
SpaceX's Starship megarocket will fly again this week, if all goes according to plan.
The company is planning to launch Starship, the biggest and most powerful rocket ever built, for the eighth time on Friday (Feb. 28), Elon Musk said via X yesterday (Feb. 23).
The 403.5-foot-tall (123 meters) fully reusable vehicle will lift off from Starbase, SpaceX's launch and manufacturing facility in South Texas. The company has not yet announced a target launch time, but you'll almost certainly be able to watch it live whenever it happens; SpaceX has livestreamed all seven of Starship's flights to date.
The most recent flight took place on Jan. 16. That mission was a partial success; SpaceX successfully caught Starship's giant first-stage booster, known as Super Heavy, with the "chopstick" arms of the Starbase launch tower as planned.
Ship, the rocket's 171-foot-tall (52 m) upper stage, was supposed to deploy a payload for the first time on Flight 7 — 10 mockups of SpaceX's Starlink internet satellites — circle much of the globe and then splash down in the Indian Ocean about an hour after launch. That didn't happen, however; the upper stage broke apart over the Atlantic Ocean about 8.5 minutes into flight, apparently due to a propellant leak.
Related: SpaceX catches Super Heavy booster on Starship Flight 7 test but loses upper stage (video, photos)
Starship Flight 7 breaking up and re-entering over Turks and Caicos pic.twitter.com/iuQ0YAy17OJanuary 16, 2025
SpaceX has not yet laid out the mission goals for Flight 8, but they're likely to be similar to those for Flight 7.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Over then long haul, SpaceX aims to catch Ship with the chopsticks as well; this recovery strategy will make inspection and reflight of the entire vehicle quite efficient, according to the company. Musk has said that SpaceX wants to catch Ship for the first time in early 2025, but it's hard to imagine that happening on Flight 8, after the stage suffered a problem on Flight 7.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Michael Wall is a Senior Space Writer with Space.com and joined the team in 2010. He primarily covers exoplanets, spaceflight and military space, but has been known to dabble in the space art beat. His book about the search for alien life, "Out There," was published on Nov. 13, 2018. Before becoming a science writer, Michael worked as a herpetologist and wildlife biologist. He has a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the University of Sydney, Australia, a bachelor's degree from the University of Arizona, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. To find out what his latest project is, you can follow Michael on Twitter.
-
Unclear Engineer This article repeats that StarShip "broke apart", but the next article says that it was intentionally "broken apart" by autonomous initiation of the flight destruction system. That was apparently due to multiple early engine shutdowns due to a fire, and, (I am guessing) deviation from the programmed flight path.Reply
That is a little better news than having it simply break apart from flight forces. -
jan.wolitzky Why do you persist in calling Starship "fully reusable"? In none of its seven flights to date has the vehicle ever been recovered, no less reused. And there's no indication that this eighth flight will be any different. Never achieved orbit, never been recovered, never been reused.Reply -
Unclear Engineer It is a development program designed to result in a "fully reusable" upper and lower stage. So far, only one of the attempts to recover some part of the system has failed (aborted catch attempt for boost in flight #6). The rest of the tests were not planned to demonstrate recovery, but rather to test aspects such as staging, heat shield and airframe design, and flight control software that all need to be developed before attempting to bring the stages back for landings at their points of launch.Reply
Nobody else in the world is anywhere near as close to achieving those goals as SpaceX is right now.
So, why you persist in portraying development test as "failures" is the real question. -
DrJamesLong
I guess you missed the purpose of Starship?jan.wolitzky said:Why do you persist in calling Starship "fully reusable"? In none of its seven flights to date has the vehicle ever been recovered, no less reused. And there's no indication that this eighth flight will be any different. Never achieved orbit, never been recovered, never been reused. -
davein berlin Who knows? If Musk puts up enough rocketry and satellite debris, the resulting high altitude aerosols might slow down climate change.Reply -
DrRaviSharma When I worked on the Apollo Program, we accomplished more on each Saturn V development.Reply
The SpaceX model is rapid fire and thus measure of incremental success is smaller and we do not yet have an orbital reliability of the STARSHIP.
It is necessary for SpaceX to narrow the gap in becoming the orbital reliable option especially since the new NASA options on Artemis might be affected.
As maintained, in my opinion we need two reliable capabilities of reaching Moon.
Wishing SpaceX a success to orbit whether they catch the falcon back on launchpad so focus is on SHIP reaching orbit.
Thanks,
Ravi
NASA Apollo Achievement Award -
FilFil
Scientists fear that all that vaporized aluminum oxide can act as a catalyst in a rapid chain reaction of ozone decomposition.davein berlin said:Who knows? If Musk puts up enough rocketry and satellite debris, the resulting high altitude aerosols might slow down climate change.
What happens when 50K satellites die? | CBC News
Deport Elon Musk as an illegal immigrant. Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink. -
DrRaviSharma The recent pushback by 3 days to March 3 still does not aim at SHIP completing earth Orbits?Reply
SpaceX teams - please achieve full earth orbits with STARSHIP to further qualify it for trip to Cislunar space and eventually may be a less heavy version for Crewed qualification, timeline is not like typical SpaceX!
Do not get hung up on recovery which should be slightly lower concern than achieving stable orbits.
Thanks.
Ravi