James Webb Space Telescope spies earliest complex organic molecules in the universe
The chemicals reside within a galaxy that formed when the universe was about 10% of its current age.
Astronomers have detected the oldest known examples of complex organic molecules in the universe, a new study reports.
These chemicals — much like ones found in smoke and soot on Earth — reside within an early galaxy that formed when the universe was about 10% of its current age, according to the study.
The carbon-based molecules, technically known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, are found in oil and coal deposits on Earth, as well as in smog.
"The molecules we found aren't simple things like water or carbon dioxide," study lead author Justin Spilker, an astronomer at Texas A&M University in College Station, told Space.com. "We're talking about big, floppy molecules with dozens or hundreds of atoms in them."
Related: Our expanding universe: Age, history and other facts
These complex organic molecules are common in space, where they are often linked to tiny dust grains. Astronomers investigate them because they can help reveal key details of activity within galaxies — for instance, they help influence the rate at which interstellar gas cools. However, detecting these molecules in very distant galaxies that formed when the universe was relatively young has been challenging, because telescopes were limited in their sensitivity and the number of wavelengths of light they monitored.
Now, using NASA's extraordinarily powerful new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Spilker and his colleagues have detected these molecules in a galaxy known as SPT0418-47 more than 12 billion light-years from Earth.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
"It's remarkable that the universe can make really large, complex molecules very quickly after the Big Bang," Spilker said.
Given the extreme distance of SPT0418-47, the light the astronomers detected began its journey less than 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang. (The universe is currently about 13.8 billion years old.)
"This pushes back the old record for detections like this by about an extra billion years," Spilker said.
The discovery was made with the help of a warp in the fabric of space-time known as a gravitational lens. Albert Einstein discovered that mass distorts space-time, a bit like how a bowling ball might stretch a rubber sheet it was resting on. The greater the mass of an object, the more space-time curves around the item, and so the stronger the object's gravitational pull is. The way in which gravity behaves means that it can bend light like a lens, so a powerful gravitational field, such as that produced by a massive cluster of galaxies, can act like a giant magnifying glass.
Astronomers detected the previous record-holder for the oldest complex organic molecules using more than a full-day's worth of observations by NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope, Spilker said. In comparison, using JWST, "we only stared at this galaxy for a grand total of one hour," he said. "Webb really makes looking for organic molecules look too easy."
Related: 12 amazing James Webb Space Telescope discoveries
In addition, whereas previous efforts to detect complex organic molecules in ancient galaxies could only tell if the chemicals were there or not, "Webb's resolution lets us see actual details of where within a galaxy the molecules are located instead of just whether or not they are there at all," Spilker said. In SPT0418-47, the presence of these molecules is not uniform across the galaxy, the reason for which remains to be explained.
All in all, these new findings suggest that "it's possible for galaxies to form in overdrive," Spilker said. "The galaxy we studied is already just as massive, and its stars have formed just as much carbon and oxygen, as our own Milky Way, even though it's only a tenth the age. It's like a third grader who's already lived an entire career — gone to college, accomplished a career's worth of work, and then retired at age eight. The new results from Webb imply that it's not actually very difficult for galaxies to produce really complex molecules through all this rich chemistry going on in space."
In addition, scientists had previously thought these complex organic molecules were linked with star formation. However, the new data revealed this might not always prove true — Spilker and his colleagues found lots of regions with these molecules but no star formation, and others with new stars forming but none of these molecules, he said.
"Finding these big, complex molecules in galaxies when the universe was very young is one of those things that a lot of astronomers were hoping and expecting Webb to do, and I hope that the lessons we learned from this first attempt can help all of us as we move forward," Spilker said. "I'm eager to push to even more distant, younger galaxies — can we eventually find one that just hasn't had enough time for molecules this big to form? I'd also like to understand a lot better why these molecules exist in some regions of galaxies but not others. What was special about the regions with the molecules that allowed large molecules to form rapidly?"
Spilker cautioned that the JWST mid-infrared instrument (MIRI) used to make the new findings "appears to have declining performance right now. NASA has a team of very good engineers who are currently investigating the cause of the problem. But if the performance continues to deteriorate, it may make studies like this one impossible after the next year."
The scientists detailed their findings online today (June 5) in the journal Nature.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Charles Q. Choi is a contributing writer for Space.com and Live Science. He covers all things human origins and astronomy as well as physics, animals and general science topics. Charles has a Master of Arts degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia, School of Journalism and a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of South Florida. Charles has visited every continent on Earth, drinking rancid yak butter tea in Lhasa, snorkeling with sea lions in the Galapagos and even climbing an iceberg in Antarctica. Visit him at http://www.sciwriter.us
-
rod The space.com report says, "The molecules we found aren't simple things like water or carbon dioxide," study lead author Justin Spilker, an astronomer at Texas A&M University in College Station, told Space.com. "We're talking about big, floppy molecules with dozens or hundreds of atoms in them."...All in all, these new findings suggest that "it's possible for galaxies to form in overdrive," Spilker said. "The galaxy we studied is already just as massive, and its stars have formed just as much carbon and oxygen, as our own Milky Way, even though it's only a tenth the age."Reply
My note, this report from Feb-2023 shows the redshift for SPT0418-47, z=4.225. Discovery of a Dusty, Chemically Mature Companion to a z 4 Starburst Galaxy in JWST ERS Data, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..36P/abstract “We report the discovery of two companion sources to a strongly lensed galaxy SPT0418-47 ("ring") at redshift 4.225, targeted by the JWST Early Release Science program.”
The light time or look back distance using cosmology calculators 12.262 Gyr, age of universe at z=4.225, 1.459 Gyr, and comoving radial distance for SPT0418-47 where it is assumed to be today, 24.380 Gly. Using H0 = 69 km/s/Mpc, space is assumed to be expanding 1.7204144E+00 or at least 1.72 x c velocity. Given the chemical enrichment reported for SPT0418-47, where is the zero-metal gas BB cosmology uses to explain the origin of early galaxies and Population III stars or the gas of the cosmic dark ages? -
murgatroyd
That would be my question, too. Perhaps one of the telescopes planned for deployment in coming years will be able to look back even further?rod said:Given the chemical enrichment reported for SPT0418-47, where is the zero-metal gas BB cosmology uses to explain the origin of early galaxies and Population III stars or the gas of the cosmic dark ages? -
billslugg The metal poor gasses disappeared earlier than current models predict. Metal poor gasses may coalesce faster or metal poor stars burn out faster than models predict.Reply -
rod FYI, to be clear on my part, I am not looking at metal poor gas but zero-metal gas reports for the early universe model used in BB cosmology. There are reports on low metal or metal poor gas. Here is an interesting article from yesterday.Reply
https://phys.org/news/2023-06-early-universe-crackled-star-formation.html
"Another element of the JADES program involves the search for the earliest galaxies that existed when the universe was less than 400 million years old. By studying these galaxies, astronomers can explore how star formation in the early years after the Big Bang was different from what is seen in current times."
Using cosmology calculators like https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/toolbox/calculators.html or https://www.kempner.net/cosmic.php, I get z values ranging about 11-12 or larger for objects in the BB model where the age of the Universe <= 400 Myr. JWST has imaged some already, I am not aware of zero-metal gas reports. -
billslugg As I understand it, there was no "zero metal gas". The earliest hydrogen had small amounts of helium and lithium. Lithium is certainly a metal, I don't know if helium is defined as one.Reply -
rod
Good point. I see metal-free gas used in various papers on NASA ADS system or pristine gas that describes H, He, and perhaps a bit of Li that is postulated to form Population III stars. The reports I see indicate that there is always some more metal found like N, C, or Fe, or whatever but not the pristine gas or metal-free term as I read in some of the papers. Example, JWST/NIRSpec Measurements of Extremely Low Metallicities in High Equivalent Width Lyman-α Emitters, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08511billslugg said:As I understand it, there was no "zero metal gas". The earliest hydrogen had small amounts of helium and lithium. Lithium is certainly a metal, I don't know if helium is defined as one. -
billslugg The papers say the earliest galaxies have a Lyman Alpha line "effective width" greater than 240 nm. This indicates "metal poor".Reply
I can't find a definition of "effective width" anywhere. I can find that the pure hydrogen alpha line at 121.567 is only .1 nm wide and is a doublet with a 30% dip in the center. This due to spin orbit interaction.
I can find that the broadening of an emission line can be caused by scattering.
I'm basically stuck. -
rod
Yes, I have trouble in this topic too :) I note this about metalicity reported for z=9.79, the solar value 0.6 is found and wiki shows 0.0134 for this metal value for the Sun, so more metal here :)billslugg said:The papers say the earliest galaxies have a Lyman Alpha line "effective width" greater than 240 nm. This indicates "metal poor".
I can't find a definition of "effective width" anywhere. I can find that the pure hydrogen alpha line at 121.567 is only .1 nm wide and is a doublet with a 30% dip in the center. This due to spin orbit interaction.
I can find that the broadening of an emission line can be caused by scattering.
I'm basically stuck.
Astrophysicists confirm the faintest galaxy ever seen in the early universe, https://phys.org/news/2023-06-astrophysicists-faintest-galaxy-early-universe.html
ref - The nature of an ultra-faint galaxy in the cosmic dark ages seen with JWST, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05994-w, 17-May-2023.
"...low stellar mass (10^7.19 M⊙) and subsolar (≈0.6 Z⊙) gas-phase metallicity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallicity
At least for z=9.79, some metals seen in the gas, not pristine gas.