Nearby exoplanet may be rich in life-giving water, study finds
'If it's confirmed in the future, that would be the first indirect detection of liquid water on an exoplanet.'
An exoplanet orbiting a small star some 50 light-years away from Earth may be a life-friendly water world, a new study has revealed — and the James Webb Space Telescope could determine if that is indeed the case.
The planet in question, called LHS 1140b, orbits in the habitable zone of a small, dim star called LHS 1140 that lies in the constellation Cetus. The exoplanet was discovered in 2017 and has been observed by multiple telescopes since.
These observations first convinced researchers that LHS 1140b is a rocky planet about 1.7 times wider than Earth. But a new analysis of all available observations has shown that LHS 1140b is not dense enough to be purely rocky and must either contain much more water than Earth or possess an extensive atmosphere full of light elements such as hydrogen and helium.
Researchers can't yet tell which of the two options is correct, but the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) might be able to find out in the coming years. If LHS 1140b is a water world, then the planet is set to become the number one target in the search for life outside our solar system.
Related: The search for alien life
"Since the planet is in the habitable zone, it's really interesting, because if you had water on the surface of a planet inside the habitable zone, you would expect that some of the water is in the liquid state," Charles Cadieux, an astronomy researcher at the University of Montreal and lead author of the new study, told Space.com. "So that's a really interesting scenario in terms of habitability."
Since the first-ever discovery of an exoplanet in 1992, astronomers have confirmed more than 5,500 worlds orbiting stars in the Milky Way galaxy. Of those known exoplanets, however, only a handful are potentially habitable, said Cadieux.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
For years, the most promising target to search for extrasolar life has been the intriguing system around a small, red star called TRAPPIST-1. A little closer to Earth than LHS 1140, TRAPPIST-1 hosts an impressive collection of seven known Earth-size exoplanets, three of which circle in the star in its habitable zone. But recent observations by JWST have been turning out disappointing results, suggesting that those planets might be completely barren with no atmosphere and no surface water. That, Cadieux said, is not entirely surprising.
"We know that the TRAPPIST-1 star is very active," Cadieux said. "It produces many flares. And the current observations with Webb suggest that these planets may be just balls of rock with no atmosphere and probably no life at all because the star is too active, and all the atmospheres have been stripped off."
The lesser-known LHS 1140 star is much less active than TRAPPIST-1, Cadieux added. At about 20% the size and mass of our sun, LHS 1140 emits barely enough energy to produce habitable conditions in a region closer to its surface than Mercury is from the sun. Planet LHS 1140b is, in fact, thought to be cooler than Earth even though it orbits more than four times closer to its star than the scorching Mercury orbits the sun.
"I think that LHS 1140 is the next most interesting exoplanet system after TRAPPIST-1 in terms of habitability," Cadieux said. "And the results of our study help us to identify what to look for in the future with other programs."
Cadieux said the researchers have applied to study the LHS 1140 system with JWST to investigate whether the exoplanet has an atmosphere full of hydrogen and helium or whether it appears to have an abundance of water. So far, however, no observations have been planned.
"If it could be confirmed in the future that it is a water world, we can do some modelling of the planet's climate to see whether there is liquid water on the surface," said Cadieux. "That would be the first indirect detection of liquid water on an exoplanet, and that would be a very nice discovery."
The study was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters on Jan. 3.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Tereza is a London-based science and technology journalist, aspiring fiction writer and amateur gymnast. Originally from Prague, the Czech Republic, she spent the first seven years of her career working as a reporter, script-writer and presenter for various TV programmes of the Czech Public Service Television. She later took a career break to pursue further education and added a Master's in Science from the International Space University, France, to her Bachelor's in Journalism and Master's in Cultural Anthropology from Prague's Charles University. She worked as a reporter at the Engineering and Technology magazine, freelanced for a range of publications including Live Science, Space.com, Professional Engineering, Via Satellite and Space News and served as a maternity cover science editor at the European Space Agency.
-
rod There are a number of exoplanets reported now that could be *water worlds*. K2-18 b is a recent example where JWST perhaps imaged evidence for biological life on it too.Reply
https://forums.space.com/threads/exoplanets-surface-may-be-covered-in-oceans-james-webb-space-telescope-finds.63084/
From the 22-page PDF report. "4.3. Possible Evidence of Life Our potential evidence for DMS in K2-18 b motivates consideration of possible biological activity on the planet. While the present evidence is not as strong as that for CH4 or CO2, upcoming JWST observations of K2-18 b will be able to robustly constrain the presence and abundance of DMS, as discussed in section 4.5 and earlier work (Madhusudhan et al. 2021). Here we discuss the plausibility of our DMS abundance constraints from a potential biosphere on K2-18 b in order to inform future observations and retrieval studies."
I have not seen follow up reports confirming that K2-18 b is watery and has life on it yet. Need to wait and see what happens with reporting on LHS 1140b exoplanet.
The calculated temperature for LHS 1140 b is 230 K, https://exoplanet.eu/catalog/lhs_1140_b--6561/ -
rod https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/TblView/nph-tblView?app=ExoTbls&config=PSReply
The nasa archive site shows equilibrium temperature 230K and some 378 K too.
https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/overview/LHS%201140%20b#planet_LHS-1140-b_collapsible -
Helio
Perhaps they assigned it incorrectly to the inner planet LHS-1140 c.rod said:https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/TblView/nph-tblView?app=ExoTbls&config=PS
The nasa archive site shows equilibrium temperature 230K and some 378 K too.
https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/overview/LHS%201140%20b#planet_LHS-1140-b_collapsible
But these figures are with a 20% bump in distance on either side of the std. Hz. With no fudge, LHS 1400 b is 78% farther outside the outer Hz limit using the Temp Meth., and almost 3x beyond it using the Std. Meth. (Mag,, star clsss, etc.).
Only the Hz equation for equilibrium temperature gives it hope. It seems likely, as shown, that 1140 b is likely just outside the outer Hz limit. -
Helio In looking at the article's referenced paper, I don't see where they claim it is in the HZ.Reply
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ad1691
-
rod LHS 1140 b is presented as a cold super-earth at this site, showing atmosphere and molecules detected so far, temp 230 K shown.Reply
https://research.iac.es/proyecto/exoatmospheres/view.php?name=LHS%201140%20b -
Helio
Yes, only the "Equilibrium Temp." places it near the middle of the HZ. This model includes a bond albedo, but I think that is all too often assumed to be some a set value, namely 0.3. Earth is 0.306, but Venus is about 2.5 times higher, Mars about 1/3 less.rod said:LHS 1140 b is presented as a cold super-earth at this site, showing atmosphere and molecules detected so far, temp 230 K shown.
https://research.iac.es/proyecto/exoatmospheres/view.php?name=LHS%201140%20b -
AboveAndBeyond How do they know this planet's density, which requires knowledge of its mass as well as its radius; without a moon orbiting it how could anyone get a mass?Reply -
Helio
Radial velocities reveal planetary mass. The tiny wobble of a star caused by the orbiting planet is proportional to masses of both the star and planet. The stellar mass is known from its spectrum.AboveAndBeyond said:How do they know this planet's density, which requires knowledge of its mass as well as its radius; without a moon orbiting it how could anyone get a mass?
Perhaps knowing the size of the planet and its temp. can allow a density estimate, which would also give some idea of its mass. -
AboveAndBeyond
Thanks. My intuition would have supposed the turbulent and convective motions in the star's photosphere (such as granulation) would have prevented anyone from making a measurement at a small enough velocity to detect the mutual orbital motion around the barycenter reflected in the star.Helio said:Radial velocities reveal planetary mass. The tiny wobble of a star caused by the orbiting planet is proportional to masses of both the star and planet. The stellar mass is known from its spectrum.
Perhaps knowing the size of the planet and its temp. can allow a density estimate, which would also give some idea of its mass. -
Helio
It’s amazing how astronomers can detect such tiny motions. These motions are seen in their spectral shifts (red and blueshifts). If one line is disturbed they have plenty more to use as they all shift equally. The Sun has over 25,000 lines.AboveAndBeyond said:Thanks. My intuition would have supposed the turbulent and convective motions in the star's photosphere (such as granulation) would have prevented anyone from making a measurement at a small enough velocity to detect the mutual orbital motion around the barycenter reflected in the star.