Rare red asteroids around Neptune could reveal the secrets of the early solar system

Telescope images of Neptune's rare red asteroids taken with taken with the Palomar 200-inch, Gemini and Keck telescopes (Image credit: Dr Bryce Bolin)

Neptune is famously a vivid blue, but the asteroids orbiting near it are decidedly not.

An international team of astronomers recently took a peek at Neptune's Trojan asteroids and found that they all seem to be some shade of red — far redder than most asteroids in the solar system. They published their results on Feb. 14 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters.

The Neptunian Trojans are a cloud of asteroids whose orbit around the sun parallels Neptune's. They hang out in the gravitationally stable points between Neptune and the sun, or between Neptune and the dwarf planet Pluto. First discovered in 2001, fewer than 50 of these rocky bodies have been described to date. 

The reason for this is not that Neptunian Trojans are rare; it's probably because it's difficult to spot space rocks that are so small and far away. These asteroids tend to be 31 to 62 miles (50 to 100 kilometers) across and orbit at a distance of 2.8 billion miles (4.5 billion km) from the sun. Prior to this research, astronomers had studied only a baker's dozen of these asteroids and had to use some of Earth's largest and most powerful telescopes to do it. 

"In our new work, we have more than doubled the sample of Neptunian Trojans studied with large telescopes," Bryce Bolin, an astronomer at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center and lead author of the study, said in a statement.

Telescope images of Neptune's rare red asteroids taken with taken with the Palomar 200-inch, Gemini and Keck telescopes (Image credit: Dr Bryce Bolin)

Bolin's team synthesized data collected by four telescopes — the Palomar Observatory telescope in California, the Gemini North and South telescopes in Hawaii and Chile and the Keck telescope in Hawaii — over two years. Researchers tracked 18 Neptunian Trojans and analyzed their color. They found that most were significantly redder than most asteroids, including four that were extremely red.

That crimson color indicates that the Neptunian Trojans are rich in volatile compounds such as ammonia and methanol. Ices made of these chemicals are very sensitive to heat and will rapidly turn to gas when exposed to enough solar radiation. Because of this, astronomers expect asteroids closer to the sun to have far less of a red tinge; their ammonia and methanol have already boiled away. 

Sure enough, researchers have observed a sort of ombré progression of red asteroids, starting with slate gray rocks in the inner solar system and working out to dark red beyond Pluto's orbit.   

It's likely that some of Neptune's reddest asteroids formed even farther from the sun in the solar system's early days, before migrating inward and getting caught in Neptune's orbit, the researchers added. Studying them could open a window into how asteroids in the early solar system formed and how their composition has changed over the past 4.6 billion years.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

  • rod
    "It's likely that some of Neptune's reddest asteroids formed even farther from the sun in the solar system's early days, before migrating inward and getting caught in Neptune's orbit, the researchers added. Studying them could open a window into how asteroids in the early solar system formed and how their composition has changed over the past 4.6 billion years."

    My note. It is very difficult to model the postulated, protoplanetary disc using the solar nebula model. There are a variety of changes to the MMSN found in different models and simulations. An example is a 1977 MMSN model and the amount of mass in earth masses proposed in the ecliptic.

    The Distribution of Mass in the Planetary System and Solar Nebula, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977Ap%26SS..51..153W/abstract
    The arXiv paper, https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1977Ap%26SS..51..153W, 19-Feb-1977. The table in the paper shows MMSN values 0.01 to 0.07 solar masses and disk mass distribution for the planets so they can evolve from the disk. Total disk mass ranges 0.01 to 0.07 solar masses, 3.329428E+03 (3329.428) earth masses up to 2.330599E+04 (23305.99) earth masses in the protoplanetary disk said to evolve into the solar system we see today. The 1977, six-page paper at the end “4. Conclusions” indicates the MMSN creates an anomalously low mass region for Mercury, Mars, and the asteroids. Some values for the MMSN range 0.01 to 0.1 solar masses in the disk. 0.1 solar mass disk = 3.329428E+04 (33,294.28) earth masses. Much work is done now to refine the MMSN, dust, gas, and mass distribution in the postulated protoplanetary disk that creates the solar system we see today using a timescale of some 4.5 billion years or so. Comparing the 1977 MMSN to present day ALMA disk observations should be interesting too. Looks like much juggling takes place to get the protoplanetary disk to fall into place and create the solar system we see today. When I read the more current computer simulation models and reports like phys.org publishes or sometimes, space.com, I look for tables like the 1977 paper disclosing disk mass for different regions used in the simulations to create the solar system. Hard to find such clarity it seems.
    Reply