Astronomers weigh ancient galaxies' dark matter haloes for 1st time

Scientists think that dark matter produces a bright and spherical halo of X-ray emission around the center of the Milky Way.
Artist illustration of a dark matter halo. (Image credit: Artistic rendering by Christopher Dessert, Nicholas L. Rodd, Benjamin R. Safdi, Zosia Rostomian (Berkeley Lab), based on data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope.)

A team of astronomers has, for the first time, "weighed" dark matter haloes surrounding actively feeding supermassive black holes in the bright hearts of ancient galaxies.

These black hole-powered hearts, or quasars, are often brighter than the combined light of every star in the galaxies around them. These super luminous central regions are "fired up" when supermassive black holes, which can have masses billions of times that of the sun, start greedily feeding on surrounding matter. 

And according to a new study, scientists suggest dark matter haloes around such active galaxies could help funnel matter toward the central black hole, acting as a cosmic delivery service helping feed the titans. This new work indicates that such a feeding mechanism was indeed at work around hundreds of ancient quasars and suggests the process is one that's  been constant throughout the history of the universe

Related: Dark matter 'clumps' found by tapping into Einstein's general relativity theory

"We measured for the first time the typical mass for dark matter halos surrounding an active black hole in the universe about 13 billion years ago," Nobunari Kashikawa, team leader and professor at the University of Tokyo’s Department of Astronomy, said in a statement. "We find the dark matter halo mass of quasars is pretty constant at about 10 trillion times the mass of our sun. Such measurements have been made for more recent dark matter halo mass around quasars, and those measurements are strikingly similar to what we see for more ancient quasars. 

"This is interesting because it suggests there is a characteristic dark matter halo mass which seems to activate a quasar, regardless of whether it happened billions of years ago or right now."

Not only is that unexpected, but because supermassive black holes at the hearts of galaxies strongly influence the formation of stars and the growth of galaxies in general, this could have a profound impact on scientists' understanding of how galaxies grew in the early universe and, thus, how the cosmos evolved.

Weighing up the dark matter content of ancient galaxies

Diagram shows the mass of dark matter haloes around quasars at the heart of ancient active galaxies.  (Image credit: Arita et al. CC BY)

The nature of dark matter is a pressing problem for science because, despite making up around 85% of all matter in our universe, it doesn’t interact with light and thus remains effectively invisible to us.

Astronomers can infer the presence of dark matter via its gravitational effects and the influence of this effect on standard everyday matter that comprises stars, cosmic dust and gas clouds,  planets in galaxies as well as on light passing through those galaxies. This elusive gravitational effect ultimately led scientists to the realization that most galaxies must be wrapped in a dark matter halo of sorts. With only the gravity of visible matter within them, galaxies would not be able to hold together while rotating at great speeds.

But even as these dark matter inference techniques are refined, measuring the mass of this unseeable substance in haloes around nearby galaxies is tricky. And measuring dark matter around more distant, and thus early, galaxies has been proven more challenging because  light coming from these galaxies is so faint. 

Kashikawa wasn't about to let these challenges phase him, however. He and his team wanted to better understand how black holes grew in the early universe, and thanks to the brightness of hundreds of the largest and most powerful of these supermassive black holes fueling quasars, the researchers were able to measure the dark matter haloes around ancient galaxies for the first time.

Light emanating from these ancient quasars has taken up to 13 billion years to travel the cosmos and reach over telescopes. During the epic journey, this light has lost energy, and its wavelengths have been stretched, shifting them down past the red end of the visible light spectrum and transforming them into infrared light wavelengths  —  a process astronomers call "redshift." 

In 2016, Kashikawa and the team started collecting infrared data from a range of astronomical surveys conducted by a variety of instruments, primarily the Subaru Telescope at the summit of Maunakea, Hawaii.

This allowed them to see how the light from these quasars had been altered by the gravitational influence of dark matter, which, like all matter with mass, warps the fabric of space and thus causes the path of light to curve  —  a process astronomers call gravitational lensing. Measuring the degree of warping and comparing this to the amount of warping that should arise as a result of the mass of everyday matter in the form of gas, dust and stars in these galaxies reveals the mass of hidden dark matter.

"Upgrades allowed Subaru to see farther than ever, but we can learn more by expanding observation projects internationally," Kashikawa added. "The U.S.-based Vera C. Rubin Observatory and even the space-based Euclid satellite, launched by the EU this year, will scan a larger area of the sky and find more DMH around quasars. 

"We can build a more complete picture of the relationship between galaxies and supermassive black holes. That might help inform our theories about how black holes form and grow."

The team’s work was published Sept. 8 in The Astrophysical Journal.  

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • Questioner
    Again, they are measuring pure gravity/curvature/mass ONLY.
    Mass is by definition the gravitational effect (presumably) 'caused' by matter.
    What they failed to understand is if one tries to correlate this mass with any kind of matter one comes up with provably erroneous nonsense.
    This is raw gravity without any identifiable 'cause'.
    That does not mean there isn't a cause, but it could be external to the observable universe,
    and the cause can NOT be is any kind of matter.
    https://forums.space.com/threads/dark-matter-is-provably-wrong.62921/The universe is not absolutely closed as a system as proved by Godel, because observers of the 'Universe' are a self referencing element of that same 'universe'.
    Please get up to speed with the math, guys n gals.
    Reply
  • Ryan F. Mercer
    Questioner said:
    Again, they are measuring pure gravity/curvature/mass ONLY.
    Mass is by definition the gravitational effect (presumably) 'caused' by matter.
    What they failed to understand is if one tries to correlate this mass with any kind of matter one comes up with provably erroneous nonsense.
    This is raw gravity without any identifiable 'cause'.
    That does not mean there isn't a cause, but it could be external to the observable universe,
    and the cause can NOT be is any kind of matter.
    https://forums.space.com/threads/dark-matter-is-provably-wrong.62921/The universe is not absolutely closed as a system as proved by Godel, because observers of the 'Universe' are a self referencing element of that same 'universe'.
    Please get up to speed with the math, guys n gals.
    What's your background? Are you a mathematician? A physicist? An astrophysics? Do you really think the trained scientists with university degrees in the related subject matter somehow forgot basic mathematic principles in their peer reviewed study? Why aren't you on the team? Why aren't you published? Why are spouting off about it in a comment section with no mathematical formulas to support your assertions? Oh wait... I think I know.
    Reply
  • Questioner
    Ryan F. Mercer said:
    What's your background? Are you a mathematician? A physicist? An astrophysics? Do you really think the trained scientists with university degrees in the related subject matter somehow forgot basic mathematic principles in their peer reviewed study? Why aren't you on the team? Why aren't you published? Why are spouting off about it in a comment section with no mathematical formulas to support your assertions? Oh wait... I think I know.
    Sheepskins don't do logic, working brains (thinking systems) do.
    Social consensus is not science.
    You do understand that you are dailing it in on hearsay, without critically examining my reasoned argument.
    Hearsay is anathema to science.
    I figured out the four color map theorem is a graph problem,
    so what have you done (of objective substance) beyond shove ad homiem inuendo at me?
    Reply
  • Torbjorn Larsson
    Questioner said:
    Sheepskins don't do logic, working brains (thinking systems) do.
    Social consensus is not science.
    You do understand that you are dailing it in on hearsay, without critically examining my reasoned argument.
    Hearsay is anathema to science.
    I figured out the four color map theorem is a graph problem,
    so what have you done (of objective substance) beyond shove ad homiem inuendo at me?
    There isn't any reasoned, quantified analysis (argument) - or question - to examine. As Ryan noted, you present no evidence for your assertions.

    In other news, we have long known that dark matter is clumpy - not at all what matter-less models predict - and that a team now observed a new type of them. .

    Nitpick: Math are constructed (axiomatic) tools, sometimes useful in science but devoid of an empiric basis. Like your comment was.
    Reply
  • Questioner
    Torbjorn Larsson said:
    There isn't any reasoned, quantified analysis (argument) - or question - to examine. As Ryan noted, you present no evidence for your assertions.

    In other news, we have long known that dark matter is clumpy - not at all what matter-less models predict - and that a team now observed a new type of them. .

    Nitpick: Math are constructed (axiomatic) tools, sometimes useful in science but devoid of an empiric basis. Like your comment was.
    They are measuring the non uniform distribution of gravity, period.
    Since these are the proposed locations of this hypothesized matter its gravitational and inertia characteristics should be estimable.
    'Dark matter' has self contradicting properties in terms of gravity.
    Not just unusual,
    but it would contradict its own response to some gravity with a different response to other gravity.
    Excuse me,
    but that's ridiculous.
    Be wrong.
    Future generations will look back at you with mirth.
    :D
    Reply
  • Questioner
    Ancillary thought,
    Piling up enough fluid hydrogen to form a star seems challenging to me.
    What if many/most/all stars get a starter assist from a preexisting gravity divit?
    Just a thought.
    Reply