This 'tarantula' in space could teach us the secrets of dark matter

a pinwheel shaped pink galaxy diffusing gently into black darkness at the edges
The Tarantula Nebula taken by the Super Pressure Balloon Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT) after its first launch on April 16, 2023. (Image credit: NASA/SuperBIT)

A balloon-based telescope may help astronomers unravel the mysteries of dark matter after its first images of the cosmos from the edge of space. 

The Super Pressure Balloon Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT) was carried to an altitude high over Earth's atmosphere on April 16 by a NASA helium balloon the size of a football field. It was the first operational flight by the stratospheric observer.

The first images taken on the flight include a region of the Large Magellanic Cloud, which is a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, called the Tarantula Nebula. The galaxy is located around 160,000 light years from Earth. This massive 931 light-year-wide cloud of gas and dust is a region of intense star formation. (For perspective, the nearest star system is about four light-years away from Earth.)

Related: How much of the universe is dark matter?

SuperBIT also caught images of the Antennae galaxies, NGC 4038 and NGC 4039, located around 60 million light-years away towards the southern constellation of Corvus. These galaxies are seen undergoing a collision and merger that astronomers suspect began a few hundred million years ago. The Antenna galaxies are thus the nearest and youngest examples of a pair of colliding galaxies.

The main aim of SuperBIT will be to capture images of galaxies in the visible-to-near ultraviolet light spectrum. While the Hubble Space Telescope's capabilities cover that band, SuperBIT has a wider field of view than the space telescope launched in 1990.

Related: Hubble Space Telescope spies odd pair of galaxies near Big Dipper (photo)

The Antennae Galaxies taken by the Super Pressure Balloon Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT). (Image credit: NASA/SuperBIT)

How SuperBIT will investigate dark matter

SuperBIT's investigation take advantage of a natural phenomenon called gravitational lensing, to map dark matter. Gravitational lensing was first predicted in Einstein's theory of general relativity. It happens because, just like balls of increasing mass placed on a stretched rubber sheet, objects of tremendous mass like galaxies warp the fabric of spacetime.

When light passes along this curvature, its path is bent. This curving of light can magnify objects, and it can also tell astronomers a lot about the massive object doing the lensing, particularly how the object's mass is distributed.

Six different images from the Hubble Space Telescope have been magnified by a cosmic effect called gravitational lensing. The images were taken in infrared light by Hubble's Wide Field Camera 3. Color has been added to highlight details in the galaxies.  (Image credit: NASA/ESA/J. Lowenthal (Smith College))

Dark matter doesn't interact with electromagnetic radiation or light as ordinary matter that surrounds us on a day-to-day basis does. This makes dark matter virtually invisible, but thanks to the fact it does interact with gravity, astronomers can infer its presence.

Gravitational lensing is thus an excellent way to map dark matter's distribution. SuperBIT could help scientists determine if dark matter particles can bounce off each other, when neighboring galactic clusters collide. This research could finally reveal what particles make up dark matter.

"It takes the gravity from an entire galaxy to move dark matter, and SuperBIT will look at clusters of galaxies that happen to be colliding with each other. Essentially, we're using the largest particle accelerators in the universe, to smash lumps of dark matter and see where the bits fly," Durham University professor of physics, Richard Massey, said in a statement. "If dark matter goes 'crunch', or if bits are chipped off, we could finally start to learn what it’s made of."

Related: Is the origin of dark matter gravity itself?

An illustration of deep space. (Image credit: agsandrew/Getty Images)

Advantages of a balloon-based telescope

SuperBIT, which is a collaboration between NASA, Durham University in the U.K., Canada’s University of Toronto, and Princeton University in the U.S., launched from Wānaka, New Zealand.

The telescope and its super-pressure balloon ride can circumnavigate the globe at an altitude of around 21 miles (34 kilometers) above over 99.5% of Earth’s atmosphere for 100 days. From that vantage point, it collects scientific data and takes high-resolution images. The balloon's high-altitude view provides a clearer view of light that has traveled billions of years from galaxies in the distant and early universe, unhindered by the blurring effect of the atmosphere.

The SuperBIT balloon in flight, above NASA's Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility, Texas, in June 2016. (Image credit: Richard Massey/Durham University (CC BY 4.0))

SuperBIT can be safely returned to Earth by parachute, so that the team can update its design. The SuperBIT team has already acquired funding to upgrade the 1.6 feet (0.5-meter) aperture telescope to 5.2 feet (1.6 meters), adding a wider-angle lens and increased megapixels for the camera. The improvement will boost its light-gathering power by 10 times.

A balloon-carried telescope is more economical than a rocket-launched instrument. SuperBIT cost about $5 million, which is almost 1,000 times less than an equivalent satellite mission. The relatively cheap cost of SuperBIT could allow a fleet of such telescopes to eventually glide over Earth, probing the mysteries of the universe, according to NASA officials.

Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or Facebook.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • rod
    Interesting to follow efforts to study and define DM. Here is another recent report using gravitational lensing.

    New look at 'Einstein rings' around distant galaxies just got us closer to solving the dark matter debate, https://phys.org/news/2023-04-einstein-distant-galaxies-closer-dark.html
    Ref - Einstein rings modulated by wavelike dark matter from anomalies in gravitationally lensed images, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01943-9, 20-April-2023.

    My note. The NASA ADS Abstract has a 2002 report on this QSO lensing. Discovery of a new quadruply lensed QSO: HS 0810+2554 - A brighter twin to PG 1115+080, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A%26A...382L..26R/abstract, January 2002.

    "We announce the probable discovery of a new very bright gravitationally lensed QSO, HS 0810+2554 (z=1.50, V=15.3). The gravitational lens character has been discovered serendipitously by means of short (12 times 1 s) HST/STIS target acquisition images. The coadded images show a close bright double A (V=16.0) and B (16.7) separated by 0.25 arcsec plus two fainter images C (17.4) and D (18.8). There is also evidence for a lens galaxy in the center of the images which is fainter than A by a factor of le 30 at 7150 Å. The image configuration resembles very much that of PG 1115+080 except that in HS 0810+2554 image splittings (<=1'') are smaller by a factor of ~ 2.5 and HS 0810+2554 is brighter by ~ 1{m}. Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by Aura, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26 555 and on observations at the German - Spanish Astronomical Center (DSAZ) on Calar Alto, Spain."

    My note. The cosmology calculators show comoving radial distance for z=1.5, space must expand faster than c velocity, 1.0209580E+00 or 1.02 x c velocity. The current report in phys.org favors axions as the particles to explain DM as modeled using QSO HS 0810+2554. More observations I feel are needed here. In the solar system, the heliocentric solar system does not need axions or wimps to explain planet motion, same for detailed observations of more than 5300 exoplanets. The BB model does not explain the origin of DM (whether WIMPS, AXIONS, or something else) and does not explain the origin of physical law and constants found in nature. The GR metric for expanding space did not use DM or DE originally and cosmology calculators can be used without DM or DE too. It seems we should soon be able to clearly define what DM is from these new efforts reported. A consistent view is needed or perhaps DM simply does not exist. Following SuperBIT reports and comparing with others should be very interesting.
    Reply
  • jamestmallow
    rod said:
    Interesting to follow efforts to study and define DM. Here is another recent report using gravitational lensing.

    New look at 'Einstein rings' around distant galaxies just got us closer to solving the dark matter debate, https://phys.org/news/2023-04-einstein-distant-galaxies-closer-dark.html
    Ref - Einstein rings modulated by wavelike dark matter from anomalies in gravitationally lensed images, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01943-9, 20-April-2023.

    My note. The NASA ADS Abstract has a 2002 report on this QSO lensing. Discovery of a new quadruply lensed QSO: HS 0810+2554 - A brighter twin to PG 1115+080, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...382L..26R/abstract, January 2002.

    "We announce the probable discovery of a new very bright gravitationally lensed QSO, HS 0810+2554 (z=1.50, V=15.3). The gravitational lens character has been discovered serendipitously by means of short (12 times 1 s) HST/STIS target acquisition images. The coadded images show a close bright double A (V=16.0) and B (16.7) separated by 0.25 arcsec plus two fainter images C (17.4) and D (18.8). There is also evidence for a lens galaxy in the center of the images which is fainter than A by a factor of le 30 at 7150 Å. The image configuration resembles very much that of PG 1115+080 except that in HS 0810+2554 image splittings (<=1'') are smaller by a factor of ~ 2.5 and HS 0810+2554 is brighter by ~ 1{m}. Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by Aura, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26 555 and on observations at the German - Spanish Astronomical Center (DSAZ) on Calar Alto, Spain."

    My note. The cosmology calculators show comoving radial distance for z=1.5, space must expand faster than c velocity, 1.0209580E+00 or 1.02 x c velocity. The current report in phys.org favors axions as the particles to explain DM as modeled using QSO HS 0810+2554. More observations I feel are needed here. In the solar system, the heliocentric solar system does not need axions or wimps to explain planet motion, same for detailed observations of more than 5300 exoplanets. The BB model does not explain the origin of DM (whether WIMPS, AXIONS, or something else) and does not explain the origin of physical law and constants found in nature. The GR metric for expanding space did not use DM or DE originally and cosmology calculators can be used without DM or DE too. It seems we should soon be able to clearly define what DM is from these new efforts reported. A consistent view is needed or perhaps DM simply does not exist. Following SuperBIT reports and comparing with others should be very interesting.
    Then what holds galaxies and clusters together ? Does Relativity not apply at large scale ?
    Reply
  • rod
    jamestmallow said:
    Then what holds galaxies and clusters together ? Does Relativity not apply at large scale ?
    Why should galaxies and clusters be held together?
    Reply
  • jamestmallow
    rod said:
    Why should galaxies and clusters be held together?
    If there is no dark matter then there is not enough mass to hold them together - right ? So either dark matter exists or our understanding of gravity breaks down at that scale.
    Reply
  • rod
    jamestmallow said:
    If there is no dark matter then there is not enough mass to hold them together - right ? So either dark matter exists or our understanding of gravity breaks down at that scale.
    I do not see where gravity breaks down, just galaxies and clusters are not held together. How long will they be held together using gravity?
    Reply
  • rod
    FYI, my question in #6 gets into how long can galaxy spiral arms last as an example? What is their max lifetime? We can still have gravity.
    Reply