NASA delays landing of Boeing's 1st Starliner astronaut mission to June 22

Boeing's Starliner capsule approaches the International Space Station for docking on June 6, 2024.
Boeing's Starliner capsule approaches the International Space Station for docking on June 6, 2024. (Image credit: NASA)

Boeing's first crewed Starliner mission, that ferried astronauts to the International Space Station, will need to wait a little longer before returning its crew to Earth. 

On June 5, the Crew Flight Test (CFT) for Boeing's Starliner spacecraft launched with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams on board; the spacecraft docked at the International Space Station (ISS) the next day. The mission's objective was to complete a full on-orbit shakedown of the spacecraft, and it was originally set to last about a week. Now, the pair won't return home until June 22, at the earliest.

"We are continuing to understand the capabilities of Starliner to prepare for the long-term goal of having it perform a six-month docked mission at the space station," Steve Stich, manager of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, said in a mission blog post. In the interim, CFT crew members Wilmore and Williams will perform additional checks on Starliner, including a "hot-fire" test of seven of the spacecraft's eight aft thrusters and a review of hatch operations. They will also perform "safe haven" drills that will help them prepare the capsule in case of an emergency.

"We have an incredible opportunity to spend more time at station and perform more tests which provides invaluable data unique to our position," Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager for Boeing's Commercial Crew Program, said in the blog update. The CFT mission was designed with a possible delay in mind, and Nappi said NASA and Boeing teams "have plenty of margin and time on station to maximize the opportunity for all partners to learn."

Related: NASA calls off spacewalk at International Space Station due to 'spacesuit discomfort'

This is the second delay in Starliner's scheduled return date. The first was announced June 9, which is what pushed Wilmore and Williams' return to June 18 in the first place;  the reason behind that delay was ISS residents required more time to prepare for and perform an extravehicular activity (EVA) originally planned for June 13. That EVA was canceled, however, due to "spacesuit discomfort" about an hour before NASA astronauts Tracy Dyson and Matt Dominick were set to egress the station.

Now, Wilmore and Williams will spend an extra four days aboard the space station, bringing their total stay to just over two weeks. NASA did not immediately outline a direct reason for the most recent delay, but has scheduled a press briefing for Tuesday, June 18, to elaborate further the new departure date, and to review weather conditions for the June 22 landing target.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Josh Dinner
Writer, Content Manager

Josh Dinner is Space.com's Content Manager. He is a writer and photographer with a passion for science and space exploration, and has been working the space beat since 2016. Josh has covered the evolution of NASA's commercial spaceflight partnerships, from early Dragon and Cygnus cargo missions to the ongoing development and launches of crewed missions from the Space Coast, as well as NASA science missions and more. He also enjoys building 1:144 scale models of rockets and human-flown spacecraft. Find some of Josh's launch photography on Instagram and his website, and follow him on Twitter, where he mostly posts in haiku.

  • FireNWater
    NASA marketing department is going to need to sit down soon after all of their spinning. . .
    Reply
  • LemmyCaution
    The NASA spokesperson's statement regarding the six month ISS stay capabilities of the Boeing Starliner is one of the best examples of pretending to actually say something I've ever come across.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    This is sounding more and more like there is some real concern about the reliability of the thrusters to get the crew back safely. Especially the hot fire test of "7 of the 8 aft thrusters".
    Reply
  • Coconutwater
    Five different leaks in the propulsion system. NASA refuses to comment on the possibility of a rescue mission.

    'The extra time allows the team to finalize departure planning and operations while the spacecraft remains cleared for crew emergency return scenarios within the flight rules,' NASA and Boeing said in a statement.

    Pray for the best.
    Reply
  • DSyno
    I think I speak for everyone when I say: What the ...?
    Reply
  • DanaBspaced
    It would certainly be nice to have working thrusters for reentry, and a hatch that closes properly.
    Reply
  • Rob77
    When I first heard of the mishaps of Starliner after lift-off (before docking) I bet Dragon is getting ready for a taxi fair.
    And I still stand by that statement!
    Reply
  • RiversRider$!
    Complacency and arrogant leadership leads to crashed spacecraft and dead astronauts! SpaceX is in it for the exploration and the knowledge of "what's out there", Boeing is in it for the $$$$!
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    RiversRider$! said:
    Complacency and arrogant leadership leads to crashed spacecraft and dead astronauts! SpaceX is in it for the exploration and the knowledge of "what's out there", Boeing is in it for the $$$$!
    Don't assume SpaceX is so altruistic. They too are into making money, as are all the other companies lobbing rockets into space.
    Reply