NASA cancels $450 million VIPER moon rover due to budget concerns

a four-wheeled robot in a cleanroom under UV lights
NASA's VIPER – short for the Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover – sits assembled inside the cleanroom at the agency's Johnson Space Center. (Image credit: NASA)

NASA has cancelled its VIPER moon rover program due to rising costs. 

VIPER, short for Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover, was a robotic mission intended to land near the moon's south pole and spend 100 days scouting for lunar ice deposits. The rover was slated to launch in 2025 to the moon aboard an Astrobotic Griffin lander as part of NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services initiative (CLPS). Now, it appears VIPER will be scrapped for parts or potentially sold to industry. 

The decision to axe the VIPER mission was announced today (July 17) in a teleconference; cancelling the program is expected to save the agency an additional $84 million in development costs. NASA has spent about $450 million on the program so far, not including launch costs.

Despite the cancellation, NASA leadership stressed that the program was successful thus far and that the termination was solely a budgetary concern.

"We were very confident in the VIPER team. This really gets down to cost and a very constrained budget environment in the United States," said Joel Kearns, deputy associate administrator for exploration at NASA headquarters in Washington, during today's teleconference. 

"First and most important, this is in no way a reflection on the quality of the work from the mission team that are working to build this rover," said Nicola Fox, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate. "They have worked diligently, including through the pandemic, to be able to build this rover to look for water on the moon.

"This is a very tough decision, but it is a decision based on budgetary concerns in a very constrained budget environment," Fox added at the end of the teleconference.

NASA's VIPER robotic moon rover stands taller than ever after engineers integrated its mast in a clean room at the agency's Johnson Space Center in Houston.  (Image credit: NASA/Helen Arase Vargas)

At the time of its cancellation, the car-sized VIPER was completely assembled and undergoing environmental testing to ensure the rover could handle the physical stresses of launch and the harsh environment of space. 

NASA is now looking to "potentially de-integrate and reuse VIPER scientific instruments and components for future moon missions" Kearns said today, but will first ask both U.S. and international industry partners for any interest in using the rover as-is.

Artist's illustration of NASA's ice-hunting VIPER rover exploring the moon. (Image credit: NASA/Daniel Rutter)

Despite the VIPER program's end, NASA is confident that its same science objectives can be accomplished through future lunar exploration initiatives.

NASA's upcoming Lunar Terrain Vehicle, for example, which is designed to carry astronauts on the moon, is designed to also be operated remotely so that it might be able to explore permanently shadowed regions near the lunar south pole in search of ice.

Other lunar landers might also be able to send instruments similar to those planned for VIPER to the same areas. "We're looking at the possibility for being able to send CLPS landers either into permanently shadowed regions, or to have CLPS landers provide some type of mobility that would get the instruments in the permanently shadowed regions," Kearns said during today's teleconference. 

"So we believe that, over time, we are going to be able to address the science objectives that we originally identified specifically for VIPER."

NASA's fiscal year 2025 budget has forced agency leadership to make difficult decisions about many other ambitious science programs. Funding for the agency's science programs as a whole was reduced by $1 billion for 2025, Fox said today. That reduction is forcing NASA's Science Mission Directorate to "have to make some pretty tough choices," Fox said during a separate teleconference concerning the agency's budget in March.

Other programs facing tough choices could have far-reaching impacts on NASA's science and astronomy missions. The Chandra X-ray telescope is facing a dark future (literally) as its budget has been axed significantly, falling from $41.1 million in 2025 to only $5.2 million in 2029. The ambitious Mars Sample Return program is also now seeking alternative concepts of operation after its price tag ballooned to over $11 billion, drawing Congressional ire.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Brett Tingley
Managing Editor, Space.com

Brett is curious about emerging aerospace technologies, alternative launch concepts, military space developments and uncrewed aircraft systems. Brett's work has appeared on Scientific American, The War Zone, Popular Science, the History Channel, Science Discovery and more. Brett has English degrees from Clemson University and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. In his free time, Brett enjoys skywatching throughout the dark skies of the Appalachian mountains.

  • Unclear Engineer
    This is disappointing.

    The U.S. seems to be cutting back on space technology in multiple ways. China will definitely pick up the slack, and other countries will see it to their advantage to quit Artemis and sign-on to China's space station and moon landing and probably moon base projects.

    If U.S. private/commercial projects don't keep up with China, the U.S. will soon be considered "second rate" in space technology.

    The thing that really hurts is that this budget problem is mainly due to the interest payments on the U.S. national debt. See , https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/national-debt/ which states:
    "As of June 2024 it costs $868 billion to maintain the debt, which is 17% of the total federal spending in fiscal year 2024."

    In effect, all of those "stimulus" and "debt forgiveness" programs are taking the money out of the U.S. space program. And, that is happening under both political parties, often with "bipartisan" support of the bills doing it.
    Reply
  • George²
    Unclear Engineer said:
    This is disappointing.

    The U.S. seems to be cutting back on space technology in multiple ways. China will definitely pick up the slack, and other countries will see it to their advantage to quit Artemis and sign-on to China's space station and moon landing and probably moon base projects.

    If U.S. private/commercial projects don't keep up with China, the U.S. will soon be considered "second rate" in space technology.

    The thing that really hurts is that this budget problem is mainly due to the interest payments on the U.S. national debt. See , https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/national-debt/ which states:
    "As of June 2024 it costs $868 billion to maintain the debt, which is 17% of the total federal spending in fiscal year 2024."

    In effect, all of those "stimulus" and "debt forgiveness" programs are taking the money out of the U.S. space program. And, that is happening under both political parties, often with "bipartisan" support of the bills doing it.
    I never managed to read the reasons for such a significant cost overrun for this small self-propelled vehicle.
    Reply
  • ChrisA
    So that spent $450 million and only needed $85M to finish the project. Then, to save money they toss the $450M in the trash.

    They waste $450M to save $85M. ONLY the government would even concider such a stupid plan.
    Reply
  • Barsoom
    Perhaps NASA ought to be considering the ASTROLAB rover with respect to its ability to perform on that contract. It’s still dependent on private sector funding.
    Reply
  • Barsoom
    ChrisA said:
    So that spent $450 million and only needed $85M to finish the project. Then, to save money they toss the $450M in the trash.

    They waste $450M to save $85M. ONLY the government would even concider such a stupid plan.

    Perhaps NASA ought to be considering the ASTROLAB rover with respect to its ability to perform on that contract. It’s still dependent on private sector funding which = risk
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    The article says that the "launch costs" for the VIPER were not included in the $85M "saved" by cancelling the project.

    It would be helpful to know what the additional costs were besides those covered by the $85M.
    Reply
  • George²
    Unclear Engineer said:
    It would be helpful to know what the additional costs
    Insurance?
    Reply
  • WhatNoTurkey
    They're scraping up money to spend on other priorities. We ought to defund other projects, maybe artistic ones instead of scientific ones. We all have to prioritize and economize.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    From that "other website", here is the answer to my question about what other costs were saved or potentially saved:

    "The rover is now complete, but is only now starting environmental testing. Kearns said the revised cost and schedule assumed that VIPER would get through that environmental testing without any problems. “I will you tell you that in general, spacecraft development system-level environmental testing does uncover problems that do need to be corrected, which would take more time and money.”

    "Canceling VIPER now will save NASA a minimum of $84 million. That could grow, he said, if VIPER’s launch were to slip beyond November 2025, which would require waiting 9 to 12 months until the right lighting conditions return at the landing site in the polar region."

    A lot of the cost overruns were attributed to delays in getting components due to the COVID pandemic disruptions.
    Reply