NASA orbiter spies Japan's struggling SLIM moon lander on lunar surface (photo)
NASA's images show SLIM's landing site both before and after the probe's touchdown.
A NASA orbiter caught sight of Japan's SLIM moon lander on the lunar surface after its historic touchdown.
SLIM, or the Smart Lander for Investigating Moon, is operated by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). It touched down on the moon in a precision landing on Jan. 19, making Japan the fifth country to make a soft landing on the lunar surface behind India, China, the United States and Russia (then the Soviet Union).
From its orbit 50 miles (80 km) above the moon's surface, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) was able to see SLIM resting at its landing site. "Bright streaks on the left side of the image are rocky material ejected from the nearby, relatively young Shioli crater," NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, which manages LRO, wrote in a statement.
Related: Japan's SLIM moon lander photographed on the lunar surface — on its nose (image)
NASA's images show SLIM's landing site both before and after the probe's touchdown. One of the images, seen below, is a composite that removes features that are the same in both the before-landing and after-landing images. In turn, it allows us to see changes in reflectance on the lunar surface, caused by the lander's engine exhaust, to stand out.
SLIM accomplished its main goal of landing at a chosen site with near-pinpoint accuracy, touching down within 328 feet (100 meters) of its target despite ending up upside down due to an engine failure during descent.
Because of its orientation, SLIM is unable to use its solar panels to generate electricity, meaning the probe is relying fully on its battery. On Monday (Jan. 21), the lander's battery dipped to 12% capacity, triggering a power down "to avoid being unable to restart for a recovery operation due to over-discharge," SLIM team members stated on X.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Nevertheless, JAXA scientists are hopeful that, if sunlight shines on the lander from the lunar west, SLIM's solar panels might be able to absorb enough sunshine to generate power and recover.
It's not all bad news, though. In addition to sticking its landing, SLIM was able to deploy two mini-rovers it carried to the moon, called EV-1 ("Lunar Excursion Vehicle" 1) and LEV-2. Both are operating as planned, and the ball-like LEV-2 was even able to snap a picture of its upside-down host.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Brett is curious about emerging aerospace technologies, alternative launch concepts, military space developments and uncrewed aircraft systems. Brett's work has appeared on Scientific American, The War Zone, Popular Science, the History Channel, Science Discovery and more. Brett has English degrees from Clemson University and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. In his free time, Brett enjoys skywatching throughout the dark skies of the Appalachian mountains.
-
oldfart Can't believe they designed a probe that doesn't self right, and the rover doesn't have the energy to push it upright. Massive design failReply -
Rob77
Not so easy to design and test a probe in vacuum of space where we cant realistically test designs here on on Earth with gravity. Personally id like to see a probe able to be flown manually like a drone - there's about 3 seconds of latency I believe from here to the moon. If a probe is not orientating correctly or trajectory isn't quite right you would think it could be flown manually for a period. So many probes crashing into moon shows even computer driven trajectories are somewhat unreliable.oldfart said:Can't believe they designed a probe that doesn't self right, and the rover doesn't have the energy to push it upright. Massive design fail -
billslugg The probe landed on its back because of a thruster failure. Making any probe self righting would be cost prohibitive. What we need is thrusters that don't die at the wrong moment.Reply -
yaduff
Agreed!oldfart said:Can't believe they designed a probe that doesn't self right, and the rover doesn't have the energy to push it upright. Massive design fail