3 decades of satellite images show how cities keep getting higher

The full Worm Moon rises behind the skyline of midtown Manhattan and the Empire State Building in New York City as traffic drives down the 14th Street viaduct on March 25, 2024, in Hoboken, New Jersey.
The full Worm Moon rises behind the skyline of midtown Manhattan and the Empire State Building in New York City as traffic drives down the 14th Street viaduct on March 25, 2024, in Hoboken, New Jersey. (Image credit: Gary Hershorn/Getty Images)

Cities around the world are growing upward more than they are spreading outward, scientists studying decades of satellite data recently announced — quantifying a profound, global shift in development of cities, where chains of skyscrapers have also become their single biggest contributor to increasing heat.

"Cities everywhere have grown," study lead author Steve Frolking of the University of New Hampshire told Space.com. "I don't think it's particularly a surprising result — everybody's individual experience with a particular city is that there are probably more tall buildings now than there were 20 years ago."

For the first time, Frolking and his colleagues have put numbers to that sense of shift. Using data from multiple Earth observing satellites, the researchers studied the growth of more than 1,550 cities worldwide from 1990 to 2020 — a period during which urban populations roughly doubled from about 2 billion to 4 billion. The team used information collected by NASA's Landsat, for instance, which recorded how much land buildings around the world occupied. Meanwhile, data from a series of sensors flown on European Remote Sensing (ERS) satellites cataloged the buildings' upward growth. 

Combining the two kinds of data, the researchers found fast-developing countries like China, southeast Asia, parts of Africa and the Middle East grew upward dramatically, while developed countries like North America, Europe, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea added taller buildings at a slower rate, the researchers wrote in a paper published earlier this month in Nature Cities.

Related: Earth's Cities at Night: Photos From Space

While each country's economy, land prices and regulations around building heights all seemed to influence the pace at which its cities grew, the analysis also shows that urban growth is not limited anymore to  just a handful of cities like New York, Tokyo and Shanghai. Historically, that has been the case.

"We see this shift primarily in large cities with more than a million people," Frolking said. "Typically — although not always — the transition happens first in the center of the city and then spreads outward."

Such city centers, which tend to be called "downtowns," are preferred residential locations because they offer shorter work commutes, entertainment hubs and other amenities, as well as easier access to public transportation. By 2050, 68% of the world's population is expected to move to a downtown area, with much of that increase occurring in India, China and Nigeria, a 2018 report by the United Nations found. 

Yet, city growth also brings with it air, noise and light pollution. High-rise structures can exacerbate strong gusts in surrounding streets, and densely populated cities are known to be heat islands — large human-made structures like buildings and roads absorb and release solar heat more than rural, greenery-rich areas do. 

Cities around the world have transitioned from growing outward (dark blue) to building up (light blue).  (Image credit: Frolking et al./Nature Cities)

Previous research has found such structures, which warm up throughout the day and release heat slowly after sunset, vent that heat not just into the air but also into the ground. Alessandro Rotta Loria, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Northwestern University who led that research, termed underground climate change a "silent hazard" that weakens the foundations of buildings and affects their operational performance and durability.

"It has consequences for greenhouse gas emissions, from both structures themselves and transportation infrastructure around that in order to get people to live there or work there," said Frolking.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Sharmila Kuthunur
Space.com contributor

Sharmila Kuthunur is a Seattle-based science journalist covering astronomy, astrophysics and space exploration. Follow her on X @skuthunur.

  • Damon A
    Everything causes global warming now. We must panic, run in circles, and then just drop dead on the spot.

    Isn't it odd that every time man gets blamed for global warming, the sun is super active, the ice caps on Mars are shrinking, and things on Earth are heating up too? I'm not saying mankind isn't causing some of the problem, which I'm not convinced is really a problem, but I know we're part of the change. Guess what? Earth has survived change for billions of years. From Snowball Earth to palm trees growing in Antarctica, climate has changed naturally over the years. And sometimes radically fast. We have been fortunately for the last 10,000 years to live in a remarkably stable climatic period. But that's not the norm. And at any time it could end.

    It doesn't help the cause of the alarmists that they are constantly lying about data, changing historical data, claiming now is the warmest period in the last 13.8 billions years of universal history, and generally trying to blame every problem that exists on global warming. Warm year? Global warming. Record cold? Global warming. Low ice in the Arctic? Global Warming. Ice sheet is making a record recovery? Global warming. Stubbed my toe? Global warming.

    Guess what? The Great Barrier Reef is at record high area coverage and very healthy. The Pacific Islands aren't sinking into the sea. And the Earth is getting greener. Yet no matter what, the alarmists will throw their hands and scream about how it's the end.

    Goodbye world, I guess it's all over.
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    Damon A said:
    Everything causes global warming now. We must panic, run in circles, and then just drop dead on the spot.

    Isn't it odd that every time man gets blamed for global warming, the sun is super active, the ice caps on Mars are shrinking, and things on Earth are heating up too? I'm not saying mankind isn't causing some of the problem, which I'm not convinced is really a problem, but I know we're part of the change. Guess what? Earth has survived change for billions of years. From Snowball Earth to palm trees growing in Antarctica, climate has changed naturally over the years. And sometimes radically fast. We have been fortunately for the last 10,000 years to live in a remarkably stable climatic period. But that's not the norm. And at any time it could end.

    It doesn't help the cause of the alarmists that they are constantly lying about data, changing historical data, claiming now is the warmest period in the last 13.8 billions years of universal history, and generally trying to blame every problem that exists on global warming. Warm year? Global warming. Record cold? Global warming. Low ice in the Arctic? Global Warming. Ice sheet is making a record recovery? Global warming. Stubbed my toe? Global warming.

    Guess what? The Great Barrier Reef is at record high area coverage and very healthy. The Pacific Islands aren't sinking into the sea. And the Earth is getting greener. Yet no matter what, the alarmists will throw their hands and scream about how it's the end.

    Goodbye world, I guess it's all over.
    So, are you suggesting that human activity doesn't exacerbate natural cycles?

    Seems that cherry picking of data occurs on both sides of many arguments, a subtlety that many fail to see as in this post.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    I don't think there is much argument that cities are generally getting higher buildings.

    But, the generalizations in this article seem somewhat odd. Where I live, "cities" are definitely expanding in area, too, if you include "suburbs" as parts of the cities. Much rural land is now converted not just to "residential" and "commercial", but also multiple story apartments and multi-story professional buildings. Everything seems to be getting built taller, with the tallest being (mostly) in the centers of cities. Long ago around here, a very tall residential building was built in the midst of rural and natural lands, and it sparked a legal battle and zoning changes, both on aesthetic grounds and privacy issues, related to the "views" in both directions.

    This article then ends with a rather flimsy statement about the effects of dense city centers on the global environment. Mainly:
    ""It has consequences for greenhouse gas emissions, from both structures themselves and transportation infrastructure around that in order to get people to live there or work there."

    But, there is no logical argument that putting the same number of people into more low-rise suburban environments would somehow lower CO2 emissions or decrease other environmental disruptions. In fact, the article does not actually say that the cities' impacts are worse than the alternatives - it just seems to be implied by the closing sentence.

    I suspect that any comprehensive analysis would show that the total of detrimental effects on the natural environment from expanding human population would be minimized by accommodating them into existing city areas with increased vertical development, rather than into increased area with unchanged vertical dimension limits.

    Just the emissions from personal transportation would seem to make that effect clear. But, there are many efficiencies involved, as well as some losses of efficiency. For instance, heating energy demands are much lower in winter, while cooling demands in summer are much higher in cities, even in winter.

    But, the real issue is probably going to be what happens to cities that were designed primarily for cold winters when the climate changes enough that their biggest challenge will be from hot summers?

    Hot cities do change the local weather, too. Where I live, the local rainfall is reduced because we are generally down-wind from a large urban heat island. "Fronts" with rainfall that pass over the city usually develop a hole with little or no rain in that part of the front when it reaches our location. On the upwind side, storms are often more severe.
    Reply
  • ng218
    This headline immediately reminds me of Mark Thornton's book "The Skyscraper Curse."
    Reply