with those kind of resources not to mention the unbelievably high cost per SLS rocket launch according to the Inspector General.

    NASA, and Congress, foolishly chose to go back to the moon after we'd already been there a dozen times back in the 1970s. If they wanted to build a permanent prescence on the moon then why not back then and why now.? NASA and Congress's focus should be on Mars and beyond and not that dead, stupid, useless rock orbiting 250K miles distance around the Earth. Build a high-orbit space platform so we can launch deep space vehicles to explore the solar system and beyond.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Boeing does indeed seem to be in deep trouble. For instance, read https://www.yahoo.com/tech/boeing-strike-existential-threat-boeing-163755467.html .

    And Artemis seems to be in other trouble, too. Not just the Orion capsule heat shield, but the whole schedule seems to depend on a lot of commercial companies needing to provide key equipment that has not even been designed, yet, much less tested at this time.

    But, I am going to disagree with the posters above who think we should be skipping the Moon and heading directly for Mars.

    We need experience with a continuously crewed habitat on the Moon before we are ready to try for something similar on Mars. And, there are plenty of reasons to want to use the Moon for scientific purposes, including both the geology of the Moon to learn more about the history of our own planet and planetary system, and for large, serviceable, upgradable telescopes that the Moon can shield from all of the interference we emit on Earth.

    SpaceX seems like the obvious choice to support NASA's goals on the Moon. With some backup from other companies, such as Blue Origin, NASA could probably do away with the SLS and work with SpaceX to develop most of what is needed to get to the Moon and support a habitat there. And, SpaceX would probably appreciate the associated funding to do most of what it is planning to do anyway without NASA.

    The way things are going now, I don't think NASA has much choice, other than failure. The funding by Congress is just not sufficient to finish the development of SLS and provide enough launches. But, if SuperHeavy and StarShip soon achieve their design capabilities, they would offer NASA a transportation option that it could actually afford.
    Reply
  • George²
    Still, I hope that the long-standing rumors of a big Jeff Bezos rocket turn out to be true someday. If New Armstrong comes to fruition, there will be Starship/SuperHeavy competition in superheavy space launch systems. Including at distances far beyond the Moon for manned spaceships.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Just pure speculation. I think that once Space X gets it’s heavy certified, both demand and business will boom. Probably the most lucrative until A.I. becomes a cheap subscription. Then the search will be for cheap juice.

    I think others will seek this tech and provide some competition. This reusable tech allows private billionaires access to this demand. And it’s so sheikh.

    It could become a status symbol like a yacht. And a helipad is just so yesterday. Chopsticks are in.
    Reply