Eight former SpaceX employees are suing the company and its founder and CEO, Elon Musk, alleging sexual harassment and whistleblower retaliation, among other wrongdoing.
In June 2022, the eight employees helped distribute an open letter to SpaceX executives that decried Musk's behavior and the purported negative impact it has had on the company and its workplace culture.
"SpaceX summarily terminated them for daring to seek changes that would simply align the workplace culture with the norms of legal civility as defined by state and federal law," states the lawsuit, which was filed Wednesday (June 12) in California state court in Los Angeles. (SpaceX is headquartered in Hawthorne, a city in the L.A. metro area.)
"Upon information and belief, Defendant Musk personally ordered the Plaintiffs' terminations," the 76-page document adds. "This action seeks to hold SpaceX and Musk personally accountable for their gross misconduct."
All eight plaintiffs "experienced exposure to unwanted conduct and comments of a sexual nature by Elon Musk that created a hostile and abusive work environment," according to the lawsuit.
Much of this alleged conduct came via Twitter (now known as X), the social media platform that Musk bought in 2022 for $44 billion. Musk is very active on X, posting frequently from his personal account.
Some of this material is off-color. In October 2021, for example, the billionaire tweeted (it was still called Twitter then) that he was thinking of starting a new university called the "Texas Institute of Technology & Science." The school "will have epic merch," he added in another tweet.
The lawsuit cites this "TITS" university idea and a number of other Musk posts that made their way around the workplace.
"Musk's utterances were quickly circulated by email, Teams channels, and/or word of mouth and widely discussed," the lawsuit states. "On information and belief, Musk knew that his vile and offensive posts permeated the workplace and that management took no action to prevent these posts from entering the workplace and took no action to remove them."
Such posts were part of a "pervasively sexist culture at SpaceX," according to the lawsuit.
"In technical meetings, senior engineers referred to mechanical parts as 'chodes' and 'schlongs' (euphemisms for male genitals)," the document states. "It was also common for engineers to apply crude and demeaning names to products in an attempt at humor, often at the expense of women and LGBTQ individuals."
The 2022 open letter drew attention to the plaintiffs' concerns. Three of the eight plaintiffs were the chief authors of the letter, according to the lawsuit, while the other five "contributed feedback and ideas."
The open letter's creators made it viewable via SpaceX's intranet on June 15, 2022, according to the suit. That same day, it alleges, Musk asked one of his human-resources representatives to travel from Texas to SpaceX HQ in Hawthorne to "deal with" the authors of the letter.
The three chief authors were terminated on June 16, the lawsuit states. SpaceX management then conducted an investigation to identify other key contributors, which led to the firing of the other five plaintiffs over the following two months.
Space.com reached out to SpaceX for comment on this story but has not yet received a response.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Michael Wall is a Senior Space Writer with Space.com and joined the team in 2010. He primarily covers exoplanets, spaceflight and military space, but has been known to dabble in the space art beat. His book about the search for alien life, "Out There," was published on Nov. 13, 2018. Before becoming a science writer, Michael worked as a herpetologist and wildlife biologist. He has a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the University of Sydney, Australia, a bachelor's degree from the University of Arizona, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. To find out what his latest project is, you can follow Michael on Twitter.
-
24Hz if I were EM I'd sue them back for their absent sense of humour. I'm quoting John Cleese here:Reply
Political correctness “started out as a good idea, which is, ‘Let’s not be mean to people’, and I’m in favour of that despite my age.
The main thing is to try to be kind. But that then becomes a sort of indulgence of the most oversensitive people in your culture, the people who are most easily upset … I don’t think we should organise a society around the sensibilities of the most easily upset people, because then you have a very neurotic society.
From the point of creativity, if you have to keep thinking which words you can use and which you can’t, then that will stifle creativity. The main thing is to realise that words depend on their context. Very literal-minded people think a word is a word but it isn’t. -
James Parker I read the letter that underpins the lawsuit. Looks like the whole thing is BS. The letter bemoans a lack of EDI initiatives and denounces Elon's Tweets. That's it. Whistleblowers are protected from termination for reporting criminal acts or sexual harassment. But these guys are simply trashing their boss in front of the whole company. I see nothing in the letter that is protected by federal law, but I'm not an attorney. Looks like Elon is acting correctly to remove people who are attempting to force chance by denouncing the ownership. California law may have something else to say, and Elon may have to write some checks, however. If so, this could actually motivate Elon to move SpaceX headquarters to Texas, where the business climate is favorable, the employee base less progressive and juries are relatively stingy.Reply -
cecilia
Elon isn't a comedian. I've read his tweets. He's not funny.24Hz said:if I were EM I'd sue them back for their absent sense of humour. I'm quoting John Cleese here:
Political correctness “started out as a good idea, which is, ‘Let’s not be mean to people’, and I’m in favour of that despite my age.
At all. HE thinks he's funny. He's deluded.
Comedians should have all the latitude they need to be funny because jokes don't work if they aren't revealing a truth.
A CEO's job is not to tell jokes. Leave that to the professionals. -
Unclear Engineer Musk has been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome, which is on the "Autism spectrum". It is associated with degraded ability to " read the room" and communicate at an emotionally sensitive level.Reply
So, perhaps "progressives" should cut him some slack on his communications that they consider to be "insensitive". After all, aren't "progressives" campaigning for the "disabled" to be fully accepted by society? Or, is being "rich" a disqualifier for their tolerance? -
constellar
Quite the contrary, EM is funny as all hell! There's a problem with a person's cognitive function if he is unable to see the very blatant and high quality humor in EMs posts.cecilia said:Elon isn't a comedian. I've read his tweets. He's not funny.
At all. HE thinks he's funny. He's deluded.
Comedians should have all the latitude they need to be funny because jokes don't work if they aren't revealing a truth.
A CEO's job is not to tell jokes. Leave that to the professionals.
"If I were the president I'd put the cocaine back in Coke..."
Or how about "pronouns suck!" Rofl! 🤣
His TITS University was prolly the funniest of all time! Lol TITS! That dude is just plain funny!... 🤣 -
constellar I have a solution--the final solution, to the question of flirtatious harassment (erroneously referred to as "sexual harassment"): why don't we just enable the employer to include a sentence on the application which reads, "do you find offense, and will you report such offense, whereby one employee or supervising employee may flirt with another employee or supervising employee, or use sex-related metaphor in his speech, such that you will feel compelled to report the flirtatious conduct or sex-related metaphor during the course of a workday?" If the answer is "yes" to this question, the employer should legally be allowed to not consider this applicant for hire.Reply
Taking this approach would make flirtatious harassment a thing of the past.