Massive galaxy with no dark matter is a cosmic puzzle
"This result does not fit in with the currently accepted cosmological models, which include dark matter."
Our picture of cosmic evolution could be thrown into doubt by the discovery of a massive galaxy that seems to lack dark matter.
Dark matter, which accounts for around 85% of the matter in the universe, seems to be absent from the galaxy NGC 1277, part of the Perseus Cluster of galaxies. The galaxy, located 240 million light-years from Earth, is the first Milky Way-sized conglomeration of stars, planets, dust and gas found to be missing dark matter.
"This result does not fit in with the currently accepted cosmological models, which include dark matter," the leader behind the discovery and University of La Laguna researcher Sebastién Comerón said in a statement.
Related: What is dark matter?
Dark matter is effectively invisible because it does not interact with light like the everyday matter that composes stars, planets, and us. Its presence can be inferred by its gravitational interactions, however. The existence of this shadowy substance was first posited when astronomers observed massive galaxies rotating so fast they would fly apart if it weren't for the gravitational influence of some unseen mass holding them together.
This fact resulted in scientists theorizing that all large galaxies are wrapped in an envelope of dark matter, and this has become an important assumption in the development of theories of galactic evolution. But the discovery of a galaxy that appears to haven no dark matter challenges that assumption.
Examining an anti-social relic galaxy
Considered a cosmic relic, NGC 1277 is unusual among galaxies because it has had little interaction with other surrounding galaxies. Galaxies like this are considered to be the remains of giant galaxies that existed in the early universe. As such, these relic galaxies are essential in helping astronomers to understand how the first galaxies formed.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
To assist in this line of inquiry, Comerón and colleagues observed the relic galaxy NGC 1277 with an instrument called an integral field spectrograph. This allowed them to map the motion of the galaxy and determine its mass and how that mass is distributed.
This revealed that the distribution of NGC 1277's total mass — which should include dark matter — was the same as the distribution of the mass of its everyday matter contents, in other words, stars, dust, gas and planets. That means that within the galaxy's radius, there can't be a dark matter content any greater than 5%, but the findings are more consistent with a complete absence of dark matter in NGC 1277.
This is surprising, as the currently favored models of cosmic evolution including the standard model of cosmology, suggest NGC 1277 should be comprised of between 10% and 70% dark matter.
"This discrepancy between the observations and what we would expect is a puzzle, and maybe even a challenge for the standard model," team member and University of La Laguna researcher Ignacio Trujillo said.
Where did relic galaxy's dark matter go?
The scientists behind this revelation have a few ideas about why NGC 1277 is so deficient in dark matter.
"One is that the gravitational interaction with the surrounding medium within the galaxy cluster in which this galaxy is situated has stripped out the dark matter," team member and University of La Laguna researcher Anna Ferré-Mateu. "The other is that the dark matter was driven out of the system when the galaxy formed by the merging of protogalactic fragments, which gave rise to the relic galaxy."
The team isn't totally satisfied with either explanation and will, therefore, continue investigating NGC 1277 with the William Herschel Telescope (WHT) at the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory on the Canary Island of La Palma.
If these future investigations confirm this relic galaxy lacks the universe's most mysterious form of matter, the scientists think this won't challenge the existence of dark matter altogether. Conversely, the team believes it would challenge alternatives to dark matter models, so-called modified gravity theories.
"Although the dark matter in a specific galaxy can be lost, a modified law of gravity must be universal; it cannot have exceptions," said Trujillo. "So a galaxy without dark matter is a refutation of this type of alternative to dark matter."
Conclusive answers will have to wait, though, Comerón acknowledged. "The puzzle of how a massive galaxy can form without dark matter remains a puzzle," the scientist concluded.
The team's research is published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.
-
wildthing721 The Dark matter substance that noone has ever found goes missing in a galaxy that has no use for it. This confirms to scientists in favour of it, that is must exist everywhere. Either amazing science or we have slipped down the rabbit hole somewhat here.Reply -
jhixon Korean scientists make 1st discovery of dark state of electrons in solids for the first time in the world on 7/29/24 and it's naturally occurring. While a lattice doesn’t exist in space to prevent photons from emitting light, other celestial bodies with a stronger electromagnetic force will stop electrons from emitting photons, and not emitting light are dark electrons. Dark electrons are real, factual and are probably the dark clusters found at the outer edge of galaxies.Reply -
CatDad007
Do you have a link to share please?jhixon said:Korean scientists make 1st discovery of dark state of electrons in solids for the first time in the world on 7/29/24 and it's naturally occurring. While a lattice doesn’t exist in space to prevent photons from emitting light, other celestial bodies with a stronger electromagnetic force will stop electrons from emitting photons, and not emitting light are dark electrons. Dark electrons are real, factual and are probably the dark clusters found at the outer edge of galaxies. -
jhixon
https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2024/07/119_379576.html#:~:text=A%20group%20of%20Korean%20scientists%20has%20discovered%20the,Britain%20and%20Canada%2C%20the%20science%20ministry%20said%20Monday.CatDad007 said:Do you have a link to share please? -
Unclear Engineer As already discussed, this use of the term "dark" for these electrons has nothing to do with the "dark matter" in astronomy theories. Similarly, "dark oxygen" that seems to be generated by the metallic nodules on the bottom of the ocean at great depths has nothing to do with the "dark matter" in astronomy.Reply
Some people seem to be conflating completely unrelated phenomena because they don't understand what the underlying physics are for each.
And the commercial media seems to be encouraging that with the way they write their headlines.
Don't be conned by the clickbait, please. -
George²
Forgive me for going slightly off topic for an example of whether we should trust the corean scientists and some famous places on the internet for scientific publications. Remember the "superconductor" "at room temperature" called to the general public lk-99.jhixon said:Korean scientists make 1st discovery of dark state of electrons in solids for the first time in the world on 7/29/24 and it's naturally occurring. While a lattice doesn’t exist in space to prevent photons from emitting light, other celestial bodies with a stronger electromagnetic force will stop electrons from emitting photons, and not emitting light are dark electrons. Dark electrons are real, factual and are probably the dark clusters found at the outer edge of galaxies. -
jhixon Scientists believe that galaxies have invisible mass in the form of matter that doesn’t interact with light. The gravity holding these galaxies exists because of this invisible mass.Reply
For decades, this explanation has supported the existence of the hypothetical dark matter. However, a new study claims that gravity can exist even without mass, potentially eliminating the need for dark matter altogether.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/gravity-can-exist-without-mass-and-dark-matter-could-be-myth-says-study/ar-AA1s9zw3?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=ec6bcc8255e5494499ef5e5b388347b3&ei=21
Dark electrons exist in matter, and therefore exist in our universe. Dark electrons can also be locked or become unified entanglement by electromagnetism causing electrons to not give off photons, and this can occur from celestial bodies with more electromagnetism so this is realistic. Dark matter is just made up -
jhixon
Considering this had scientists from the United States, Korea, England and Canada, this was a joint venture.George² said:Forgive me for going slightly off topic for an example of whether we should trust the corean scientists and some famous places on the internet for scientific publications. Remember the "superconductor" "at room temperature" called to the general public lk-99. -
billslugg "It is somewhat similar to how photons, which themselves do not have mass, still experience gravity due to the presence of big astronomical entities."Reply
False statement. Photons have mass. In fact, all things with any amount of energy have some mass. But that is beside the point. All things follow the curvature of space just the same, regardless of how massive they are. (Gallieo 1592)
The paper invokes negative mass to allow the theory. I'll defer to "mass that can't be seen" ala "Dark Matter" over negative mass.