A dynamic form of dark energy may explain strange radiation signal from the early universe
We may have already found evidence of an evolving, dynamic kind of dark energy from the first stars in our universe.
Dark energy, the mysterious entity that dominates the energy of the cosmos and appears to be accelerating the expansion of the universe, presents a cosmic conundrum for scientists.
In short, cosmologists have no idea what dark energy really is. So they are concocting all sorts of possible models, and exploring the observational consequences of those models, in hopes of finding some clue as to what dark energy is and how it works.
Now, new research suggests that we may have already found evidence of an evolving, dynamic kind of dark energy, in the form of the radiation emitted when the first stars appeared in the universe.
Billions of years ago, the universe was much darker than it is today. It took time for the first stars and galaxies to coalesce and appear, and when they did, they completely transformed the cosmos.
Related: The history of the universe from Big Bang to now in 10 steps
Prior to the formation of the first stars, the universe was dominated by a thin fog of neutral hydrogen and helium gas. That gas had formed during the momentous epoch known as recombination, a stage that occurred when our universe was 380,000 years old and had cooled to the point where the hot plasma could become neutral — when electrons could finally bind to nuclei to form the first atoms.
When the first stars ignited, however, their intense radiation ripped through the neutral gas, turning it back into a plasma state. And so cosmologists named the appearance of the first stars the "Cosmic Dawn" and the subsequent dramatic phase change of the universe the "Epoch of Reionization." These events occurred around a few hundred million years after the Big Bang.
We do not yet have any direct measurements or maps of the cosmological epoch when the first stars and galaxies formed, or of the Epoch of Reionization. The main challenge is that these events occurred an extremely long time ago, so the light from those first stars is incredibly weak.
An open window
But there is another window into the Epoch of Reionization. Neutral hydrogen emits radiation at an extremely specific wavelength: 21 centimeters (8.3 inches). This is not a strong signal at all, but there was a whole lot of neutral hydrogen back in the day. But that radiation was emitted billions of years ago, and in the intervening ages, the universe has expanded to be about 10 times its previous size. That expansion has stretched the wavelength of that 21-cm radiation, and today, it's now detectable in radio wavelengths.
In 2018, a team of astronomers claimed to have detected the 21-cm signal emitted when the universe was only 230 million years old. But the signal from that radiation was more than twice as strong as theoretical calculations had suggested. Assuming that the observation is valid (which is still a matter of debate, as the result has yet to be replicated by another team), it suggests that something in our understanding of early cosmic history is off.
Most recently, Lu Yin, an astrophysicist at the Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics in South Korea, has suggested a new possibility to explain the strange result.
Dynamics in the dark
Yin's work, published to the preprint database arXiv, explored a model called interacting Chevallier-Polarski-Linder dark energy, or ICPL. In this model, dark energy is not a fixed constant of the cosmos but a dynamical entity that can change and evolve in time, resulting in changes in the acceleration rate of expansion. But that ability to evolve immediately opens up a question: What controls the way dark energy can change? In response, this model allows for dark energy to interact with dark matter; their behavior is linked, keeping both of them in check as the universe expands.
There are more cosmological observations than the 21-cm signal. So, to start, Yin tuned the ICPL model to fit other observations, especially ones focusing on the recent expansion history of the universe. With a tuned model in hand, Yin then simulated the evolution of the early universe. Yin found that this ICPL model caused stars and galaxies to appear earlier than in standard cosmological models, which made the ICPL model better at accounting for the strange observed 21-cm signal compared with traditional cosmological models.
This is an intriguing result, but not a slam dunk. The 21-cm observations are still in dispute, and there are other possible explanations for the strange signal. Still, this shows how scientists can approach observations like this and continue to push into the frontiers of understanding dark energy and dark matter.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at SUNY Stony Brook and the Flatiron Institute in New York City. Paul received his PhD in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and spent three years at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, followed by a research fellowship in Trieste, Italy, His research focuses on many diverse topics, from the emptiest regions of the universe to the earliest moments of the Big Bang to the hunt for the first stars. As an "Agent to the Stars," Paul has passionately engaged the public in science outreach for several years. He is the host of the popular "Ask a Spaceman!" podcast, author of "Your Place in the Universe" and "How to Die in Space" and he frequently appears on TV — including on The Weather Channel, for which he serves as Official Space Specialist.
-
rod Quite a report here for BB cosmology, perhaps finding the 21-cm line for the Epoch of Reionization :) I note this about the nature of dark energy reported here in the space.com article.Reply
"Yin's work, published to the preprint database arXiv, explored a model called interacting Chevallier-Polarski-Linder dark energy, or ICPL. In this model, dark energy is not a fixed constant of the cosmos but a dynamical entity that can change and evolve in time, resulting in changes in the acceleration rate of expansion. But that ability to evolve immediately opens up a question: What controls the way dark energy can change? In response, this model allows for dark energy to interact with dark matter; their behavior is linked, keeping both of them in check as the universe expands."
My view, this model looks very convenient here for the behavior or dark energy and dark matter in BB cosmology, *keeping both of them in check as the universe expands.* :)
I note this about the redshift reported too, z about 17, a very deep redshift. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.20038.pdf, "I. INTRODUCTION The Experiment to Detect the Global Epoch of Reionization Signature (EDGES) has reported the detection of an absorption profile centered at 78 MHz , corresponding to a redshift z ≈ 17, which is named the global 21-cm signal."
My note, redshift about 17 using cosmology calculators (https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/toolbox/calculators.html) puts us way out there from Earth :) 13.494 billion light years look back distance and age of universe at z=17, 0.228 Gyr. The comoving radial distance is even much farther away from Earth today :) 34.941 Gly so space expands 2.4339135E+00 or 2.43 x c velocity. Has JWST confirmed redshifts of objects at 17 or larger? So far, I have not seen any published confirmations of such large redshifts being seen by JWST. Lyman break method and spectroscopic method. The space.com report does close with. "This is an intriguing result, but not a slam dunk. The 21-cm observations are still in dispute, and there are other possible explanations for the strange signal. Still, this shows how scientists can approach observations like this and continue to push into the frontiers of understanding dark energy and dark matter." -
Unclear Engineer It seems like there is a lot of room between z=17 and the CMBR at 1089. If indeed there was elemental or molecular hydrogen in space between those times, from which the stars formed, shouldn't we be able to look back past z=17 with a powerful enough telescope tuned to the right frequencies to see the red-shifted light from the earliest stars?Reply
Also, what is the basis for the article saying
"the universe has expanded to be about 10 times its previous size. That expansion has stretched the wavelength of that 21-cm radiation, and today, it's now detectable in radio wavelengths. In 2018, a team of astronomers claimed to have detected the 21-cm signal emitted when the universe was only 230 million years old."
Isn't the scale factor more like 1089 for the CMBR and 17 for reionization? Or am I the one confused by the way these parameters get bandied about in the lay media? -
rod Concerning Unclear Engineer post #3, I look and use the cosmology calculators that makes it easier to see the FLRW math in GR for expansion. We have the look back distance or light time distance from Earth today, the comoving radial distance, and the angular size of the universe radius too. A redshift of 17 shows the radius of the universe to be about 1.94 Gly so diameter about 4 Gly across compared to the present size, now considered to be some 93 Gly diameter using comoving radial distance and using look back distance, about 27 Gly diameter as seen and measured from Earth. As you have pointed out in the past, where is the H-alpha line in the CMBR, I also ask for He too. I have reports that show redshifts in BB cosmology are calculated out to 3 million or more for the z values, well before CMBR forms with redshift near 1090-1100 used.Reply -
rod FYI, using cosmology calculators and z=1100 for CMBR redshift, universe radius about 41 Mly so diameter then about 82 Mly across. Redshift of 17, universe radius about 1.94 Gly so diameter about 4 Gly. As post #3 called attention too,Reply
From the radius of the universe when CMBR becomes light to the radius of the universe at z=17, we have space expanding much faster than c velocity here too :) Just consider the size change in light-years and a time period of 300 Myr. -
rod
"It seems like there is a lot of room between z=17 and the CMBR at 1089."Unclear Engineer said:It seems like there is a lot of room between z=17 and the CMBR at 1089. If indeed there was elemental or molecular hydrogen in space between those times, from which the stars formed, shouldn't we be able to look back past z=17 with a powerful enough telescope tuned to the right frequencies to see the red-shifted light from the earliest stars?
Also, what is the basis for the article saying
"the universe has expanded to be about 10 times its previous size. That expansion has stretched the wavelength of that 21-cm radiation, and today, it's now detectable in radio wavelengths. In 2018, a team of astronomers claimed to have detected the 21-cm signal emitted when the universe was only 230 million years old."
Isn't the scale factor more like 1089 for the CMBR and 17 for reionization? Or am I the one confused by the way these parameters get bandied about in the lay media?
IMO, that is a very good statement here. The *natural* evolution of the universe from the time the CMBR appears as light in BB model until z=17 in the report cited, the size of the universe expands much faster than c in BB model. This period of cosmic evolution seems difficult to see today from Earth :)