Identity-Switching Neutrinos Could Reveal Why We Exist At All. But Can We Find Them?

High-energy particle collisions, neutrinos.
High-energy particle collisions, neutrinos. (Image credit: Shutterstock)

For years now, an international team of researchers has hidden themselves deep beneath a mountain in central Italy, tirelessly collecting the most sensitive measurements from the coldest cubic meter in the known universe. The scientists are searching for evidence that ghostly particles called neutrinos are indistinguishable from their own antimatter counterparts. If proved, the discovery could resolve a cosmic conundrum that has plagued physicists for decades: Why does matter exist at all?

They've long known that matter has an evil twin dubbed antimatter. For every fundamental particle in the universe, there exists an antiparticle that's nearly identical to its sibling, with the same mass but opposite charge. When a particle and antiparticle meet face-to-face, they annihilate each other, creating pure energy. 

"We have this apparent complete symmetry of accounting between matter and antimatter," Thomas O'Donnell, a professor of physics at Virginia Tech University, told Live Science. "Every time you make a piece of matter, you also make a balancing piece of antimatter, and every time you destroy a piece of matter, you must destroy a piece of antimatter. If this is true, you can never have more of one type than the other."

Related: Big Bang to now: Snapshots of our universe through time

This symmetry is at odds with our current understanding of how the universe began. According to the Big Bang Theory, when the universe expanded from an infinitesimal singularity some 13.8 billion years ago, it is believed that equal amounts of matter and antimatter came into existence. However, when astronomers look out into the cosmos today, the universe is composed almost entirely of matter with none of its evil twin in sight. More troubling, if the Big Bang Theory is correct, then we — yes, humans — shouldn't be here today.

"If matter and antimatter fully obey this symmetry, then as the cosmos evolved, all the matter and antimatter would have annihilated into photons and there would be no matter left for stars, planets or even human cells. We would not exist!" O'Donnell said. "The big question then is: 'Did this accounting scheme break sometime during the evolution of the universe?'"

That question is what O'Donnell and fellow collaborators hope to answer. Over the past two years, their team has collected and analyzed data from the CUORE (Cryogenic Underground Observatory for Rare Events) experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy, looking for the smoking gun that would put this cosmic mystery to rest. 

The little neutral ones

The detectors for the CUORE experiment at Gran Sasso Laboratory were installed in a specially constructed cleanroom to protect them from naturally occurring radioactivity.

(Image credit: Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN))

CUORE, which means "heart" in italian, is searching for evidence that elusive subatomic particles called neutrinos are their own antiparticle, what physicists call a Majorana particle. Neutrinos, which pass like specters through most matter, are extremely hard to detect. In fact, according to NASA, trillions of neutrinos originating from the fiery nuclear furnace of our sun pass through our bodies every second.

The CUORE experiment looks for the signature of Majorana neutrinos annihilating each other in a process called neutrinoless double-beta decay. In ordinary double-beta decay, two neutrons inside the nucleus of an atom simultaneously morph into two protons, emitting a pair of electrons and antineutrinos. This nuclear event, although exceedingly rare and occurring only once every 100 quintillion years (10^20) for an individual atom, has been observed in real life. 

Related: The 18 Biggest Unsolved Mysteries in Physics

However, if the researchers are correct and neutrinos are true Majorana particles (they are their own antiparticle), then the two antineutrinos created during the decay could annihilate each other and create a neutrinoless double-beta decay. The result? Just electrons, which are "ordinary matter." If this process proves true, it may be responsible for seeding the early universe with ordinary matter. Observing this process, however, is another story. Scientists estimate neutrinoless double-beta decay (if it exists at all), may take place just once in every 10 septillion years (10^25).

"The neutrinoless mode is the one we really want to see, it would break the rules, creating matter without antimatter," said O'Donnell, who is a member of the CUORE collaboration. "It would be the first clue to a real solution of the matter-antimatter asymmetry."

The CUORE detector looks for the energy signature, in the form of heat, from the electrons created during the radioactive decay of tellurium atoms. Neutrinoless double-beta decay would leave a unique and distinguishable peak in the energy spectrum of the electrons. 

"CUORE is, in essence, one of the world's most sensitive thermometers," Carlo Bucci, a technical coordinator for the CUORE collaboration, said in a statement.

Assembled over a decade, the CUORE instrument is the coldest cubic meter in the known universe. It consists of 988 cube-shaped crystals made of tellurium dioxide, cooled to 10 milli-kelvin, or minus 460 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 273 degrees Celsius), just a hair above the coldest temperature physics will allow. To shield the experiment from interference by outside particles such as cosmic rays, the detector is encased in a thick layer of highly pure lead recovered from a 2,000-year-old Roman shipwreck.

Despite the team's technological achievements, finding the neutrinoless event has proved to be no easy task. The researchers have more than quadrupled the collected data since their initial results in 2017, representing the largest dataset ever collected by a particle detector of its kind. Their latest results, published on the preprint database arXiv, show they found no evidence of neutrinoless double-beta decay.

The collaboration is still determined to hunt down this elusive double-agent particle. Their results have put a tighter bound on the expected mass of a Majorana neutrino, which they believe is at least 5 million times lighter than an electron. The team has plans to upgrade CUORE after its initial five-year run, introducing a new type of crystal that they hope will vastly improve its sensitivity.

"If history is a good predictor of the future, then we can be fairly certain that pushing the envelope of detector technologies will allow us to scrutinize neutrinos with ever-growing depth," O'Donnell said. "Hopefully, we will discover neutrinoless double-beta decay, or perhaps something more exotic and unexpected."

Originally published on Live Science.

How It Works Banner

Want more science? Get a subscription of our sister publication "How It Works" magazine, for the latest amazing science news.  (Image credit: Future plc)

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Contributing Writer

Tim Childers was a freelance science journalist with a background in physics and science communication. He studied Physics at the University of Colorado Boulder, with his research focused on modeling the dynamics of the accretion disks surrounding black holes. He then went on to do an internship at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center using his film talents to create videos, news stories, and interviews. Nowadays, Tim is an exceptionally curious data scientist who loves using data to tell stories to a diverse audience.

  • rod
    Admin said:
    Scientists are searching for a ghostly neutrino particle that acts as its own antiparticle. If they find it, the discovery could resolve a cosmic conundrum: Why does matter exist at all?

    Identity-Switching Neutrinos Could Reveal Why We Exist At All. But Can We Find Them? : Read more

    "If matter and antimatter fully obey this symmetry, then as the cosmos evolved, all the matter and antimatter would have annihilated into photons and there would be no matter left for stars, planets or even human cells. We would not exist!" O'Donnell said. "The big question then is: 'Did this accounting scheme break sometime during the evolution of the universe?'"

    My note, good to see this report at space.com. Explaining the problem of matter vs. antimatter in our universe is a vexing issue. The report indicates some events to observe may take place once in 1E+25 years or so :) Here is an older report on neutrinos in the Big Bang model, primordial neutrinos not observed in the universe from the Big Bang. Daya Bay: Discovery of New Kind of Neutrino Transformation, "The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment, a multinational collaboration operating in the south of China, has just reported the first results of its search for the last, most elusive piece of a long-standing puzzle: how is it that neutrinos can appear to vanish as they travel? The surprising answer opens a gateway to a new understanding of fundamental physics and may eventually solve the riddle of why there is far more ordinary matter than antimatter in the universe today." This report is from March 2012. If the problem is not solved, our universe we see in astronomy today - should not exist using the Big Bang :)
    Reply
  • rod
    FYI, the problem of matter vs. antimatter and the origin of our universe has been reported on for a number of years. I found this interesting report from 1999 in Sky & Telescope magazine.

    "One of cosmology's greatest mysteries is why we're here at all. One reason is that scientists have yet to explain how matter particles came to outnumber antimatter ones in the ultrahot inferno of the early Big Bang. Had they been present in equal numbers, as the simplest theories predict, matter and antimatter particles would have annihilated one another completely, leaving a sea of pure radiation."

    Ref - Antimatter Finding Has Cosmological Implications, Sky & Telescope 98(4):27, 1999 (October issue). According to a number of reports on the problem, we should not see the universe today according to the Big Bang model :)
    Reply
  • FN Moeller
    Either way, its all from the formation of a subatomic particles and their counter part one of which is less stable. Throw in an infinite amount of time and you eventually get a big bang.
    Reply
  • rod
    The problem with the matter vs. anti-matter issue is this all took place after the Big Bang event, during the nuclear fusion phase or commonly known as BBN. You do not have an infinite amount of time to solve the problem, very short amount of time :)
    Reply
  • rod
    FYI, a source I know sent this note to me about the matter vs. anti-matter problem in the Big Bang model.

    "Baryons are the normal matter particles, mostly protons and neutrons, which comprise most of the known matter in the universe. But the anti-particles (anti-protons and anti-electrons) must have also formed, with the condensation of those normal matter particles. However they are not observed. The lack of observations of the anti-particles in the known visible universe is another serious problem for the big bang. The anti-matter should be present in equal amounts to the normal matter in the universe. But it is not. This is sometimes called the matter/anti-matter asymmetry, or the baryon asymmetry problem. It has become a tuning parameter in the big bang model. That means the theorists do not have a theoretical model that can predict what the asymmetry is, or should be, nor how it allegedly came about."

    I feel that the cosmology department needs to make a full disclosure here.
    Reply
  • FN Moeller
    rod said:
    The problem with the matter vs. anti-matter issue is this all took place after the Big Bang event, during the nuclear fusion phase or commonly known as BBN. You do not have an infinite amount of time to solve the problem, very short amount of time :)

    But you do have an infinate amount of time before the big bang. In my view that was required. If you subscribe to the everything from nothing view of the big bang than that's another story.
    Reply
  • rod
    FYI, Rod is looking at the primordial soup of matter vs. anti-matter that emerged after the Big Bang event. That is a timeline from the Planck time to about 3 minutes after the Big Bang involving BBN. This is a huge problem in the Big Bang model to explain the universe we see today and apparently, not commonly reported and understood very well. A new report is out today on the origin of dark matter, Oddball sexaquark particles could be immortal, if they exist at all
    "After decades of poking around in the math behind the glue holding the innards of all matter together, physicists have found a strange hypothetical particle, one that has never appeared in any experiment. Called a sexaquark, the oddball is made up of a funky arrangement of six quarks of various flavors. Besides being a cool-sounding character, the sexaquark could eventually explain the ever-maddening mystery of dark matter. And physicists have found that if the sexaquark has a particular mass, the particle could live forever."

    My observation, Interesting report and a new particle said that may explain dark matter. Looks like the Standard Model has many interesting particles now. The 3:16 minute video is interesting too. Paul Sutter says how the universe began in the video, "We really do not know" 😊 The matter vs. anti-matter issue (baryon asymmetry problem) among other Big Bang problems, is not yet solved.
    Reply