Boeing's Starliner tests thrusters at ISS as NASA reviews options for astronauts' return to Earth

a cone-shaped spacecraft visible above the curve of earth, with clouds
Boeing Starliner docked at the International Space Station in 2024, during Crew Flight Test. (Image credit: NASA)

The first Boeing Starliner to fly astronauts to space performed a crucial in-space test Saturday (July 27) as the next mission faces a months-long delay.

Engineers tested Starliner's reaction control system (RCS) thrusters to prepare for a wider agency review that will evaluate the spacecraft's readiness for landing NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams sometime in August, if all goes to plan.

"Teams will evaluate the results of the test firings over the next few days as they work through overall studies, ahead of an agency readiness review," NASA officials wrote in a statement on X, formerly Twitter, on Saturday.

Starliner faced issues during the debut astronaut docking with the International Space Station (ISS) on June 6. While it eventually made it, helium leaks and issues with five thrusters delayed the event. Starliner is rated to leave the ISS in case of emergency, but before astronauts attempt a nominal departure, engineers are trying to understand why those issues happened.

Figuring out what happened is key to the readiness of the next mission, Starliner-1, which is supposed to spend six months on the ISS in 2025. On Friday (July 28), NASA announced a delay of that mission to August 2025, past an initial expectation of early winter. 

Related: 50 days after launch to ISS, Boeing Starliner astronauts still have no landing date

NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, wearing Boeing spacesuits, smile as they prepare to depart the Neil A. Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building for Launch Complex 41 to board the Boeing CST-100 Starliner spacecraft for the Crew Flight Test launch at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station Kennedy Space Center in Florida, on June 1, 2024.  (Image credit: MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO/AFP via Getty Images)

NASA and Boeing have not yet identified how they will fix Starliner's issues, whether by design or by changing the way astronauts in the future fire thrusters, officials told reporters on Thursday (July 27). But in the meantime, Starliner-1 will delay to allow "a little bit more time for Starliner to complete the mods from the new tests," NASA's Steve Stich told reporters. Stich is NASA's commercial crew program manager.

Starliner's current space mission, known as Crew Flight Test (CFT), was at first expected to last 10 days. It is now at nearly 55 days in space, with the astronauts living off a reserve of supplies on ISS already there for the unexpected. The mission is developmental and as such, there was uncertainty with the timeline, NASA and Boeing both stressed before the mission.

Boeing's Starliner capsule approaches the International Space Station for docking on June 6, 2024. (Image credit: NASA TV)

In a blog post, Boeing officials stated the new RCS test was performed to "confirm the performance of each thruster" in brief bursts, as long as 1.2 seconds each. (The RCS has 28 thrusters, but engineers removed one thruster from testing weeks ago as they deemed it unable to fire properly for the return to Earth.) Each tested thruster showed peak thrust ranging from 97 percent to 102 percent. 

"The helium system also remained stable," Boeing officials wrote. Wilmore and Williams did not directly fire the thrusters, but remained on board Starliner and reported what they were seeing to the ground. (The duo are both former U.S. Navy test pilots and have years of experience in developmental aerospace programs.)

Ground testing on a thruster this month uncovered why CFT's RCS had issues: If fired repeatedly, especially in conjunction with the orbital maneuvering and control system (OMAC) thrusters, the "doghouses" or insulated bays sheltering groups of RCS thrusters tend to heat up, leading to thrusters shedding Teflon insulation from their seals. NASA and Boeing also said this issue could not have been uncovered on the ground, ahead of flying CFT.

Starliner is one of two systems funded by NASA to send astronauts to the ISS. The other is Crew Dragon, built by SpaceX. Crew Dragon first flew a crewed test in 2020, using a design based on SpaceX's Cargo Dragon ISS vehicle. After the test, Crew Dragon has completed 11 ISS missions: 8 half-year missions on behalf of NASA and 3 weeks-longs missions on behalf of Axiom Space. 

Crew-9, the ninth operational ISS mission by SpaceX, is slated to lift off no earlier than Aug. 18 and Starliner should be home by then, NASA has said.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Elizabeth Howell
Staff Writer, Spaceflight

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 covering diversity, education and gaming as well. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time. Elizabeth's reporting includes multiple exclusives with the White House and Office of the Vice-President of the United States, an exclusive conversation with aspiring space tourist (and NSYNC bassist) Lance Bass, speaking several times with the International Space Station, witnessing five human spaceflight launches on two continents, flying parabolic, working inside a spacesuit, and participating in a simulated Mars mission. Her latest book, "Why Am I Taller?", is co-written with astronaut Dave Williams. Elizabeth holds a Ph.D. and M.Sc. in Space Studies from the University of North Dakota, a Bachelor of Journalism from Canada's Carleton University and a Bachelor of History from Canada's Athabasca University. Elizabeth is also a post-secondary instructor in communications and science at several institutions since 2015; her experience includes developing and teaching an astronomy course at Canada's Algonquin College (with Indigenous content as well) to more than 1,000 students since 2020. Elizabeth first got interested in space after watching the movie Apollo 13 in 1996, and still wants to be an astronaut someday. Mastodon: https://qoto.org/@howellspace

  • brunodoggy
    How can you report: "Ground testing on a thruster this month uncovered why CFT's RCS had issues" and in the same paragraph say: "NASA and Boeing also said this issue could not have been uncovered on the ground"?
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    I can dig it. Space was required to indicate and determine. Ground was required for confirmation of what space indicated.
    Reply
  • JPL_ACE
    brunodoggy said:
    How can you report: "Ground testing on a thruster this month uncovered why CFT's RCS had issues" and in the same paragraph say: "NASA and Boeing also said this issue could not have been uncovered on the ground"?
    I can imagine a situation where the ground tests do not directly explain a problem but it is immediate in space. you can not test a rocket in a vacuum on the ground. Before it is even lit, it is no longer a vacuum. Other problems are the sun and dark every 45 min, an insulated dog house, and chem reactions of fuel are different in space than the ground.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    I tend to agree with brunodoggy. It seems like firing the thrusters on the ground in a pattern that simulates the firing sequence for approach and docking would have uncovered a heating problem in the doghouses, and created the same teflon seal problem if that is really due to overheating.

    Yes, there are differences in the space environment, but nothing specific was said about why this could not have been identified with proper testing on the ground. So, I am not really "buying" this press release.
    Reply
  • josefnspace
    "Ground testing on a thruster this month uncovered why CFT's RCS had issues: If fired repeatedly, especially in conjunction with the orbital maneuvering and control system (OMAC) thrusters, the "doghouses" or insulated bays sheltering groups of RCS thrusters tend to heat up, leading to thrusters shedding Teflon insulation from their seals. NASA and Boeing also said this issue could not have been uncovered on the ground, ahead of flying CFT."

    Why weren't the RCS and OMAC systems included in the pre-flight ground tests?
    The "conditions are different in space" explanation is similar to "the dog ate my homework" excuse.

    Boeing & NASA have spent billions of dollars with years of delays on a half completed flight.
    Meanwhile SpaceX has successfully transported 50 astronauts to the ISS with four more on Crew-9.
    Reply
  • Hal_S
    Wait, I thought there were protocols that prohibited / strictly limited the amount of thruster firing when NEAR the ISS, let alone when attached to it?
    Reply
  • billslugg
    They boost ISS to a higher orbit frequently. Lots of thruster firing in that process. Maybe there are protocols about not firing a thruster directly at ISS.
    Reply
  • buzzallnight
    Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams need to be working on realistic dummies they can put in that space craft to save their own lives!!!
    Reply
  • DanaBspaced
    JPL_ACE said:
    I can imagine a situation where the ground tests do not directly explain a problem but it is immediate in space. you can not test a rocket in a vacuum on the ground. Before it is even lit, it is no longer a vacuum. Other problems are the sun and dark every 45 min, an insulated dog house, and chem reactions of fuel are different in space than the ground.
    Explain how the chemical reactions are different in space. It is a simple hyperbolic system. Used for decades.

    And explain so I can understand "before is even lit, it is no longer a vacuum."
    Reply
  • DanaBspaced
    brunodoggy said:
    How can you report: "Ground testing on a thruster this month uncovered why CFT's RCS had issues" and in the same paragraph say: "NASA and Boeing also said this issue could not have been uncovered on the ground"?
    You should be there for their next news conference.
    Reply