NASA cuts 2 astronauts from SpaceX Crew-9 mission to make room for Boeing Starliner crew

two astronauts in spacesuits with visors up, side by side
NASA astronaut Nick Hague (left) and Roscosmos cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov, who comprise SpaceX Crew-9. (Image credit: NASA)

NASA has removed two astronauts from a forthcoming SpaceX mission to make room for two others needing a new ride home from space.

The SpaceX Crew-9 mission will now fly only NASA astronaut and U.S. Space Force commander Nick Hague, and Roscosmos astronaut and mission specialist Aleksandr Gorbunov to the International Space Station (ISS), NASA officials announced Friday (Aug. 30). This will leave two seats empty in the Crew Dragon to bring home NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, who are unable to return to Earth aboard Boeing Starliner as planned.

Original Crew-9 commander Zena Cardman and mission specialist Stephanie Wilson, a space shuttle astronaut, will sit this spaceflight out. But the NASA astronauts "are eligible for reassignment on a future mission," agency officials added in the statement. Hague was originally the pilot of Crew-9, but is now the commander; Gorbunov remains as mission specialist. 

Related: Boeing's 1st crewed Starliner to return to Earth without astronauts on Sept. 6

Starliner is on a historic first test mission with astronauts and reached the ISS on June 6 after experiencing trouble with its propulsion system and thrusters. Following two months of tests and safety discussions, NASA eventually said the risk was unacceptable to return Wilmore and Williams home on Starliner due to uncertainties about how well the thrusters would work. (Starliner should undock uncrewed from the ISS on Sept. 6, to free up its docking port on the U.S. Harmony module for Crew-9.)

The agency considered several options for the Starliner's astronauts' return before electing to launch Crew-9's spacecraft half-empty for an expected February 2025 mission conclusion. This allows Crew-9 a normal half-year ISS rotation and will bring home the Starliner astronauts after roughly eight months in space; the Crew-9 mission was delayed from an initial Aug. 18 launch date to make the necessary changes.

Crew-9's new Sept. 24 liftoff target has more than the usual uncertainty, however. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket tasked to launch Crew Dragon is grounded following the loss of a different Falcon 9 variant that launched a SpaceX Starlink satellite mission on Wednesday (Aug. 28). The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is investigating as well as NASA and SpaceX.

Related: FAA requires investigation into SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket landing failure

Flames bloom from the base of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket shortly after its touchdown on a ship at sea on Aug. 28, 2024. The booster, which had just flown its record-setting 23rd mission, toppled over shortly thereafter. (Image credit: SpaceX)

Crew-9 is Gorbunov's first flight. His seat is under a NASA arrangement with Roscosmos to fly one Russian space agency astronaut with each SpaceX mission. NASA receives seats on Russian Soyuz spacecraft in return, for policy and backup reasons.

Hague, a U.S. Space Force Guardian and former test pilot, has been twice to space as a NASA astronaut with the U.S. Air Force. The first visit was brief, however. He was aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft with cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin on Oct. 11, 2018 that aborted minutes after launch due to a rocket problem. That spacecraft briefly reached space before returning to Earth with the crew unhurt. 

Hague and Ovchinin successfully arrived at the ISS five months later in 2019 on their second try in Soyuz, during a 203-day-long mission. Hague transferred to the Space Force in 2021. With Crew-9, he will be the first active Guardian to launch on a space mission.

NASA spacecraft generally fly with at least one U.S. military pilot aboard. The reassigned astronauts from Crew-9, Cardman and Wilson, are a scientist and engineer by training, respectively. Crew-9 would have been Cardman's first mission and Wilson's fourth, following space shuttle missions STS-121 in 2006, STS-120 in 2007, and STS-131 in 2010.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Elizabeth Howell
Staff Writer, Spaceflight

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 specializing in Canadian space news. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time. Elizabeth's reporting includes multiple exclusives with the White House, speaking several times with the International Space Station, witnessing five human spaceflight launches on two continents, flying parabolic, working inside a spacesuit, and participating in a simulated Mars mission. Her latest book, "Why Am I Taller?" (ECW Press, 2022) is co-written with astronaut Dave Williams. 

  • Philly
    When I look at the downfall of Boeing, it gets me wondering, what will happen to SX in 25-40 years when Elon is out of the picture? Will the bean counters start, maximizing profits by cutting corners? Elon is the exception not the rule, in the billionaire Boyz space club. Looks at Bezos for whom space just seems like a part-time hobby.

    BO has been around for 25 years and still is yet to place a single thing into orbit. I know supposedly they are close, go ahead and call me skeptical about hitting their launch date. But their track record is, what it is.

    Expecting NG to land and reuse their 1st stage booster all on their 1st attempt seems wildly optimistic. Unless I am mistaken I have yet to see even a single static fire or full propellant load of the fully stacked NG. But it is supposed to launch in about 1 month? There is no way they are getting a FAA license, without live testing of the launch infrastructure and giving the FAA time to review everything fully. I think 6 months out from today, is very optimistic. Maybe I missed the live tests?

    It is a massive disappointment, I really thought SX and BO would both be pushing each other hard to innovate and drive down the costs. A SX monopoly isn't good for anyone. See my 1st concern in about 25-40 years, when profits start to be the only objective.
    Reply