Boeing's Starliner spacecraft still doesn't have a landing date, NASA says

A white space capsule seen through a window in space, above Earth.
Boeing's Starliner space capsule docked at the International Space Station. (Image credit: ESA)

NASA says Boeing Starliner will extend its first astronaut mission well into the summer after launching June 5 for what was supposed to be a 10-day flight.

Starliner experienced both helium leaks and thruster issues during a June 6 docking with the International Space Station (ISS). The spacecraft is stable and rated to leave the ISS in case of emergency, Boeing and NASA leadership stress. But after testing the thrusters in space, NASA and Boeing said they want to take more time to understand the root cause.

A test campaign will start as soon as July 2 at the White Sands Test Facility in New Mexico to replicate how the thrusters were used during the flight, NASA commercial crew program manager Steve Stich said during a livestreamed update today (June 28) with reporters. The testing will take approximately two weeks, but that depends on what is found — and more analysis will be required afterwards. As such, NASA and Boeing do not yet have a landing date for Starliner.

"We're not going to target a specific date until we get that testing completed, and we look at the fault tree, and then we understand the path for it," Stich said.

Related: Thruster glitches and helium leaks can't stop Boeing's Starliner astronaut test flight — but why are they happening?

Starliner's 10-day Crew Flight Test mission with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, both former U.S. Navy test pilots, is a developmental mission that had flexibility built into it in case of the unexpected in space.

The unexpected happened on June 6 during docking, as an ongoing tiny helium leak and five misbehaving thrusters affected Starliner's final approach to the ISS. NASA waved off the first attempt at docking to make sure Starliner was ready to go, but authorized the second attempt, which brought the spacecraft to dock at the orbiting complex.

Extra testing and review of the helium supply and five thrusters (out of 28 in the reaction control system) revealed the leak had stabilized and that most of the thrusters were recovering. NASA and Boeing have decided, however, not to use at least one of those thrusters during landing due to performance concerns. 

Prior to today's teleconference, the last major update from Starliner officials came on June 21, which suggested the landing would be sometime after July 2. Analysis continues today, the teleconference participants noted, and even more testing may be required on the spacecraft depending on what is found at White Sands.

"After it's all complete, we'll meet and we'll make sure we did everything we needed to do to understand the system, then we'll come home safely," said Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager of Boeing's commercial crew program. Nappi emphasized the timing of what happens next cannot be said yet. "These tests are unpredictable [as to] how long they take and and how successful they'll be."

Related: Will Boeing Starliner issues delay its 1st long-duration astronaut flight? It’s too soon to tell.

Boeing Starliner docked to the International Space Station during Crew Flight Test in June 2024. (Image credit: NASA)

While analysis continues on the ground, Wilmore and Williams pivoted their time into other ISS duties, such as maintenance. "They know this is a test flight, and they knew that we would learn, and this is all good. It's all not unexpected," Nappi said of the crew's comments in recent communications with Boeing from orbit.

Starliner is a new spacecraft type from Boeing, as opposed to the other commercial crew supplier that ferries astronauts to the ISS: SpaceX's Crew Dragon, which is based on the Cargo Dragon design. Starliner took two uncrewed missions to get ready for CFT, after the first effort failed to reach the ISS in 2019 due to computer glitches. 

Dragon, meanwhile, had a single uncrewed mission in 2019 and a single astronaut flight test in 2020 before starting operational ISS crewed missions every six months.

Following the COVID-19 pandemic and dozens of fixes, Starliner's second uncrewed test flight safely reached the ISS in 2022 after also experiencing thruster issues during docking. One reason CFT has been docked for extra time is to evaluate the service module in which most of the fuel is located, as that will be discarded during landing. That testing may determine more about why Starliner's thruster system had issues during the 2022 and 2024 dockings.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Elizabeth Howell
Staff Writer, Spaceflight

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 covering diversity, education and gaming as well. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time. Elizabeth's reporting includes multiple exclusives with the White House and Office of the Vice-President of the United States, an exclusive conversation with aspiring space tourist (and NSYNC bassist) Lance Bass, speaking several times with the International Space Station, witnessing five human spaceflight launches on two continents, flying parabolic, working inside a spacesuit, and participating in a simulated Mars mission. Her latest book, "Why Am I Taller?", is co-written with astronaut Dave Williams. Elizabeth holds a Ph.D. and M.Sc. in Space Studies from the University of North Dakota, a Bachelor of Journalism from Canada's Carleton University and a Bachelor of History from Canada's Athabasca University. Elizabeth is also a post-secondary instructor in communications and science at several institutions since 2015; her experience includes developing and teaching an astronomy course at Canada's Algonquin College (with Indigenous content as well) to more than 1,000 students since 2020. Elizabeth first got interested in space after watching the movie Apollo 13 in 1996, and still wants to be an astronaut someday. Mastodon: https://qoto.org/@howellspace

  • DrRaviSharma
    Suni and Butch will be safe and we wish them so.
    We understand that these tests are more on the Service Module that will be jettisoned and not available but Command Module will be used as planned for return journey and has at least once been flown for surface landing in flat areas.
    Helium leak, leak-stabilization, duration of Helium use and why we could not test it on ground are questions being addressed during these tests.
    Best wishes.
    Ravi
    (Dr. Ravi Sharma, Ph.D. USA)
    NASA Apollo Achievement Award
    ISRO Distinguished Service Awards
    Former MTS NASA HQ MSEB Apollo
    Former Scientific Secretary ISRO HQ
    Ontolog Board of Trustees
    Particle and Space Physics
    Senior Enterprise Architect

    SAE Fuel Cell Tech Committee voting member for 20 years.

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/drravisharma
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    The whole test program seems rational - up until the point where Stich says

    "These tests are unpredictable how long they take and and how successful they'll be."

    but then Nappi assures us

    "After it's all complete, we'll meet and we'll make sure we did everything we needed to do to understand the system, then we'll come home safely."

    That seems to imply coming home in Starliner, especially in the context of what is said in the rest of the article. But, I hope they are not ruling out getting the crew down "safely" in a Dragon capsule, if these tests that are "unpredictable" about "how successful they'll be" don't provide a strong assurance of safety to return in the Starliner capsule.
    Reply
  • DrRaviSharma
    Apparently the Questions and tests are for the Service Module of future Starliners as Service Module will be jettisoned and lost hence they want to test everything including leakages etc. Apparently there is minimum impact on safety or performance of Command Module.
    Often they do not explain minute details or such clarity that we do not get confused.
    I am assuming that most thrusters are functional even with minor leaks on the SAFE Command Module that will land on west coast desert area.

    Ravi
    (Dr. Ravi Sharma, Ph.D. USA)
    NASA Apollo Achievement Award
    ISRO Distinguished Service Awards
    Former MTS NASA HQ MSEB Apollo
    Former Scientific Secretary ISRO HQ
    Ontolog Board of Trustees
    Particle and Space Physics
    Senior Enterprise Architect
    SAE Fuel Cell Tech Committee voting member for 20 years.
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/drravisharma
    Reply
  • JDB
    Admin said:
    Boeing Starliner's spacecraft for the Crew Flight Test mission has been undergoing testing after issues during docking on June 6. Listen at 2 p.m. EDT (1800 GMT) as NASA and Boeing say what they plan on doing next.

    Listen live today as NASA, Boeing discuss Starliner return, spacewalk issues : Read more
    The number of faults with this is simply horrendous. I do not believe they should use it for the astronauts return journey. There is too much at risk. Use Space X and then remote the Starliner home empty, adjusting for weight etc. If it makes it all well and good , if not ......Nuff said!
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    The thrusters on the Service Module are important for the reentry.

    From the first flight, which had multiple problems:
    "Two software errors detected during the test, one of which prevented a planned docking with the International Space Station, could each have led to the destruction of the spacecraft, had they not been caught and corrected in time, NASA said on February 7, 2020. A joint NASA–Boeing investigation team found that "the two critical software defects were not detected ahead of flight despite multiple safeguards", according to an agency statement. "Ground intervention prevented the loss of the vehicle in both cases". Before re-entry, engineers discovered the second critical software error that affected the thruster firings needed to safely jettison the Starliner's service module. The service module software error "incorrectly translated" the jettison thruster firing sequence." (from Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Starliner )

    During the second flight, there were similar problems with valves before launch and then:
    "Two Orbital Maneuvering and Attitude Control System (OMACS) thrusters failed during the orbital insertion burn, but the spacecraft was able to compensate using the remaining OMACS thrusters with the addition of the Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters. A couple of RCS thrusters used to maneuver Starliner also failed during docking due to low chamber pressure."

    So, the problems seen in this third flight are problems that have occurred before, and Boeing has not succeeded in resolving them for several years, already. They are trying to understand what is happening in space by firing the thrusters on the Starliner at White Sands, now. At this point "NASA announced that while the Starliner is capable of returning the astronauts to Earth in the event of an emergency on the ISS, the capsule is not approved to fly until its thruster issues are solved or at least better understood.
    The Service Module is required to perform adequately to achieve safe reentry. it must provide the change in velocity and control the attitude of the capsule during that change in velocity. I was not able to find a drawing or description of where the various thrusters are located on the combined craft nor which ones are malfunctioning. But, given the current and previous thruster problems, it is not unreasonable to fear additional failures during sustained additional uses - especially when they are still testing to "better understand" the cause(s?) of the failures already experienced.
    Reply
  • DrRaviSharma
    Unclear Engineer
    I was not aware that CM has no capability for re-entry. I assumed that SM is not needed. If it is needed and thrusters need to work on SM where they have issues then it is a serious safety issue with Suni and Butch.
    Very serious testing so how do we interpret assurance from NASA manager?
    Regards
    Reply