Rogue planets: hunting the galaxy's most mysterious worlds
This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
Jacco van Loon, Astrophysicist and Director of Keele Observatory, Keele University
Most known planets orbit a star. These planets, including Earth, benefit from the star’s warmth and light. And it is the light emitted from these stars which makes it possible for us to see them. But there are also “invisible” planets, hidden from our gaze, which float, abandoned, through the cosmos. These dark, lonely worlds have no star to orbit, no light in which to bask, no warmth to be radiated by. They are the “rogue” planets – and astronomers have just found a new one, roughly the same size as Earth.
Planets are made from the debris left over after the birth of a star. These planets circle the young star in a thin disc of grains and gas and grow when these small particles stick and pull each other together until they clear their immediate surroundings. Things are chaotic in this world and collisions between planetary embryos, or proto-planets, are common. Stars tend not to form alone, but in clusters of hundreds or thousands at once, and encounters between their nascent planetary systems cause further havoc.
Young Earth is thought to have been hit by a Mars-sized body, knocking out enough material to form the Moon. But some planets faced a darker future: they were knocked out altogether, destined for a life in the vast coldness of space between the stars. These are the free-floating “rogue planets”.
When planets are still very young, say just a few million years old (Earth is more than 4.5bn years old) they are still warm from their formation and from the energy released by their continued gravitational contraction and radio activity in their cores. Large examples of such young but free-floating planets (think of a baby Jupiter) have been seen directly in regions where stars had just formed. But finding smaller rogue planets proved almost impossible until “lensing” was discovered.
Gravitational lensing
Anything with mass bends space and causes light to deflect from a straight path. The result is that an object with mass focuses the light from a source behind it – amplifying it like a huge magnifying glass. This is called gravitational lensing. It was predicted by Einstein’s general theory of relativity and was first verified when stars were seen to be displaced from their usual positions when viewed close to the Sun while it was perfectly eclipsed by the Moon in 1919.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
The effect of gravitational lensing has been observed in galaxies made up of trillions of stars, caused by the vast amounts of stuff in between galaxies and by stars lining up with other stars in the background. One observation was caused by a black hole in a “nearby” massive galaxy called Messier 87, in 2019. So even an “invisible” rogue planet could act as a gravitational lens – or micro-lens, as they can be so small.
One such “micro-lensing” event was attributed to the new rogue planet, called OGLE-2016-BLG-1928. The sighting of the amplification of the light from an inconspicuous star in the dense inner regions of the Milky Way galaxy only lasted 42 minutes.
This meant it had to be a small object and the estimated mass left no doubt that it had to be a planet not much different in size from Earth. The lensing planet was not found to be associated with a star. Lensing rogue planets have been found before, but this is one of the most convincing cases. As well as being the one most akin to Earth, OGLE-2016-BLG-1928 is also the smallest rogue ever found.
Could Earth go rogue?
Large numbers of rogue planets criss-crossing our galaxy raise intriguing questions. Could life have formed and survived, or settled on such worlds? Perhaps technologically advanced civilisations could overcome the inconveniences of eternal darkness and an ice age with no comparison in Earth’s long and varied history? Maybe they harnessed nuclear power or became entirely non-biological?
That may sound like science fiction, but what are the chances of Earth running into such a planet by chance? This is not inconceivable. Only in the last couple of years, rogue asteroids such as Oumuamua and rogue comets such as Borisov whizzed through our solar system. It is unlikely a rogue planet would pass by us that close up. But it’s not beyond the realms of probability.
Earth has so far escaped banishment from the Sun. But one day, in about 4bn years, Earth too could go rogue. Because as the Sun ages, swells up and blows half of itself into space, Earth will either be swallowed by it, or be forced away. But it is unlikely to escape its gravitational attraction altogether. So as the dead Sun is degraded to a smouldering white dwarf, the Earth will face a similar fate to those other dark, cold worlds. Not entirely alone, but far away from the once warm and bright orbit of its star.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Follow all of the Expert Voices issues and debates — and become part of the discussion — on Facebook and Twitter. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
-
rod The article reported "One such “micro-lensing” event was attributed to the new rogue planet, called OGLE-2016-BLG-1928. The sighting of the amplification of the light from an inconspicuous star in the dense inner regions of the Milky Way galaxy only lasted 42 minutes."Reply
Here is a paper on the object reported, 'A Terrestrial-mass Rogue Planet Candidate Detected in the Shortest-timescale Microlensing Event', https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/abbfad, "Abstract Some low-mass planets are expected to be ejected from their parent planetary systems during early stages of planetary system formation. According to planet formation theories, such as the core accretion theory, typical masses of ejected planets should be between 0.3 and 1.0 M ⊕..."
My observation. The mass of this lens event is not well determined, including the distance measurement from Earth. The arXiv paper says "If the lens is located in the Galactic disk (pirel ~ 0.1 mas), then M ~ 0.3Mearth (which is approximately three Mars masses). The lens located in the Galactic bulge (typically pirel ~ 0.016 mas) would be more massive (M ~ 2 Mearth)...The discovery of OGLE-2016-BLG-1928 demonstrates that current microlensing surveys are capable of finding extremely -short-timescale events. Although the mass of the lens cannot be unambiguously measured, properties of the event are consistent with the lens being a sub-Earth-mass object with no stellar companion up to the projected distance of ~ 8 au from the planet. Thus, the
lens is one of the best candidates for a terrestrial-mass rogue planet detected to date. This population of low-
mass free-floating (or wide-orbit) planets may be further explored by the upcoming microlensing experiments."
Rogue planets floating around lose in the Milky Way is very interesting and indicates the model(s) for planet formation via gas cloud collapse and protoplanetary disk accretion is a messy paradigm for creation. Recent reports supporting SETI promoting 300 million or more habitable earth like worlds in the Milky Way, need some rethinking in light of free-floating rogue planets, likely reduces the quantity *created* :) https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/kepler-retrospective-earth-like-planets-common/