SPACE.com Columnist Leonard David

How can we protect humans on Mars from dangerous solar storm radiation?

a sunset seen from a dusty reddish-orange valley
NASA's Ingenuity helicopter captured this photo of the sun setting on Mars on Feb. 22, 2023, during its 45th Red Planet flight. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

The weather on Mars is not a welcoming factor for future expeditions. Yes, it's a harsh, chilly, foreboding planet. The place is no paradise. To make matters worse on Mars, astronauts will be more exposed to space radiation than stay-at-home Earthlings. Why so?

Mars lacks a protective magnetosphere and is cocooned in thin air that is roughly one-percent of the thickness of Earth's atmosphere. This ambiance of nastiness lets in high-energy radiation, such as protons, ions, neutrons and gamma rays. The sun does its part by churning out intense bursts of radiation called solar energetic particles, or SEPs.

Researchers at NASA and at NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center in Boulder, Colorado are working on strategies for round-trip Mars expeditions to deal with sun-spitting solar storms

Storm warnings 

Not only are there worries about Earth-to-Mars transiting crews, but also about what crews on the surface of the Red Planet will need to have in their tool kit to deal with an incoming storm — especially given the delay in receiving word from mission control teams back on Earth.

"Due to communication delays between Earth and Mars, astronauts must be equipped to independently assess local space weather conditions at Mars," said Gina DiBraccio, acting director of the Planetary Science Division at NASA Headquarters.

"Scientists are currently utilizing available observations and models to develop tools that will play a role in providing advanced warning of any space weather threats directed at Mars," DiBraccio told Space.com. 

Artist's illustration of a crewed outpost on Mars. (Image credit: NASA)

Arrival time

Thinking about Mars radiation issues and future human sojourns to the planet got to a heightened awareness level from an event in May 2024. 

A strong solar flare flung X-rays and gamma rays at Mars, with a follow-on coronal mass ejection hurling charged particles at the distant world, arriving at the Red Planet in just tens of minutes, NASA reported.

Keeping an eye on the event were analysts at the Moon to Mars (M2M) Space Weather Analysis Office located within the Heliophysics Science Division at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. They provide real-time space weather assessments in support of NASA human and robotic missions.

For on-the-spot, encounters at Mars with the sun's output, NASA's MAVEN — the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution spacecraft — was the only asset that was able to observe the sun's activity and the response of the thin Martian atmosphere at the same time.

NASA's Curiosity Mars rover captured evidence of a solar storm's charged particles arriving at the Martian surface in this three-frame video taken by one of the rover's navigation cameras on May 20, 2024, the 4,190th Martian day, or sol, of the mission. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

ESCAPADE twosome

But there's good news on the Mars horizon. 

Later this year, MAVEN is to be joined by two spacecraft destined for Mars orbit. Rocket Lab has built the Escape and Plasma Acceleration and Dynamics Explorers. That's a mouthful shortened to ESCAPADE, a mission run by the University of California Berkeley's Space Science Laboratory and NASA. 

This ESCAPADE duo — to be sent to Mars via the maiden takeoff of Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket — will crank out vital science from the Red Planet, expanding the heliophysics fleet capable of monitoring the impacts at Mars from incoming radiation.

 The soon to be launched Escape and Plasma Acceleration and Dynamics Explorers (ESCAPADE) will add to our ability to monitor the impacts of incoming energetic particle events at Mars.  (Image credit: Rocket Lab)

Disquieting occasion

The recent punch of radiation on Mars' surface was the largest surge recorded by a Radiation Assessment Detector, or RAD. That device is mounted on NASA's Curiosity Mars rover that plopped down on the planet 12 years earlier.

Additionally, spontaneous SEPs emitted from the sun during solar storms, can dominate the Martian surface radiation field on short time scales of hours to days.

Don Hassler is the principal investigator of RAD at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder. The radiation environment on the surface of Mars, he explains, consists mainly of Galactic Cosmic Radiation and their secondary particles generated by interactions in the atmosphere or soil. 

Additionally, spontaneous SEPs emitted from the Sun during solar storms, can dominate the Martian surface radiation field on short time scales of hours to days.

"Protecting future human astronauts from exposure to this radiation remains one of the major challenges for the exploration of Mars," Hassler and his RAD research colleagues advised during a space weather workshop held last April in Boulder.

Observational gaps

In terms of real-time prediction and modeling about space weather at the Red Planet, there are data gulfs. Those information fissures are largely caused by observational gaps that drive the models, said James Favors, NASA Space Weather Director. 

"For example, we have no observations from Sun-Mars Lagrange Point 1, or from the far side of the sun from Earth — as well as a lack of tailored models to accurately predict solar inputs into the unique Mars environment," Favors told Space.com.

Favors points to needed work ahead on creating an Earth-independent space weather capability.

"The challenge from a space weather perspective at Mars is in part a communication infrastructure limitation," said Favors. 

"At most points during the Martian year," Favors points out, "it would simply take too long to transmit the necessary data at Mars back to Earth, run the models, and send back the model outputs to a crew at Mars in time for them to take appropriate action."

Favors said that, in terms of future human missions to Mars, one scenario envisioned is that the needed observational and modeling capabilities would be part of the crew vehicle architecture. 

"This way the process of creating an actionable space weather prediction could occur fully independent of Earth," Favors said.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Leonard David
Space Insider Columnist

Leonard David is an award-winning space journalist who has been reporting on space activities for more than 50 years. Currently writing as Space.com's Space Insider Columnist among his other projects, Leonard has authored numerous books on space exploration, Mars missions and more, with his latest being "Moon Rush: The New Space Race" published in 2019 by National Geographic. He also wrote "Mars: Our Future on the Red Planet" released in 2016 by National Geographic. Leonard  has served as a correspondent for SpaceNews, Scientific American and Aerospace America for the AIAA. He has received many awards, including the first Ordway Award for Sustained Excellence in Spaceflight History in 2015 at the AAS Wernher von Braun Memorial Symposium. You can find out Leonard's latest project at his website and on Twitter.

  • Coinneach
    You do wonder if settlers on Mars are going to spend a lot of time hiding from radiation.

    Won't it also affect crops?

    Maybe the farm chambers will have radiation proof shutters which can be quickly closed, but I can't think of what they'd be made of.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    Solar storms are only part of the problem. Galactic cosmic rays are far more powerful and are not stopped by heavy nuclei very well, they just bounce their way on through. It takes about 50 feet of rock to equal the protection given by our atmosphere, which is equivalent to 40 feet of water. Water is comprised of light nuclei which are more effective at stopping high energy particles.

    No amount of any protective material that one could carry about with them, even at lesser gravity, will protect against cosmic rays. All you can do is to make sure you are spending most of your time underground and you monitor your total dose from being outdoors. Also consider the trip to Mars. There is no way to shield a spacecraft with protection in the form of mass. Only a magnetic field might help.
    Reply
  • Coinneach
    Thanks for your reply

    I had read that water and polythene are the least bad materials for radiation protection. Something to do with the bound hydrogen.

    Could a Martian colony be protected by an artificial, local magnetic field; or would that require phenomenal amounts of energy?

    Sorry if that's a daft question. I'm out of my depth here.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    The lighter the nuclei, the more it recoils when hit by a massive particle. This is how energy is removed from the big particle. Hydrogen is best at slowing them down.

    Using fields to protect has an inherent problem in that no energy is removed from the cosmic ray, the ray is simply deflected sideways. Someone else is going to get it. No arrangement of magnetic fields could protect a given volume from particles arriving from all directions. At each pole, the particles would simply spiral around the magnetic field lines and land at the poles unabated. This is not an option for cosmic rays.
    Reply
  • Coinneach
    Cheers!

    In my next life I will study more physics.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    FWIW, we are talking about radiation from particles that have mass, such as electrons ("beta rays"), protons, helium nuclei ("alpha particles") and neutrons, which mainly transfer energy by giving it to whole atoms with "collisions. That is completely true for neutrons, because they have no net electric charge, so those are collisions with atomic nuclei. But for those other particles that do have a charge, they will interact with the electrons bound to atoms, kicking them off and "ionizing" the atoms. So, charged particles have a specific distance they can travel in specific materials, depending on the mass of the radiation particle and the density of electrons in the material. For instance, the low energy electrons (beta particles) released by Tritium (double- heavy hydrogen) are so low energy that they don't even penetrate human skin. But cosmic ray electrons have so much energy that they can go much deeper. And he more massive cosmic ray particles will even act like the CERN "atom smasher" and break apart the nuclei of atoms that they hit, making a splatter of all sorts of other particles.

    On the other hand, very high energy photons (e.g., x-rays and gamma rays) that do not have "rest mass" interact (almost) exclusively with the electrons in shielding atoms, and it a probabilistic way, So, they don't have a specific finite range in shielding, but get absorbed by a fraction of what is remaining per unit distance in the shielding. So, heavy material like lead does provide the best shielding for photon type radiation.

    When a solar flare occurs, the photon radiation gets to us without any significant warning time, because those photons travel at the same speed as the photons of visible light that our eyes can see and the radio waves that any instruments near the Sun can send us. But, the particle type radiation is much slower, taking days instead of minutes to get to us from the Sun. So, there is warning time for the particle radiation

    How to use that info to best shield astronauts in-transit is what NASA is looking for ideas about.
    Reply
  • Coinneach
    You see these artists impressions of proposed early Mars settlements which look like a string of portacabins. It sounds as if anyone trying to live in these will soon end up looking like something out of a Ready Brek advert. ("Do you want your kids to glow in the dark?!")

    Reality seems more likely to be a lead-lined underground bunker; except that there won't be any lead.

    All in all, space travel clearly won't suit anyone who suffers from claustrophobia.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    The best way around the whole problem is to have sleeping/cooking/working quarters underground. No easily constructed surface habitat is going to be able to support the needed shielding on its roof. There needs to be an overburden of 40 feet of water, 53 feet of solid rock or 100 feet of loose soil, by my estimates.
    Reply
  • Pogo
    If they pick the right location to land, there should be plenty of water, just need sufficient energy to melt it. Maybe live in one of those lava tubes they’ve seen, build a big water tank overhead. Voila! Shielding. I’m sure it’s easier said than done.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    No matter where we go we need to learn to bore holes.
    Reply