Airplane contrails are a tricky, and surprising, contributor to global warming

up the center in a vast blue sky two white lines of smoke trail a small airlpaine near the top of the image.
(Image credit: Mike Kemp/In Pictures via Getty Images)

Commercial airplanes have made strides in reducing their carbon emissions, but the exhaust clouds trailing behind them can still have long-term impacts on the environment, a new study suggests. 

Researchers from Imperial College London found that condensation trails, or contrails, created by aircraft exhaust fumes trap heat in the atmosphere. As a result, these thin cloud streaks have a greater impact on global warming than that of carbon emissions from combustion of jet fuel, according to the study. 

"This study throws a spanner in the works for the aviation industry. Newer aircraft are flying higher and higher in the atmosphere to increase fuel efficiency and reduce carbon emissions," Edward Gryspeerdt, lead author of the study, said in a statement. "The unintended consequence of this is that these aircraft flying over the North Atlantic are now creating more, longer-lived, contrails, trapping additional heat in the atmosphere and increasing the climate impact of aviation." 

Modern commercial aircraft are designed to fly at altitudes above 38,000 feet (about 12 kilometers), where the air is thinner and there is less aerodynamic drag in order to reduce jet fuel consumption (which creates less carbon emissions). Meanwhile, private jets fly more than 40,000 feet (12.2 km) above Earth, where there is less air traffic. This is higher than older commercial aircraft, which usually fly at altitudes around 35,000 feet (11 km). 

Related: Human-caused global warming at all-time high, new report concludes

Using machine learning to analyze satellite data on more than 64,000 contrails from a range of aircraft flying over the North Atlantic, the researchers found that modern aircraft, both commercial and private, create more contrails than older aircraft and that these contrails take longer to dissipate, which influences current estimates of climate warming. 

"This doesn't mean that more efficient aircraft are a bad thing — far from it, as they have lower carbon emissions per passenger-mile," Gryspeerdt said in the statement. "However, our finding reflects the challenges the aviation industry faces when reducing its climate impact."  

The study offers insights to lessen the impact of contrails by reducing the amount of soot emitted from aircraft engines, which is produced when fuel burns inefficiently. This, in turn, would cut down on the lifetime of contrails and the subsequent warming effect. 

"From other studies, we know that the number of soot particles in aircraft exhaust plays a key role in the properties of newly formed contrails. We suspected that this would also affect how long contrails live for," Marc Stettler, co-author of the study, said in the statement. "Our study provides the first evidence that emitting fewer soot particles results in contrails that fall out of the sky faster compared to contrails formed on more numerous soot particles from older, dirtier engines."

Their findings were published Aug. 7 in the journal Environmental Research Letters. 

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Samantha Mathewson
Contributing Writer

Samantha Mathewson joined Space.com as an intern in the summer of 2016. She received a B.A. in Journalism and Environmental Science at the University of New Haven, in Connecticut. Previously, her work has been published in Nature World News. When not writing or reading about science, Samantha enjoys traveling to new places and taking photos! You can follow her on Twitter @Sam_Ashley13. 

  • COLGeek
    Not surprising at all. Post 9/11, when aircraft were grounded/severely limited, there were noticeable/measurable changes tracked then.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    It would have been nice if the article had described how contrails increase temperatures on the surface.

    There seem to be a lot of competing effects, but clouds have generally been described as causing cooling on the surface by reflecting incoming solar radiation (sunlight) back into space without changing its wavelengths. Of course, they can also capture heat radiated from the earth's surface towards space and reradiate it back to the surface. We generally think of cloudy days as cooler than average and cloudy nights as warmer than average for those reasons.

    Also, particulates in the stratosphere have been proposed to decrease global warming, but usually something like sulfuric acid, not carbon particles.

    And, CO2 in the upper atmosphere has been modeled to decrease upper atmospheric temperatures, mostly due to CO2 migration there from the air below, not from jet contrails.

    So, this article does not really do anything to explain how the net effect of contrails warms the planet's surface air. But, it needs to provide some explanation to attain credibility. With all of the doom-and-gloom biases in science reporting in the media these days, it needs to seem to make scientific sense to the lay person to have any effect on thinking in the general population.

    And, including a "global warming" video that does not even mention the phenomena discussed in the article just makes it seem more likely to be propaganda than new scientific discovery.

    If you want credibility, don't preach - do explain.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    “As a result, these thin cloud streaks have a greater impact on global warming than that of carbon emissions from combustion of jet fuel, according to the study.”

    That’s quite a statement. How low do we need to fly so that only the combustion carbon emitted goes to global warming?

    What’s the combustion/contrail ratio at 20,000 ft? Where’s the least of both?

    Pilots will need faster response times for in flight control problems. Less drop time.
    Reply