Gravitational waves could help us find out how fast the universe's expansion is accelerating

An artist's depiction of gravitational waves.
An artist's depiction of gravitational waves caused by a merger between two massive cosmic objects. (Image credit: R. Hurt/Caltech-JPL)

Gravitational waves emitted when distant black holes collide and merge, causing the very fabric of space-time to ring like a bell, could be used to help measure the rate at which the universe is expanding, a new study reports. 

Since the late 1990s, astronomers have known that not only is the universe expanding, but it is doing so at an accelerating rate. The cause of this so-called late-time acceleration has remained mysterious, earning itself the placeholder name "dark energy." 

And researchers have been puzzled by the fact that the two main ways to measure cosmic expansion give different values for the rate, which is called the Hubble constant. This discrepancy has remained, even as both methods have become more precise over the years.

Related: 'Hubble trouble' could deepen with new measurement of the universe's expansion

These two techniques are the "late-time" method, which considers the velocity of galaxies and their distance from us, and the "early time" method, which studies the "fossil light" from just after the Big Bang called the cosmic microwave background.

Late-time measurements currently give an expansion rate of roughly 73 ± 1 kilometers per second per megaparsec, while early-time measurements give a value of 67.5 ± 0.5 km/s per megaparsec. 

This has led scientists to search for a corroborating method for measuring the Hubble constant. And that's where the new study comes in.

Illustration showing gravitational waves from a black hole merger being lensed by a galaxy as they travel to Earth.

Illustration showing gravitational waves from a black hole merger being lensed by a galaxy as they travel to Earth. (Image credit: P. Ajith/ICTS)

Gravitational lensing and gravitational waves

The new study suggests the use of a phenomenon predicted by Albert Einstein and usually associated with the distortion of light called gravitational lensing to measure the Hubble constant.

Gravitational lensing is an effect that arises from Einstein's theory of general relativity. The great physicist's 1915 theory of gravity predicts that mass has a warping effect on space and time, united as a four-dimensional entity called space-time. 

This warping means that, when light from a background source passes an object of great mass like a galaxy, its path is bent by this "gravitational lens." This effect can result in the magnification of the background source, and it is used to great effect to see early galaxies by observatories like NASA's James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). 

Gravitational lensing is usually associated with light. But gravitational waves — ripples in space-time created by accelerating objects of enormous mass, such as two black holes spiraling toward each other — should be similarly affected. That means gravitational waves from these violent merger events should also display gravitational lensing, as light does.

Light can take different paths past a lensing object because the amount it is deflected depends on how close it comes to the gravitational lens. This means the light arrives at Earth at different times, and this time delay can result in the same object appearing in multiple places in a single image. As gravitational waves can also take varying paths past a gravitational lens, they should also display a similar arrival time delay, meaning that gravitational wave detectors could, in theory, detect gravitational waves from the same event at different times. 

This can be used as a measure of the Hubble constant, study team members said. That's because the rate of the universe's expansion influences the distance between sources of gravitational waves — black hole mergers, for example  — and the galaxy that is warping space-time and acting as the gravitational lensing and the distance to Earth.

The team said that the amount of gravitational-wave lensing should depend on the expansion rate of the universe and, thus, the Hubble constant. They suggest that a larger Hubble constant would result in a higher fraction of lensed black hole mergers and also smaller values of time delay compared to what would be seen in the case of a smaller Hubble constant.

Related: The gravitational wave background of the universe has been heard for the 1st time

You wait ages for a gravitational wave, and then two come along at once…

The advantage of measuring the expansion rate of the universe with gravitational waves rather than light is that these ripples are unaffected when they pass through massive gas and dust clouds, whereas light can be absorbed or have its frequency changed. This means the technique could allow astronomers to "see" further back into the history of the universe than is allowed by even strongly lensed light. 

Scientists haven't yet detected a strong gravitational lensing effect on gravitational waves from merging black holes, and the technique suggested by the team will depend on a catalog of thousands of gravitational wave events, which isn't available yet. The first gravitational waves were first detected just in 2015, so this is still a new area of science. Yet major developments are afoot.

The sensitivity of ground-based gravitational wave detectors has been improving with recent significant upgrades to the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), Virgo, and the Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector (KAGRA). Additionally, the first space-based gravitational wave detector, Europe's Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), is set to launch in 2037.

With these improved instruments, scientists could start to build a database that allows for the observation of gravitational lensing in gravitational waves. In this data, the team expects to find a small fraction of repeated signals from the same black hole merger events, just like the same distant light sources appear multiple times in JWST images due to gravitational lensing.

"A major scientific goal of future detectors is to deliver a comprehensive catalog of gravitational wave events, and this will be a completely novel use of the remarkable dataset," study co-author Tejaswi Venumadhav Nerella, a theoretical astrophysicist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, said in a statement.

The research was published on June 30 in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • Atlan0001
    Rod, this is mostly meant for you as I've read you:
    You've been saying for some time that the actual horizon, that I call the real-time horizon, is much farther out than 14-billion light years, the distance of the relative horizon. All the articles proliferating over the "time dilation" physicists think is a reality at that distance in light years, to me, proves you couldn't be more right in your realization!

    What is slowing down in going backward away in the observation is not the real territory of the universe but the universe in the light map of the universe! Professional physicists and astronomers, the vast majority of them apparently, obviously can't tell the difference between relativity and reality (observed -- observable -- relative time and unobserved -- unobservable -- real time)! They believe, obviously, that the two are one and the same thing and never to be divided into observable relativity and unobservable, but possibly calculable, reality!

    What I'm trying to say, Rod, and to anyone else, is that there is a vastly greater picture of distance beyond that "time dilation" one that that "time dilation" picture itself is pointing out and telling us exists even to the collapsed event Horizon. The whole "time dilation" picture, its whole way from there to here and back, means that the universe, our own universe, is vastly larger in its distances, and entities that occupy it, than light, at the dead slow constant of the speed of light, can ever show us.

    Without going back and looking up your recitation of calculations, I keep wanting to put the actual Horizon at the equivalent to 40-billion light years now that I know for sure (I am sure of it!) that the 14-billion light year Horizon is a false horizon.
    --------------------------

    The map is not the territory (the is not the )!
    Reply
  • rod
    Atlan0001 said:
    Rod, this is mostly meant for you as I've read you:
    You've been saying for some time that the actual horizon, that I call the real-time horizon, is much farther out than 14-billion light years, the distance of the relative horizon. All the articles proliferating over the "time dilation" physicists think is a reality at that distance in light years, to me, proves you couldn't be more right in your realization!

    What is slowing down in going backward away in the observation is not the real territory of the universe but the universe in the light map of the universe! Professional physicists and astronomers, the vast majority of them apparently, obviously can't tell the difference between relativity and reality (observed -- observable -- relative time and unobserved -- unobservable -- real time)! They believe, obviously, that the two are one and the same thing and never to be divided into observable relativity and unobservable, but possibly calculable, reality!

    What I'm trying to say, Rod, and to anyone else, is that there is a vastly greater picture of distance beyond that "time dilation" one that that "time dilation" picture itself is pointing out and telling us exists even to the collapsed event Horizon. The whole "time dilation" picture, its whole way from there to here and back, means that the universe, our own universe, is vastly larger in its distances, and entities that occupy it, than light, at the dead slow constant of the speed of light, can ever show us.

    Without going back and looking up your recitation of calculations, I keep wanting to put the actual Horizon at the equivalent to 40-billion light years now that I know for sure (I am sure of it!) that the 14-billion light year Horizon is a false horizon.
    --------------------------

    The map is not the territory (the is not the )!
    Atlan0001, the 40-billion light years distance is close to what you will get using cosmology calculators for the comoving radial distance when the CMBR redshift about 1100. The GR metric for expanding space used in the calculators' converting redshifts to distances, puts space way out there from Earth near 46 billion light years away (comoving radial distance for redshift near 1100). According to Special Relativity, telescopes on Earth because of light-time are limited to seeing objects about 13-13.8 billion light years away while their actual distances can be immensely farther away and not observable. However, I can see the Galilean moons moving around Jupiter :)
    Reply
  • rod
    I note the article reported, "Late-time measurements currently give an expansion rate of roughly 73 ± 1 kilometers per second per megaparsec, while early-time measurements give a value of 67.5 ± 0.5 km/s per megaparsec. This has led scientists to search for a corroborating method for measuring the Hubble constant. And that's where the new study comes in."

    I read this report at phys.org on this. Astrophysicists propose a new way of measuring cosmic expansion: lensed gravitational waves, https://phys.org/news/2023-06-astrophysicists-cosmic-expansion-lensed-gravitational.html
    My note. This phys.org report shows Hubble tension 67.4 km/s/Mpc to 76.5 km/s/Mpc for the range H0. The proposed lensed gravity waves solution is not yet determined and measured today. "We expect the first observation of lensed gravitational waves in the next few years," said study co-author Parameswaran Ajith. Additionally, these future detectors should be able to see farther into space and detect weaker signals."

    ref - Cosmography Using Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes, https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.261401, 30-June-2023.

    My note, this proposed method could see out to z ~ 10 for measuring the value of H0. I used Ned Wright cosmology calculator, https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/toolbox/calculators.html; the age of the Universe using H0 = 76.5 km/s/Mpc = 12.485 Gyr. Comoving radial distance = 28.653 Gly for z=10. H0 = 76.5 km/s/Mpc, space expands at 2.2417222E+00 c velocity or 2.24 x c velocity for z=10.0. Using H0 = 76.5 km/s/Mpc, space expands 2.479 x 10^-18 cm/s/cm. Consider how many cm/s space expands at 2.24 x c velocity :)
    Reply
  • Inquirer
    What is the benefit of all this research, have to deal with the improvement of life on this planet?

    "Research" has taken on a life of it's own!

    So much money is being spent on research, but I question the value received.

    How does all of this research help the homeless, the average underpaid worker, governments that aren't able to perform their appointed functions?

    Maybe it would be better to take care of business here on EARTH !!!

    Quit sending Star-link satellites into near orbit, so they don't interfere with with reasonable astronomy, weather recording links, and eventually become "space junk" that will burn up in our delicate atmosphere.

    Oh, and by the way, we're looking to ensure human "civilization" by colonizing the moon or Mars. It serves no useful purpose for those who will be left behind on an uninhabitable Earth.
    How can billions of people buy a ticket, and when does the next ship leave?
    A very few humans go, and the rest are LEFT TO DIE !!!

    To me, this process doesn't make any sense, but maybe I just don't understand why gravitational lenses , or why we need to know about the "expansion" of the "universe", and why those things are so important . I don't perceive that pursuing that kind of knowledge beneficial, other than to be published in scientific journals.

    I think that we are pointing much of efforts, and resources in the wrong direction!
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Inquirer, to answer your question, think about how the present human population of Earth is so very dependent on the technologies that humans have developed in the past. For instance, stone tools, metal tools, animal herding, agriculture and the discoveries of disease causes and medicines, etc. etc. etc. all came from people observing things, figuring out how they work and putting them to good use. That is why humans have reached 9 billion population. Hunter-gatherers could not exist in such large numbers. We depend on technology that comes from observations, experiments and development activities.

    But, humans have increased population as much or more than quality of life - overpopulation in many areas is the main cause of poor quality of life.

    We aren't going to solve the problems of poor quality of life for some of the population until we learn to stabilize our population at a comfortable level for everyone. Until then, we will simply keep increasing until wars, famines and plagues stop or reverse population increases.
    Reply
  • Atlan0001
    rod said:
    I note the article reported, "Late-time measurements currently give an expansion rate of roughly 73 ± 1 kilometers per second per megaparsec, while early-time measurements give a value of 67.5 ± 0.5 km/s per megaparsec. This has led scientists to search for a corroborating method for measuring the Hubble constant. And that's where the new study comes in."

    I read this report at phys.org on this. Astrophysicists propose a new way of measuring cosmic expansion: lensed gravitational waves, https://phys.org/news/2023-06-astrophysicists-cosmic-expansion-lensed-gravitational.html
    My note. This phys.org report shows Hubble tension 67.4 km/s/Mpc to 76.5 km/s/Mpc for the range H0. The proposed lensed gravity waves solution is not yet determined and measured today. "We expect the first observation of lensed gravitational waves in the next few years," said study co-author Parameswaran Ajith. Additionally, these future detectors should be able to see farther into space and detect weaker signals."

    ref - Cosmography Using Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes, https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.261401, 30-June-2023.

    My note, this proposed method could see out to z ~ 10 for measuring the value of H0. I used Ned Wright cosmology calculator, https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/toolbox/calculators.html; the age of the Universe using H0 = 76.5 km/s/Mpc = 12.485 Gyr. Comoving radial distance = 28.653 Gly for z=10. H0 = 76.5 km/s/Mpc, space expands at 2.2417222E+00 c velocity or 2.24 x c velocity for z=10.0. Using H0 = 76.5 km/s/Mpc, space expands 2.479 x 10^-18 cm/s/cm. Consider how many cm/s space expands at 2.24 x c velocity :)
    Thanks. Rod, for your map detail. I read it, Rod, and I absorb the 46-billion light year equivalence you project which I will use for the actual boundary Horizon beyond light's false 14-billion light year boundary. The rest seems to me to home into the "time dilation" map, the map which I do NOT merge with the territory into one and the same entity. To me you explain the map, not the territory, and you have reason to have all of your working interest -- well almost all -- tied up in the mapping of the "observed universe." Me, only a very small part of my interest is there. Still, thanks very much for taking the time and effort once more to go into the map of the universe.

    Expanding out:

    Two ways to look at it, gravitational "accelerative / decelerative universe" . . . and anti-gravitational "fractal zoom universe," essentially vertical multi-plane quantum entangled micro- and macro-cosmic hyper-surfaces (hyper-spaces). I don't think your thoughtful quantum theorists have a single problem with this potential possible Reality, but the "rigid" Relativist, absolutely. Having gone over to an infinity backed outside in force of gravity (no gravitational singularities), I now have not a single problem with anti-gravity and what it will refer to.

    So, as I see it and have said before, the only gravitational entity having anything to do with a black hole is its horizon. Inside of the gravitational strong binding force string-ring-horizon is the 0-point (portal) electroweak magnetic monopole (moment) singularity. The people who say the quantum gets torn to nothingness inside a black hole haven't a clue that it owns the black hole close in with spacetime wound around its point-singularity (which has one and only one Big Problem DEEP within, the Planck's Big Bang Horizon of infinity (the Big Bang's Planck Horizon of infinity)).

    Sort of reminds me a little bit of the far-out dreamer and the more down to Earth keeper of the books.
    Reply
  • Atlan0001
    Unclear Engineer said:
    Inquirer, to answer your question, think about how the present human population of Earth is so very dependent on the technologies that humans have developed in the past. For instance, stone tools, metal tools, animal herding, agriculture and the discoveries of disease causes and medicines, etc. etc. etc. all came from people observing things, figuring out how they work and putting them to good use. That is why humans have reached 9 billion population. Hunter-gatherers could not exist in such large numbers. We depend on technology that comes from observations, experiments and development activities.

    But, humans have increased population as much or more than quality of life - overpopulation in many areas is the main cause of poor quality of life.

    We aren't going to solve the problems of poor quality of life for some of the population until we learn to stabilize our population at a comfortable level for everyone. Until then, we will simply keep increasing until wars, famines and plagues stop or reverse population increases.
    There is no such thing as stabilizing the population, as China and Japan, among others have already discovered. Trying it, going for it, is a disaster in the making. There are only two ways to go, grow out into that frontier out there or die enclosure. Mind-expanding Space-Age Frontier and nova or mind contracting Dark Age Utopia and mass extinction. There is no third way. And by "nova," I mean Space Colonization (Personal Colonization (PCs) in local and wide area networks of manmade colony Arks), not Mars, not the Moon, not any ultra-limiting rock cave of the Solar System.

    Again, to paraphrase C. S. Lewis and follow Stephen Hawking's prophesy as well, "Aim for the heavens and get Earth thrown in. Aim for the Earth and get neither." Stephen Hawking very optimistically gives us 1,000 more years as a species if we do not go for the frontier immediately if not sooner. Inquirer needs to learn and think hard . . . is simply too ignorant of history and natural laws.
    Reply
  • rod
    ref - Cosmography Using Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes, https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.261401, 30-June-2023.

    The redshift in this report could be about 10. What happens to the angular size distance in BB expanding universe metric? 1 arcsecond maps to about 4.25 kpc diameter. Do we see objects that fit this angular size in BB cosmology for those redshifts about 10? It seems little or no reporting here on this distance (angular size) and scale used in GR metric to convert redshifts into distances from Earth.

    My point, IMO the comoving radial distances are not commonly reported to the public concerning BB cosmology distances used based upon redshifts (cosmological redshift answer), and the angular size scale is not commonly reported. The evolving universe looks good (e.g., tiny objects in the early universe slowly grow into big objects (spiral galaxies for example), add some more features not commonly reported, things may get interesting.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Atlan0001,

    If you read history, you will find a significant number of civilizations that crashed without any clear reason. The Mayans in Central America, and Great Zimbabwe in Africa are a couple of examples. Others clearly crashed because of conflicts with other competing civilizations.

    One theory about why civilizations crash has to do with overgrown complexity of the supporting processes and a lack of ability to sustain them by the population involved. Which is a scary concept for our current highly-connected world population. If we crash the systems that are sustaining us now, it won't matter that almost none of us still know how to chip arrowheads, because there will not be enough game to sustain the current population - most would die from lack of food and/or the conflicts to gain control of the remaining food supplies. Not a pretty picture at all.

    But, unfortunately, history and population dynamics studies seem to indicate that it is not an unlikely scenario. Human population can crash, as evidenced by past famines, and could do so on a global scale now that we are all so interdependent.

    Expanding into space with our current level of technology is not possible without support from a technologically proficient and functioning society on Earth. And even achieving light speed is not going to help move enough people off Earth fast enough to alleviate the overcrowding that is leading to conflicts and miseries. So, we really do need to learn to control our own reproduction rate, and we need to do it on a voluntary basis, not one forced by a totalitarian government.

    We, as a species, are smart enough to have learned how the ecosystems work and, to some degree, how climate works. But, a lot of that knowledge is rejected by the people who would need to change their behaviors in order to maintain those natural systems. We as a diverse population are used to being lied to by those of us who seek powers over us, and are skeptical of things we don't want to here. So, the real problem is how to get practically everybody to believe what we have learned and act appropriately to deal with it realistically in a coordinated manner to benefit all.

    Betting on light speed travel, or fusion power, to enable us to keep doing what we have always been doing is not a good bet, because those new abilities would still be insufficient to support an always expanding human population. There are limits to how much human population can be supported indefinitely on Earth, and we need to learn as a species to understand those limits and behave appropriately to stay within them. So far, humans have failed to do that globally at any level of technological achievement.
    Reply
  • Atlan0001
    According to Michelle de Crèvecoeur nee: Hector St; John circa 1772CE, among so many others such as Stephen Hawking, you have it precisely backwards, Unclear Engineer. It is the Frontier that expands the mass mind, the mass genius, not this earth (e), not this day. Going for it develops the means to go for it, not the other way around! And always has throughout history, proven by history. You go for it first (never mind the torpedoes!) -- you reach for it first ("damn the torpedoes!" -- David Farragut) -- and the means follow (The Portuguese (East, the 1400s) / Columbus (West, 1490s)) -- the grasp follows (the century and centuries of frontier development following the reach)! that is the natural law! You do not put the cart before the horse, but you do up the cart, go for the cart, and the horse comes!
    Reply