After a nail-biting descent and a tense silence from the lunar surface, the United States is back on the moon.
Odysseus, a robotic lander built by Houston-based company Intuitive Machines, touched down near the lunar south pole this evening (Feb. 22).
It was a landmark moment for space exploration: No private spacecraft had ever soft-landed on the moon before, and an American vehicle hadn't hit the gray dirt softly since NASA's crewed Apollo 17 lander did so in December 1972.
"What a triumph! Odysseus has taken the moon," NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said in a video message the agency aired just after confirmation of a successful touchdown. "This feat is a giant leap forward for all of humanity. Stay tuned!"
Related: Missions to the moon: Past, present and future
Returning to the moon
The moon was a frequent target for American spacecraft during the 1960s and early 1970s. This push didn't come from mere scientific curiosity: Landing astronauts on Earth's nearest neighbor was viewed as a national security imperative, a way to demonstrate technological superiority over the nation's Cold War rival, the Soviet Union.
The U.S. famously put 12 astronauts on the lunar surface over the course of six Apollo missions from 1969 to 1972. With the moon race thus definitively won, NASA was directed to focus on other goals for its human spaceflight program — chiefly, the development and operation of the space shuttle program.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
The U.S. launched a number of robotic moon probes after the Apollo era; NASA's sharp-eyed Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been circling the moon since 2009, for example. But, some frustrating fits and starts notwithstanding, getting back to the surface was not a priority — until recently.
In December 2017, then-President Donald Trump ordered NASA to return astronauts to the moon in the relatively near future. This directive gave rise to a broad and ambitious program called Artemis, which aims to establish a long-term, sustainable human presence on and around the moon by the end of the 2020s — and to use the knowledge gained in doing so to help get astronauts to Mars by the late 2030s or early 2040s.
NASA plans to set up one or more Artemis bases in the moon's southern polar region, which is thought to harbor lots of water ice. Before sending astronauts there, however, the agency wants to collect more data about this little-explored area — to help determine, for example, just how much water it contains and how easy this crucial resource is to access.
So NASA established another program called CLPS ("Commercial Lunar Payload Services"), which books rides for agency science instruments on robotic moon landers built by American companies.
"The goal here is for us to investigate the moon in preparation for Artemis, and really to do business differently for NASA," Sue Lederer, CLPS project scientist at Johnson Space Center in Houston, said during a press conference on Feb. 12. "One of our main goals is to make sure that we develop a lunar economy."
And that's where Intuitive Machines comes in.
Related: The 10 greatest images from NASA's Artemis 1 moon mission
Sending NASA science to the moon
In 2019, CLPS selected Intuitive Machines to deliver a batch of NASA science instruments to the lunar surface using the company's Nova-C lander, which is about the size of a British telephone booth.
After some modifications, the task order turned out to be worth $118 million, NASA officials said recently. It covered the transport of six agency experiments and technology demonstrations on Intuitive Machines' first lunar mission, which the company calls IM-1. That mission features a Nova-C vehicle named Odysseus, after the famous voyaging hero in Greek mythology.
The NASA instruments, which cost the agency an additional $11 million to develop, are designed to conduct a variety of investigations. For instance, one of them, called NDL ("Navigation Doppler Lidar for Precise Velocity and Range Sensing") used LIDAR (light detection and ranging) technology to collect data during descent and landing. NDL turned out to be vital to today's touchdown, as you'll see below.
Another instrument was designed to study how the spacecraft's engine exhaust interacts with lunar dirt and rock. Yet another will demonstrate autonomous positioning tech, which could eventually become part of a broad, GPS-like navigation system on and around the moon.
Intuitive Machines also put six commercial payloads on Odysseus for IM-1. One of them comes from Columbia Sportswear, which wanted to test its "Omni-Heat Infinity" insulative material in deep space. Another is a set of sculptures by the artist Jeff Koons, and there's even a "secure lunar repository" that aims to help preserve humanity's storehouse of accumulated knowledge.
Also flying on Odysseus was EagleCam, a camera system built by students at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. EagleCam was designed to deploy from Odysseus about 100 feet (30 meters) above the lunar surface and snap photos of the lander's epic touchdown from below. You can learn more about all 12 of the IM-1 payloads here.
Making history
Those 12 payloads lifted off on Feb. 15, when a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket sent Odysseus toward the moon. The lander's deep-space trek was short and relatively smooth, though things got a bit sporty toward the end.
Odysseus arrived in lunar orbit yesterday (Feb. 21) as planned. In the home stretch of its touchdown try today, however, the lander's handlers discovered that Odysseus' laser rangefinders, which allow it to determine its altitude and horizontal velocity, weren't working properly. So the team pressed NASA's experimental NDL payload into service for this vital function, pushing the landing try back by two hours to put the new plan into action.
This last-minute workaround — which required the team to design a software patch on the ground and beam it up to Odysseus — did the trick. At 6:11 p.m. EST (2311 GMT) today, Odysseus fired up its main engine for a crucial 11-minute burn that slowed the craft's descent toward the lunar surface. Then, at 6:23 p.m. EST (2353 GMT), Odysseus touched down softly near the rim of the crater Malapert A, about 190 miles (300 kilometers) from the lunar south pole.
Success wasn't immediately apparent, however. It took about 15 tense minutes for the IM-1 team to latch onto Odysseus' signal.
"What we can confirm without a doubt is, our equipment is on the surface of the moon and we are transmitting," mission director Tim Crain said after that milestone moment. "Odysseus has found his new home."
If all goes according to plan, the lander and its payloads will now operate for about seven Earth days on the lunar surface. IM-1 will end when the sun goes down at Malapert A, as Odysseus was not designed to survive the bitter cold of the long lunar night. (It takes the moon more than 27 Earth days to rotate once on its axis, so each lunar night lasts roughly two weeks.)
IM-1 is part of a newly energized march to the moon. For example, Pittsburgh company Astrobotic launched its Peregrine lunar lander last month on the first flight of United Launch Alliance's Vulcan Centaur rocket.
But Peregrine, which also carried NASA payloads via the CLPS program, suffered a crippling fuel leak just after deploying from the rocket's upper stage. The problem prevented Peregrine from making it to the moon, and Astrobotic ultimately steered it to a controlled demise in Earth's atmosphere on Jan. 18.
Two other private moon landers made it to lunar orbit recently — the Israeli Beresheet probe and Hakuto-R, which was built by Tokyo-based company ispace. Still, neither one could take the big next step; Beresheet crashed during its landing attempt in April 2019, and Hakuto-R suffered the same fate in April 2023.
National governments are increasingly shooting for the moon as well.
Last August, for instance, India put its robotic Chandrayaan-3 mission down near the lunar south pole. And just last month, Japan landed its own moon probe, called SLIM. It was the first such success for each nation; they've now joined the lunar party, which already included the Soviet Union, the U.S. and China.
And some of these countries have even bigger lunar ambitions.
There's the U.S. with its Artemis program, of course. But China also aims to put astronauts on the moon by 2030 and is working (with Russia and several other nations) to develop a lunar outpost later in that decade as well. India, meanwhile, has said it wants to put boots down on Earth's natural satellite in 2040 or thereabouts.
Some politicians have characterized this planned activity as a new moon race, a competition between the U.S. and China for the right to establish precedents and norms of behavior in the high frontier. Exploration advocates, however, tend to see the rosier side, stressing the coming exploitation of lunar resources that could help humanity extend its footprint out into the solar system for the first time.
Either way, the moon is coming into sharper focus for nations and businesses around the world. It's going to get busier and busier up there.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Michael Wall is a Senior Space Writer with Space.com and joined the team in 2010. He primarily covers exoplanets, spaceflight and military space, but has been known to dabble in the space art beat. His book about the search for alien life, "Out There," was published on Nov. 13, 2018. Before becoming a science writer, Michael worked as a herpetologist and wildlife biologist. He has a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the University of Sydney, Australia, a bachelor's degree from the University of Arizona, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. To find out what his latest project is, you can follow Michael on Twitter.
-
DrRaviSharma Why this is important mission is because it goes to Artemis 3 first human landing on moon after Apollo Program landings on which I worked.Reply
Only similar facility we had were lunar orbiters prior to Apollo and surveyor landers.
Ravi
(Dr. Ravi Sharma, Ph.D. USA)
NASA Apollo Achievement Award
ISRO Distinguished Service Awards
Former MTS NASA HQ MSEB Apollo
Former Scientific Secretary ISRO HQ
Ontolog Board of Trustees
Particle and Space Physics
Senior Enterprise Architect
SAE Fuel Cell Tech Committee voting member for 20 years.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/drravisharma -
Unclear Engineer Still waiting for an article updating the communications situation with the lander.Reply
Do we know yet if we will be able to see "Eagle Cam" video of the lander landing? -
skynr13 In the comment in this article, 'a new moon race, a competition between the U.S. and China for the right to establish precedents and norms of behavior in the high frontier. ' There is no competition going on here, as all precedents and norms of behavior will apply to everyone on the Moon. Inventing some rule or behavior doesn't put anyone above anyone else no matter what country they come from. Let's leave the idea of competition, out of going back to the Moon and make it a good reason to avoid War and making International friendships!Reply -
Sadot I want to know why they edited Bill Nelson's statement from "We've Taken then Moon" to "Odysseus has taken the Moon" ... I mean if I am honest it's no better.Reply
IF you were watching this thing live you heard what he originally said. They have edited all the videos... This makes me not trust anything that this teams says regarding this mission.. and yes I made this account just to point out how they are editing and changing their story. I wish Space dot come would call them out on this... or any media people.
That original statement was so bad... We would have flipped our lid if India or China or even Japan would have made any statements about taking the moon.... I mean what does that even men??
Did we take it back from the Romulans or something?? -
billslugg Editing is a valid issue. However, no matter what his statement, there is no cause for outrage. There are space treaties preventing any country from claiming a celestial body as their soil. As treaties, they got 2/3 of the Senate. Senate supermajority outranks head of NASA.Reply -
Sadot
True... but does it not worry you that with all the skepticism about the US and landing men on the moon... They go and pull this stunt. All these claims of its on its side... now its upright and so on?billslugg said:Editing is a valid issue. However, no matter what his statement, there is no cause for outrage. There are space treaties preventing any country from claiming a celestial body as their soil. As treaties, they got 2/3 of the Senate. Senate supermajority outranks head of NASA.
If its upright... then why did not other prelanding ops occur? Why did the deployable camera not separate?
Or did it? I don't know because they won't say.
Also as I pointed out in another post... if this thing landed upright after all. Why are they on the struggle bus when it comes to communications with the probe?
I mean it's upright... I can't be asked to believe they put a non-directional antenna on the thing know they are going into a massively hostile environment.
Things are not adding up.
They just pushed out the first picture purporting that it is a picture from the surface of the moon... I don't know man. I have major trust issues with NASA... and anything any American company claims about Space.
I guess if we get more pictures and data I will develop trust but now I have zero trust regarding this mission. -
Atlan0001 No ownership, no commerce, no profit, no opening, no breakout, no energy! Fifty-one years (a negative of maximum closed systemic 'Iron Curtain' bubble entropy)!Reply
"It ain't goin' nowhere," as a saying goes! One energetic private step forward, two "Circumlocution Office" bureaucratic entropic steps backward!" Growing, ever increasing, deficit of energy! "Fifty-one years!" "It ain't proceeding!" As Adam Smith would have said, "It isn't going to acquire momentum -- meaning a widening flood of frontage of humans and human activity beyond all iron(!) controls -- to opening, thus it builds an infinite untenable cost . . . and so do we, so does dynamic energetic civilization, inside an 'Iron Curtain' bubble of Earth!"
As always, the totalitarian devil will be in a growing regulatory avalanche of regulating details! The drag will be "extinction" quality.
As Admiral Grace Hopper once told us in a computer briefing, "the security features piled on this system make this system virtually useless!" -
skynr13
Yea, except I edit stuff out too, if I sent a lander all the way to the moon and forgot to flip the switch to turn it on!!!Sadot said:I want to know why they edited Bill Nelson's statement from "We've Taken then Moon" to "Odysseus has taken the Moon" ... I mean if I am honest it's no better.
IF you were watching this thing live you heard what he originally said. They have edited all the videos... This makes me not trust anything that this teams says regarding this mission.. and yes I made this account just to point out how they are editing and changing their story. I wish Space dot come would call them out on this... or any media people.
That original statement was so bad... We would have flipped our lid if India or China or even Japan would have made any statements about taking the moon.... I mean what does that even men??
Did we take it back from the Romulans or something?? -
billslugg
1) No, I am not worried about Moon hoax skepticism.Sadot said:True... but does it not worry you that with all the skepticism about the US and landing men on the moon... They go and pull this stunt. All these claims of its on its side... now its upright and so on?
If its upright... then why did not other prelanding ops occur? Why did the deployable camera not separate?
Or did it? I don't know because they won't say.
Also as I pointed out in another post... if this thing landed upright after all. Why are they on the struggle bus when it comes to communications with the probe?
I mean it's upright... I can't be asked to believe they put a non-directional antenna on the thing know they are going into a massively hostile environment.
Things are not adding up.
They just pushed out the first picture purporting that it is a picture from the surface of the moon... I don't know man. I have major trust issues with NASA... and anything any American company claims about Space.
I guess if we get more pictures and data I will develop trust but now I have zero trust regarding this mission.
2) They say deployable camera was turned off purposely during their reprogramming.
3) It is struggling because it is on its side and has only its omnidirectional antenna. The high gain dish antenna is out of service. Every spacecraft has an omnidirectional antenna, it is for emergency use when the dish is pointed wrong. They can't move the high gain dish on this lander, only by rotating the lander just before touchdown. Once down it is fixed.
4) All of this information is available in the news feeds. I would recommend reading them. This will help you in your addition.