Rock that punched hole in New Jersey house confirmed to be 4.6 billion-year-old meteorite
'It was clear it was not an Earth rock.'
A metallic-looking rock that smashed through the roof of a residential home in New Jersey's Hopewell Township earlier this week is indeed a meteorite — a rare one about 4.6 billion years old, scientists confirmed on Thursday (May 11).
"It was obvious right away from looking at it that it was a meteorite in a class called stony chondrite," Nathan Magee, chair of the physics department at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), whose office was contacted by the Hopewell Township police soon after the rock was found on Monday (May 8), told Space.com.
Chondrites are primitive rocks that make up 85% of meteorites found on Earth. Most chondrites found to date have been discovered in Antarctica; only rarely does one crash in populated areas.
Related: What are meteorites?
The New Jersey rock, which is about 6 inches long by 4 inches wide (15 by 10 centimeters), is a notable exception. It slammed into the Hopewell Township house, dented the floorboard, punched two holes in the ceiling and was still warm when it was discovered by Suzy Kop in her father's bedroom around noon on Monday.
"I'm looking up on the ceiling and there's these two holes, and I'm like, 'What in the world has happened here?'" Kop told 6 ABC's Trish Hartman.
Once emergency responders cleared Kop, her family and their home of any harmful radioactive residues, Kop handed over the space rock to the nearby college for further inspection.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
At TCNJ, Magee's team consulted Jerry Delaney, a retired meteorite expert who had worked on the meteorite collection at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. The team confirmed the space rock to be about 4.56 billion years old, which means it has been around since the beginning of our solar system and represents the leftover fragments from its creation.
The 2.2-pound (0.9 kilograms) meteorite, which will likely be named Titusville, NJ — the postal address closest to its landing site — is "in excellent condition, and one of a very small number of similar witnessed chondrite falls known to science," Magee said in a statement on Thursday.
The top layer of the meteorite has a blackened crust a few millimeters thick from partially burning up in Earth's atmosphere. Using a hand lens designed to look at rocks closely, his team found that the meteroite's minerals are blue and gray in color, with a small amount of other metals mixed in, Magee told Space.com.
Rock, rock ... who's there?🪨 TCNJ physics professor Nate Magee confirmed today that the object that recently crashed landed into a home not far from campus is, indeed, from outer space. Read more from the @AP: https://t.co/e2zbpQyEfk@tcnjscience #tcnj #tcnjiseverywhere pic.twitter.com/FMXH5YtEeUMay 11, 2023
The team studied the rock's texture and composition by placing it inside a large chamber of a scanning electron microscope. Based on initial estimates, the meteorite is a chondrite of class LL-6, which has less iron than other members of its family and is at least 30 to 40% denser than the most common rocks on Earth, like slate or granite.
"So it was clear it was not an Earth rock," Magee told Space.com.
Even before the space rock had breached Earth's atmosphere, it was exposed to a lot of heat in outer space that had heavily altered its structure and composition, so much so that it is difficult to easily distinguish individual grains or chondrules that make up the meteorite, scientists shared in Thursday's update.
Follow Sharmila Kuthunur on Twitter @skuthunur. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Sharmila Kuthunur is a Seattle-based science journalist covering astronomy, astrophysics and space exploration. Follow her on X @skuthunur.
-
TruthB Told I wonder if Farmer's would cover this one? Dum Dum Dumdy Dum Dum We Are FARMER'S !!Reply -
davidbsimmons I can accept the statement, "it was clear that this was not an Earth rock", from the scientific analysis of its composition. But how can scientists "{confirm] the space rock to be about 4.56 billion years old"? There is no mention of how they "confirmed" it. From the information given, the statement sounds far fetched and speculative, not scientific.Reply -
TruthB Told
They probably checked the shipping label on the bottom for the tracing # (which would give them the time sent & location of the sender).davidbsimmons said:I can accept the statement, "it was clear that this was not an Earth rock", from the scientific analysis of its composition. But how can scientists "{confirm] the space rock to be about 4.56 billion years old"? There is no mention of how they "confirmed" it. From the information given, the statement sounds far fetched and speculative, not scientific. -
billslugg They date the meteorites by looking at varios ratios of isotopes of gasses contained within. Different isotopes decay at different rates. They can tell when the atoms were created in a supernova event. They had to then condense into dust and form rocks. The rock itself is younger than the dated age.Reply -
rod Post #3 is correct. "There is no mention of how they "confirmed" it."Reply
I did not see how the 4.6 Gyr age was measured, nothing specific. Specific report like Uranium, Rubidium, Potassium-Argon, etc, and if different ages were found too. The cosmic ray exposure age(s) I did not find reported either. -
rod
billslugg, do you have the reference paper showing this and *repeated many times* dating? I would like to read that and see the isochron fits too, thanks.billslugg said:They used Argon-40/Argon-39, plus a couple of uranium. Repeated many times. -
rod billslugg, do you have the reference paper showing this and *repeated many times* dating? I would like to read that and see the isochron fits too, thanks.Reply -
billslugg
I am sorry, I was remembering a list I was looking at but it may have been a different meteorite. Now, I cannot find any details on this one. Perhaps they are simply going by guesswork since all ordinary chondrites were formed at about the same time. Maybe why they say: "approximately".rod said:billslugg, do you have the reference paper showing this and *repeated many times* dating? I would like to read that and see the isochron fits too, thanks. -
bolide I suspect they determined the age from seeing what kind of meteorite it is, and knowing that all meteorites of that type were formed at around the time that the solar system itself formed.Reply
Now how they know that is a longer story.