The ancient Egyptian goddess of the sky and how I used modern astronomy to explore her link with the Milky Way
This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
Or Graur is an associate professor of Astrophysics at the University of Portsmouth's Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, an honorary associate professor at University College London (UCL), and a research associate at the American Museum of Natural History.
What did our ancestors think when they looked up at the night sky? All cultures ascribed special meaning to the sun and the moon, but what about the pearly band of light and shadow we call the Milky Way?
My recent study showed an intriguing link between an Egyptian goddess and the Milky Way.
Slowly, scholars are putting together a picture of Egyptian astronomy. The god Sah has been linked to stars in the Orion constellation, while the goddess Sopdet has been linked to the star Sirius. Where we see a plough (or the big dipper), the Egyptians saw the foreleg of a bull. But the Milky Way’s Egyptian name and its relation to Egyptian culture have long been a mystery.
Related: Ancient rocks hold proof of Earth's magnetic field. Here's why that's puzzling
Several scholars have suggested that the Milky Way was linked to Nut, the Egyptian goddess of the sky who swallowed the sun as it set and gave birth to it once more as it rose the next day. But their attempts to map different parts of Nut's body onto sections of the Milky Way were inconsistent with each other and didn't match the ancient Egyptian texts.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
In a paper published in the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, I compared descriptions of the goddess in the Pyramid Texts, Coffin Texts, and the Book of Nut to simulations of the Milky Way’s appearance in the ancient Egyptian night sky.
Carved onto the walls of the pyramids more than 4,000 years ago, the Pyramid Texts are a collection of spells to aid the kings’ journey to the afterlife. Painted on coffins a few hundred years after the age of the pyramids, the Coffin Texts were a similar collection of spells. The Book of Nut described Nut’s role in the solar cycle. It has been found in several monuments and papyri, and its oldest version dates back some 3,000 years ago.
The Book of Nut described Nut's head and groin as the western and eastern horizons, respectively. It also described how she swallowed not only the sun but also a series of so-called "decanal" stars that are thought to have been used to tell time during the night.
From this description, I concluded that Nut's head and groin had to be locked to the horizons so that she could give birth and later swallow the decanal stars as they rose and set throughout the night. This meant that she could never be mapped directly onto the Milky Way, whose different sections rise and set as well.
I did, however, find a possible link to the Milky Way in the orientation of Nut's arms. The Book of Nut describes Nut's right arm as lying in the northwest and her left arm in the southeast at a 45 degree angle to her body. My simulations of the Egyptian night sky using the planetarium software Cartes du Ciel and Stellarium revealed that this orientation was precisely that of the Milky Way during the winter in ancient Egypt.
The Milky Way is not a physical manifestation of Nut. Instead, it may have been used as a figurative way to highlight Nut's presence as the sky.
During the winter, it showed Nut's arms. In the summer (when its orientation flips by 90 degrees) the Milky Way sketched out her backbone. Nut is often portrayed in tomb murals and funerary papyri as a naked, arched woman, a portrayal that resembles the arch of the Milky Way.
However, Nut is also portrayed in ancient texts as a cow, a hippopotamus and a vulture, thought to highlight her motherly attributes. Along the same lines, the Milky Way could be thought of as highlighting Nut's celestial attributes.
The ancient Egyptian texts also describe Nut as a ladder or as reaching out her arms to help guide the deceased up to the sky on their way to the afterlife. Many cultures around the world, such as the Lakota and Pawnee in North America and the Quiché Maya in Central America, see the Milky Way as a spirits’ road.
The Book of Nut also describes the annual bird migration into Egypt and ties it both to the netherworld and to Nut. This section of the Book of Nut describes Ba birds flying into Egypt from Nut's northeast and northwest sides before turning into regular birds to feed in Egypt’s marshes. The Egyptians considered the Ba, portrayed as a human-headed bird, to be the aspect of a person that imbued it with individuality (similar, but not identical, to the modern Western concept of the “soul”).
The Bas of the dead were free to leave and return to the netherworld as they wished. Nut is often shown standing in a sycamore tree and providing food and water to the deceased and their Ba.
Once again, several cultures across the Baltics and northern Europe (including the Finns, Lithuanians, and Sámi) view the Milky Way as the path along which birds migrate before winter. While these links don’t prove a connection between Nut and the Milky Way, they show that such a connection would place Nut comfortably within the global mythology of the Milky Way.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
I am an associate professor of Astrophysics at the University of Portsmouth's Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, an honorary associate professor at University College London (UCL), and a research associate at the American Museum of Natural History. I study different types of transients – astrophysical phenomena that change on human timescales. I mostly work on supernovae (the explosions of stars) and tidal disurption events (bright flares caused by stars being shredded by supermassive black holes). My books include [Supernova](https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262543149/supernova/) and [Galaxies](https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262548755/galaxies/)._
-
NHEngineer I'm curious to know what kind of wooden boat can transport a 200 ton block of granite.Reply -
NHEngineer How much area does a 200 ton pyramid block of granite have? Don't be ridiculous. How many forests would need to be flattened to make a raft big enough and strong enough to displace 200 tons of water carrying it . A gallon of water is 8.33 pounds. 400,000 pounds of water is 48,019 gallons. That's 11092389 cubic inches. Granite is 67.9936 pound per cubic foot. A 200 ton block is 5882 cu-ft. That's 18 foot in three dimensions. Your comment about an inch of water is troubling and I doubt it was serious.Reply -
Unclear Engineer You would need a barge about 100' x 65' in area sink down a foot to displace 200 tons of water.Reply
That seems doable. What amazes me is that they could move a 200 ton block of granite across land and up ramps.
BTW, granite is about 2.6 times the density of water, so a cubic foot of granite weighs about 160 pounds. -
Classical Motion I am only as serous and as troubling as the principle is. Increase the block area with a platform. A large platform. A barge perhaps. If you do add water depth, you may decrease the platform area. It's a trade. A ratio. My example needs lots of area, that's all.Reply -
Classical Motion I believe they have determined how the great pyramid was built. At least it satisfies me. I like it.Reply
But how they moved those huge rectangular foundation blocks at other locations baffle me too. The only thing I can see is counter weights. But how did they move and set the counterweights? Unless they learned how to exchange big weight/small distance into little weight/long distance. OR visa versa. And repeat it. We are missing the pivot. The exchange point. The tool. -
NHEngineer
How many wooden barges and wooden sleds would be needed to move 3 million, 200 ton blocks of granite to the job site in 20 years? Where would the lumber come from since there is a scarcity of forests in the Saraha? This whole assumption is ridiculous. I doubt the Egyptians had any part in building the pyramids based on the preceding and the FACT that there is not one single hieroglyph that mentions a pyramid.Unclear Engineer said:You would need a barge about 100' x 65' in area sink down a foot to displace 200 tons of water.
That seems doable. What amazes me is that they could move a 200 ton block of granite across land and up ramps.
BTW, granite is about 2.6 times the density of water, so a cubic foot of granite weighs about 160 pounds.
How many Pharo mummies have been found in the pyramids? It is all know-it-all, PhD generated conjecture, supposition and theory with no basis in fact. -
COLGeek
So your theory of construction is what?NHEngineer said:How many wooden barges and wooden sleds would be needed to move 3 million, 200 ton blocks of granite to the job site in 20 years? Where would the lumber come from since there is a scarcity of forests in the Saraha? This whole assumption is ridiculous. I doubt the Egyptians had any part in building the pyramids based on the preceding and the FACT that there is not one single hieroglyph that mentions a pyramid.
How many Pharo mummies have been found in the pyramids? It is all know-it-all, PhD generated conjecture, supposition and theory with no basis in fact. -
Unclear Engineer NHEngineer, as an engineer, you should be able to make the calculations needed to answer the questions you posed in your post.Reply
BTW, where did you get the value of 200 tons for the largest stone block in the pyramids? A quick search turned up this https://www.quora.com/How-heavy-is-the-heaviest-stone-in-the-pyramids , which says "The heaviest stone in the pyramids of Egypt is estimated to weigh around 80 tons." And this "The largest granite stones in the pyramid, found in the "King's" chamber, weigh 25 to 80 Tonnes and were transported from Aswan, more than 800 km (500 mi) away."
That link also says "there are larger blocks recorded in the associated ‘temples’ …where foundation stones have been reported at 100–200 tonnes. Reisner specifically reported that blocks in the ‘mortuary temple’ of Mycerinus at Giza weighed up to 220 tonnes. " -
nathanielsalzman If any of you would like actual data from how they built the pyramids, check out the book The Red Sea Scrolls, which details the discovery of records kept in-period that explicitly talk about using boats, canals, and purpose-built pools at Giza to transport and stage the materials used in building the pyramids. They found what amounts to ancient spreadsheets that paint a robust picture of how massive amounts of material were moved vast distances and then essentially delivered to the front door of the build sites, all by water.Reply
Separately, this article seems to miss the mythical tie in to the Egyptian goddess Hathor, who like Nut is portrayed as a sacred cow. She is also depicted as nursing the Pharaoh and milk was often given as an offering to her. In some accounts, her milk is the literal origin of name "milky way".