Did the Tonga undersea volcano eruption cause this year's extreme heat?

A massive volcano eruption seen from space
The 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai volcano eruption as seen by a satellite in Earth orbit. (Image credit: NOAA and the National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS))

The Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption in January 2022 was one of the biggest volcanic eruptions in recorded history. Detonating underwater with the force of 100 Hiroshima bombs, the blast sent millions of tons of water vapor high into the atmosphere.

Some commentators have speculated in recent weeks that the volcano is to blame for searing summer temperatures and are even using the volcano to cast doubt on the role humans are playing in climate change, as reported by The Hill.

So is the gigantic eruption responsible for this summer's sweltering conditions?

"The short answer is no," Gloria Manney, a senior research scientist at NorthWest Research Associates and New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, and Luis Millán, a research scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told Live Science together in an email.

"Even though El Niño has made the global temperature higher and the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption might have affected some regions for a short time, the main culprit is climate change," they said.

And numerous studies show that the massive eruption isn't causing this climate change — human activites such as the burning of fossil fuels are the driving factor.

Related: Tonga eruption's towering plume was the tallest in recorded history

Why are some people blaming the volcano?

Massive volcanic eruptions usually reduce temperatures because they spit out vast amounts of sulfur dioxide, which form sulfate aerosols that can reflect sunlight back into space and cool Earth's surface temporarily, the researchers explained. But the Tonga eruption had another effect because it occurred underwater.

"The Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption is peculiar because, in addition to causing the largest increase in stratospheric aerosol in decades, it also injected vast amounts of water vapor into the stratosphere," Manney and Millán said.

Water vapor is a natural greenhouse gas that absorbs solar radiation and traps heat in the atmosphere. The aerosol and water vapor impact the climate system in opposing ways, but several studies have proposed that, due to its larger and more persistent water vapor plume, the eruption could have a temporary net surface warming effect, Manney and Millán said.

A study published in the journal Nature Climate Change in January estimated that the eruption increased the water vapor content of the stratosphere by around 10% to 15% — the biggest increase scientists have ever documented. Using a model, they calculated that the water vapor could increase the average global temperature by up to 0.063 degrees Fahrenheit (0.035 degrees Celsius), Eos magazine reported in March.

Some commentators linked the eruption to warming because of this finding, and other studies suggesting a potential warming effect, but researchers involved in these studies have been clear that the volcano isn't a major factor in our wild weather.

"It's probably fair to say that the influence of [the volcano] on this year's extremes is quite small," Stuart Jenkins, a climate scientist and postdoctoral researcher at Oxford University in the U.K. and lead author of the January study, told The Hill.

 Sea-level view of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai volcano erupting. (Image credit: Tonga Geological Services)

The bigger climate picture

Earth's warming trend predates the eruption. July may have been the hottest month on record for global temperatures, but the five hottest Julys have all been recorded in the past five years, according to NASA.

Manney and Millán said that more detailed models are needed to reveal how much impact the eruption had on global temperatures relative to burning fossil fuels and the El Niño, but the effects are expected to be much smaller than those from burning fossil fuels.

"Last July's record-breaking global temperatures are just a preview of what may happen if we do not take more bold and ambitious climate action," they said.

In May, the United Nations' World Meteorological Organization warned there's a 66% chance that annual mean global surface temperatures will likely cross a dangerous 2.6 F (1.5 C) warming threshold at some point in the next five years.

At 2.6 F of warming, extreme heat waves will become more widespread, with higher chances of droughts and reduced water availability, according to NASA.

Going above 2.6 F could trigger climate tipping points such as the collapse of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Staff Writer

Patrick Pester is a freelance writer for Space and previously a staff writer at Live Science. His background is in wildlife conservation and he has worked with endangered species around the world. Patrick holds a master's degree in international journalism from Cardiff University in the U.K.

  • Toado
    Just the sort of article headline the world needs less of. Thanks so much for giving the climate deniers yet another stick to beat the planet with, because none of them will read the article. Dumb thing to do.
    Reply
  • sciencecompliance
    Toado said:
    Just the sort of article headline the world needs less of. Thanks so much for giving the climate deniers yet another stick to beat the planet with, because none of them will read the article. Dumb thing to do.

    Well, it apparently did affect the weather with increased heat to some extent, and volcanic eruptions have changed the climate historically, so it's not a terrible question to ask. The climate deniers will concoct anything to support their narrative. That shouldn't stop us from asking reasonable questions.
    Reply
  • Ken Fabian
    sciencecompliance said:
    Well, it apparently did affect the weather with increased heat to some extent, and volcanic eruptions have changed the climate historically, so it's not a terrible question to ask. The climate deniers will concoct anything to support their narrative. That shouldn't stop us from asking reasonable questions.


    Three years in a row of La Nina conditions coming to an end is enough to give a spike of apparent warming, on top of the underlying global warming. The full effects of the developing el Nino won't be felt until later this year and early next, so attribution to that seems unlikely. But, like stepping up and down on a rising escalotor expect more records being broken when ENSO does a step up from la Nina to neutral and another step up with el Nino.

    Probably has been made a bit warmer by the raised stratospheric water vapor from the Tonga volcano (but not that much) as well as reduced shipping pollution (that masks warming) by stricter rules on using high sulfur fuels. I expect a spike in global temperatures by these combining but lasting change to the rate of warming? That will still depend most of all on emissions - which are still rising, just not as fast as before. I would like to believe we are approaching the turning point, with new renewables not just displacing FF growth but reducing overall FF use.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    Thermal drilling is cheap (1% that of drilling), quick - 10 times faster through granite, can be done anywhere, eliminates drill bit, mud, casing, goes 100 km deep. Any conventional power plant (coal, oil, gas, nuke) can have its fuel source replaced for about $1M. Endless, free, safe, no pollution. If this works, it will user in a revolution.
    Reply
  • Scholar King
    The article was apparently written by the administrator. I don't know what his/her level of expertise is but the premise of the article looks to be based on presumptions that the climate change is primarily man made..
    Do any of the climate religion zealots factor in the two percent increase in the world's atmospheric moisture content on the global scale. The earth has been warming ever since the end of the last ice age. I submit that the global warming is primarily natural and inevitable. I also submit that the Hunga Tonga eruption increasing the Earth's atmospheric moisture more than two percent has reversed and delayed the global warming trend for at least three to seven years. That is probably a good thing. Please stop casing on American fossil fuel producers. If you want to make a significant impact, lobby against China. It is time we discussed that impact since the dirty air blows right across the Pacific ocean right into our hemisphere.
    Two percent atmospheric butterfly effect.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    If you use thermal drilling, you will release the lizard people.
    Reply