Can the James Webb Space Telescope see galaxies over the universe's horizon?

News
By
published

How can any telescope see a galaxy 33.8 billion light-years away in a universe that is only 13.8 billion years old?

Red, blue, and white specks of various sizes on a black background. In a black sqaure one of these dots is magnified to a red and blue line
The galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 which exists 33.8 billion light-years from Earth. (Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Brant Robertson (UC Santa Cruz), Ben Johnson (CfA), Sandro Tacchella (Cambridge), Phill Cargile (CfA))

Since it began sending data back to Earth in 2022, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has greatly impacted astronomy, and one of its most revolutionary achievements is the observation of some of the most distant galaxies ever seen. However, because light doesn't travel instantly — but rather moves at about 300 million meters (985 million feet) per second in a vacuum — we don't see those galaxies as they are today, but as they were billions of years ago. 

Moreover, our universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years old. So, we should assume that the most distant galaxy we could ever hope to see is no more than 13.8 billion light-years away. (One light-years is the distance light travels in a year). That point should be a "cosmological horizon" of sorts — beyond which no telescope should be able to see. And, because nothing can travel through space faster than c, that means there should be no way a galaxy further than 13.8 billion light years away, and getting more distant all the time could affect Earth. Right? 

Wrong. If only the universe were that simple.

The redshifted spectrum of JADES-GS-z14-0 as measured by the JWST's NIRSpec instrument (Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, J. Olmsted (STScI). Science: S. Carniani (Scuola Normale Superiore), JADES Collaboration.)

"A cosmological horizon is a maximum distance from which one could possibly retrieve information," Jake Helton, a University of Arizona astronomer who is also part of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) team, told Space.com.

"There are a few different cosmological horizons," Helton continued, "which have different definitions and depend on various cosmological quantities. The most relevant here is the cosmological horizon which is the maximum distance from which light could have traveled to us in the age of the universe. This defines
the edge of the observable cosmos."

Related: James Webb Space Telescope spots the most distant galaxy ever seen (image)

In March of 2024, JADES scientists revealed the powerful telescope had spotted JADES-GS-z14-0, the most distant and early galaxy humanity has ever seen. The paradox, however, is that JADES-GS-z14-0 is located about 33.8 billion light years away. 

How can we see light from an object so distant the universe isn't old enough to have allowed it to have reached us? Doesn't JADES-GS-z14-0's position 33.8 billion light-years away mean we see it as it was 33.8 billion years ago, something that would surely challenge the estimation of the age of the universe?

Not so. Again, this is evidence that the universe has a way of turning sensible and logical conclusions on their heads. 

"How can a distant galaxy like JADES-GS-z14-0 ever be observed, since it is more than 13.8 billion light years away from us and its light seemingly would have taken more time than the age of the universe to reach us?" Helton asked rhetorically. "The answer is the expansion of the universe."

Seeing a galaxy older than time itself

If the universe would just sit still, then light from a galaxy 33.8 billion light-years away would take 33.8 billion years to reach us, and that would be that. But, in the early 1900s, Edwin Hubble found that distant galaxies appeared to be receding away from each other, and the further apart they were, the faster they were going. In other words, the universe isn't static; it is expanding.

This was further complicated in 1998, as the 20th century drew to a close when two separate teams of astronomers observed that, not only is the universe expanding, but that expansion is also accelerating. The force responsible is a mystery, but it has been given the placeholder name of "dark energy."

A diagram showing the expansion of the the universe at first due to the Big Bang and then at an acceleration rate when dark energy took over. (Image credit: NASA / WMAP Science Team)

There are two major and distinct periods of expansion over the 13.8 billion-year history of the universe. The first is an initial period of rapid cosmic inflation that is now commonly called the "Big Bang." 

This inflationary epoch saw the volume of the cosmos increase by a factor of 10^26 (10 followed by 25 zeroes). That is equivalent to your fingernail going from growing at 1 nanometer per second to suddenly growing 10.6 light-years (62 trillion miles) long. At this time, the universe was dominated by energy, and this period is known as the energy-dominated epoch.

This was followed by a matter-dominated epoch beginning 47,000 years after the Big Bang. Eventually, universal expansion allowed the cosmos to cool enough to allow protons to form from quarks and gluons, and then protons to bond with electrons to form the first atoms of hydrogen, which formed the first stars and galaxies. During this period, the Big-Bang-driven expansion of the universe slowed to a near halt.

The matter-dominated epoch came to a surprising end when the universe was just under 10 billion years old. At this time, the universe suddenly began to expand rapidly yet again. Plus, that expansion got faster and faster and even continues to accelerate today. This third significant period of the universe is called the dark-energy-dominated epoch. It's the epoch we're currently in.

An illustration of the cosmic horizon, the most distant point ibn the universe we can see with any telescope (Image credit: Pablo Carlos Budassi (CC-by-SA 3.0))

Thanks to these periods of expansion of the universe, the light from JADES-GS-z14-0 has only actually been traveling to the JWST and Earth for 13.5 billion years, despite its source now being much more distant than 13.5 billion light-years away. That means the JWST sees JADES-GS-z14-0 as it was 300 million years after the Big Bang. Without the expansion of the universe, JADES-GS-z14-0 would still be around 13.5 billion light-years away, though it would have still experienced smaller local motions that could have moved it closer together or further from nearby galaxies. But such galactic movement would've been nowhere near the kind caused by the expansion of the universe.

According to Helton, the cosmological horizon, or the "Photon Horizon," is a sphere with a boundary around 46.1 billion light years away, a figure dictated by the universe's expansion. This is the actual horizon beyond which we shouldn't be able to "see" a galaxy. The galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 is indeed within that horizon.

To avoid confusion, astronomers actually use two distance measurement scales: a co-moving distance that eliminates the expansion of the universe as a factor and a proper distance that includes it. That means the co-moving distance of JADES-GS-z14-0 is 13.5 billion light-years, while its proper distance is 33.8 billion light-years.

JADES-GS-z14-0 and other distant and ancient galaxies won't always be visible, though.

A diagram showing the journey of light from an early galaxy to the JWST (Image credit: Robert Lea (created with Canva))

A lucky era to have the James Webb Space Telescope

The fact that the JWST can see JADES-GS-z14-0 means it was once "causally connected" to Earth and our local universe. In other words, it was possible for a signal from JADES-GS-z14-0 to reach us in the Milky Way, thus a "cause" in this galaxy that existed at the dawn of time could have an "effect" in our galaxy in this modern epoch of the cosmos.

"Any observable galaxy must be within the particle horizon and must have been causally connected with us at some point in the history of the universe," Helton said.

This isn't the case anymore, however. Galaxies like JADES-GS-z14-0 and the other JADES-discovered galaxies are now so distant and are driven away from us so rapidly, thanks to dark energy, that no signal from them sent today could ever reach us. That's because the photon horizon moves away from us at the speed of light, but for really distant objects, the space between the Milky Way and those galaxies is expanding faster than the speed of light.

This might seem implausible, as Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity sets the speed of light as a universal speed limit. However, that is a rule for objects with mass moving through space, not a rule for the very fabric of space itself.

RELATED STORIES:

—  James Webb Space Telescope spies record-breaking 'failed star' that shouldn't exist (video)

—  Volunteers spot almost 100 cold brown dwarfs near our sun

 — 'Failed star' is the coldest radio wave source ever discovered

In around 2 trillion years after Earth and humanity are long gone, the expansion of the universe means that, whatever intelligent species replaces us in the Milky Way (if one ever does), will be unable to see any galaxies that exist beyond our local group — which has a diameter of around 10 million light-years. 

It is a sobering thought, and it means humanity lives at a unique point in the history of the universe at which the most distant galaxies are still within our view. We are capable of knowing more about the universe and its origins than any intelligent life that may follow us. Astronomers, including Helton, intend to use the JWST to fully exploit this cosmic privilege.

"Working with JWST and the JADES Collaboration has been incredible," Helton said. "Writing papers about science with JWST, like my recent one on
JADES-GS-z14-0, has been the most rewarding and exciting experience
of my research career."

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

4 Comments Comment from the forums
  • George²
    There is a better explanation. All of the Big Bang and related hypotheses are wrong. In fact, apparently no other hypothesis about the universe is true either. After they deviate so much from the observed and from... common sense.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    I don't think energy made mass, I think mass made energy.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Light comes from mass. Gravity comes from mass. Light is a constant velocity acceleration of area and volume. Light is an acceleration. Gravity is an acceleration.

    Energy is an acceleration. A change or transfer of motion.

    All energy comes from mass.

    All acceleration comes from mass. SPACE does not come from mass. Space has no acceleration. Mass does not come from space. Mass does not come from energy, energy is an excretion of mass.

    We claim to understand the accelerations of light and gravity, without a clue to what mass is.

    And use space to do it.

    What's the matter?

    "We don't know what a tomato is, but we can describe a variety of it." DM.
    Reply
  • Helio
    It can be confusing to many what the BBT is, especially if Inflation theory is forced into it, though it is an elegant model to solve two important issues.

    BBT was born from Lemaitre's Primeval Atom theory. Lemaitre's published a teaser in 1925, followed by a full GR paper in 1927 that was the first GR solution that fit observations. Contrary to all other models, Lemaitre's model explained the universe as an expanding one, whereas Einstein, de Sitter and others were stuck on the premise that the universe was static, never really changing.

    Lemaitre's model assumed the universe to have begun at an unknown size, but he didn't care too much for guessing this since the bulk of his modeling explained the universe from today to such a tiny point. Indeed, there are no observations of the universe when it was tiny for reasons predicted by his model. Namely, the universe would have been comprised of elementary particles in a sea of photons and these particles, especially electrons.

    The "Bang" moniker came in 1949 from a rival theorists, Frey Hoyle on a radio show.

    Inflation was not introduced until 1979 by Alan Guth.

    No doubt many scientists are comfortable with adding Inflation theory to the BBT, but a caveat now and then is warranted.

    It is also customary to give Hubble credit for discovering that "distant galaxies appeared to be receding away from each other, and the further apart they were, the faster they were going. In other words, the universe isn't static; it is expanding."

    Hubble made it clear that galactic velocities were "apparent velocities". In de Sitter's GR model, he predicted such things, though their motions would be through space, not of space carrying those galaxies away from one another. Hubble never accepted the expansion model, though in his last years in retirement he suggested it could be the case.

    The first to discover that the "apparent velocities" were a result of the expansion of space, of course, was Lemaitre (1927). His paper calculated the first linear expansion rate for the universe in this paper. Hubble's more robust work was not till 1929. He held tightly to the credit afforded him and Mt. Wilson for their work.
    Reply