'Einstein ring' snapped by James Webb Space Telescope is most distant gravitationally lensed object ever seen

In the field of one of JWST's largest-area surveys, COSMOS-Web, an Einstein ring was discovered around a compact, distant galaxy. It turns out to be the most distant gravitational lens ever discovered by a few billion light-years.
In the field of one of JWST's largest-area surveys, COSMOS-Web, an Einstein ring was discovered around a compact, distant galaxy. It turns out to be the most distant gravitational lens ever discovered by a few billion light-years. (Image credit: P. van Dokkum et al., Nature Astronomy accepted, 2023)

Photos snapped by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have revealed the farthest-ever example of an "Einstein ring." The record-breaking halo of warped light, which is a whopping 21 billion light-years away, is unusually perfect and surrounds a mysteriously dense galaxy.

An Einstein ring is an extremely rare type of gravitationally lensed object that was first predicted by Albert Einstein's theory of relativity. Gravitational lensing occurs when the immense gravity of a massive foreground object, such as a galaxy cluster or a black hole, warps space-time around itself; light emitted by more distant objects, such as galaxies or supernovas, that passes through this warped space-time also appears curved and warped from our perspective on Earth.

This effect also magnifies the light of the object being lensed, similar to how a magnifying glass works, allowing astronomers to study distant objects in greater detail than is normally possible. Most gravitationally lensed objects form arcs or partial rings that surround the foreground object. But a true Einstein ring forms a complete circle around the closer entity, which is possible only when the distant object, foreground object and observer are perfectly aligned.

In a new study uploaded Sept. 14 to the preprint server arXiv and accepted for publication in the journal Nature Astronomy, researchers discovered the new eerily circular Einstein ring, named JWST-ER1, within the COSMOS-Web survey, a detailed map of more than 500,000 galaxies captured during a 200-hour continuous JWST observation.

A collection of incomplete and near-perfect Einstein rings photographed by NASA's Hubble telescope. In order to get a perfect circle, the background object, foreground object and observer must be perfectly aligned. (Image credit: NASA)

JWST-ER1 has two parts: JWST-ER1g, the compact galaxy that acts as the lensing object in the foreground; and JWST-ER1r, the light from a more distant galaxy that forms the luminous ring. JWST-ER1g is located around 17 billion light-years from Earth, while JWST-ER1r is another 4 billion light-years farther away. Until now, the farthest detected lensing object was around 14.7 billion light-years away, according to BigThink.com. (While the age of the universe itself is estimated to be about 13.7 billion years, the universe's constant expansion means that light from the oldest objects must travel much farther than this to reach our telescopes).

Related: 'Dark universe' telescope Euclid faces some setbacks during commissioning

Thanks to the complete ring of JWST-ER1, researchers calculated the mass of the lensing galaxy by seeing how much it had warped space-time around itself. This revealed that the galaxy has a mass equivalent to around 650 billion suns, which makes it unusually dense for its size. Some of this extra mass can be explained by dark matter, the mysterious, invisible matter that makes up around 85% of all matter in the universe. But even then, it is unlikely that there are enough stars to account for the rest of the galaxy's heft based on the researchers' calculations.

"Additional mass is needed to explain the lensing results," but it is not exactly clear what this mass is, the researchers wrote in the paper.

The complete Einstein ring, JWST-ER1, is the most distant gravitationally-lensed object ever discovered. (Image credit: NASA/James Webb Space Telescope/van Dokkum et al.)

Other, similarly old and equally dense galaxies have been detected before, which suggests there is something common about these ancient star factories that makes them so massive. One explanation is that these galaxies harbor much more dark matter than expected, while another theory suggests that they may have more small-mass stars lurking within them than younger galaxies do. But more work is needed to find out.

This is not the first true Einstein ring spotted by JWST. In September 2022, a Reddit user discovered a perfectly circular ring of light from the galaxy JO418, located around 12 billion light-years from Earth, lensed around a closer galaxy.

JWST has also utilized gravitational lensing to snap the most distant star ever detected and one of the universe's oldest galaxies.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Harry Baker
Live Science Staff Writer

Harry is a U.K.-based staff writer at Live Science. He studied Marine Biology at the University of Exeter (Penryn campus) and after graduating started his own blog site "Marine Madness," which he continues to run with other ocean enthusiasts. He is also interested in evolution, climate change, robots, space exploration, environmental conservation and anything that's been fossilized. When not at work he can be found watching sci-fi films, playing old Pokemon games or running (probably slower than he'd like). 

  • rod
    "Photos snapped by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have revealed the farthest-ever example of an "Einstein ring." The record-breaking halo of warped light, which is a whopping 21 billion light-years away, is unusually perfect and surrounds a mysteriously dense galaxy."

    My note. The 21 Gly distance from Earth, likely needs some clarification. Using Ned Wright calculator and z=2.0, the light time distance is 10.405 Gly, the comoving radial distance is nearly 17.199 Gly distance. Space way out there must be expanding faster than c velocity too :) https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/toolbox/calculators.html
    Reply
  • Helio
    Admin said:
    The James Webb Space Telescope has snapped a stunning image of a perfectly formed Einstein ring, which is also the most distant gravitationally lensed object ever detected.

    'Einstein ring' snapped by James Webb Space Telescope is most distant gravitationally lensed object ever seen : Read more
    What is the z value at 21 Glyrs? Using Ned Wright's calculator, I only get a z = 3 for the comoving radial distance. Am I doing this wrong? Calling Rod. :)

    I see you posted while I was typing.
    Reply
  • rod
    Helio said:
    What is the z value at 21 Glyrs? Using Ned Wright's calculator, I only get a z = 3 for the comoving radial distance. Am I doing this wrong? Calling Rod. :)

    I see you posted while I was typing.
    Yes, *doing this wrong* :) I get using z=3.0 which is the default that my browser brings up, "The comoving radial distance, which goes into Hubble's law, is 6481.7 Mpc or 21.141 Gly." so 21.141 billion light years and the shorter distance, light time is "The light travel time was 11.550 Gyr."

    I had some discussion with Sky & Telescope recently on this, most just refer to the light-time distance or look back distance. Discussing comoving radial distances in cosmology can confuse some and starts to bring up things like space expanding faster than c velocity too.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Is the observation length equal to the object's distance to ring? If we moved 10% closer to the ring, would we see the same image as now? Or would the image be at a different distance? Does the ring have a mirror like quality? Angle in....angle out?

    Or can you process the depth behind the ring with DSP? Sorta like selecting depth you wish to see, by "un-rolling" it from the ring?

    Are we looking at a focal point?...or are we looking at a focal line?
    Reply
  • rod
    https://www.kempner.net/cosmic.php
    Another calculator I use. The default for H0 = 67.04 km/s/Mpc compared to a bit faster for Ned Wright.
    Reply
  • Helio
    rod said:
    Yes, *doing this wrong* :) I get using z=3.0 which is the default that my browser brings up,
    Perhaps it retains the last user's entry, which may have been my entry of 3. It was not 3 when I went there.

    rod said:
    "The comoving radial distance, which goes into Hubble's law, is 6481.7 Mpc or 21.141 Gly." so 21.141 billion light years and the shorter distance, light time is "The light travel time was 11.550 Gyr."
    So what is the actual redshift value we should have here? I would expect something greater than 12 to be the most distant object. Is there 21Glyr figure not too small?
    rod said:
    I had some discussion with Sky & Telescope recently on this, most just refer to the light-time distance or look back distance. Discussing comoving radial distances in cosmology can confuse some and starts to bring up things like space expanding faster than c velocity too.
    IMO, distance is important and should be expressed in an actual estimated distance -- as if you borrowed my magic wand, froze the universe into a static universe, then stepped off the distance. The other "distances" may have utility, but not for the public, like me.
    Reply
  • Helio
    rod said:
    https://www.kempner.net/cosmic.php
    Another calculator I use. The default for H0 = 67.04 km/s/Mpc compared to a bit faster for Ned Wright.
    Ok, but Ned's allows whatever Ho you want.
    Reply
  • rod
    Classical Motion said:
    Is the observation length equal to the object's distance to ring? If we moved 10% closer to the ring, would we see the same image as now? Or would the image be at a different distance? Does the ring have a mirror like quality? Angle in....angle out?

    Or can you process the depth behind the ring with DSP? Sorta like selecting depth you wish to see, by "un-rolling" it from the ring?
    "Is the observation length equal to the object's distance to ring?"

    My understanding is that the diameter used is determined based upon the distance used from Earth. Similar for other targets like M1 Crab nebula and its size using the distance. However, converting the cosmological distances using the redshift metric established for GR based upon FLRW, can get dicey when the angular size distance starts being looked at, the 1 arcsecond to kpc size seen in those calculators. As redshifts get larger, some object diameters can get dicey for the distances used based upon redshifts. Some discussed briefly this issue in BB on the forums, but I see very little on the topic.
    Reply
  • rod
    Helio said:
    Ok, but Ned's allows whatever Ho you want.
    Helio, keep in mind there are a number of cosmology calculators out now. H0 and z are inputs that can be changed along with some other parameters. They are based upon GR metric for expanding space using the famous FLRW math. The distances presented are based upon input values like H0 or z that can change quite a bit.
    Reply
  • Helio
    rod said:
    Helio, keep in mind there are a number of cosmology calculators out now. H0 and z are inputs that can be changed along with some other parameters. They are based upon GR metric for expanding space using the famous FLRW math. The distances presented are based upon input values like H0 or z that can change quite a bit.
    Right, and I assume most calculators treat those parameters as variables that the user can change. Do you find their results vary any if the same parameter values are used?
    Reply