SpaceX has dreamed up a Dragon ship on steroids to drag the ISS out of space
The super-sized Dragon spacecraft has a larger trunk and a whopping 46 Draco engines to send the ISS to a fiery doom.
SpaceX's new vehicle to bring down the International Space Station will be a monster.
The SpaceX deorbit vehicle, a variant of its workhorse Dragon spacecraft, will carry 46 Draco thrusters to send the International Space Station (ISS) to its end in the south Pacific Ocean in the next decade, the company said in remarks last week. That's triple the usual 16 on board Cargo Dragon missions to the ISS, according to SpaceX.
"The vehicle design will build upon SpaceX's Dragon cargo spacecraft, with an enhanced trunk section that will host propellant tanks, engines, avionics, power generation and thermal hardware tailored to complete this mission," Sarah Walker, SpaceX's director of Dragon mission management, said in a July 17 press conference.
While the ISS remains in good health, NASA is already planning for the end. Early-stage funding of new commercial space stations aims to have them take over the ISS role of fostering low-Earth research, and hosting astronauts. When that happens is still in flux; while most of the ISS consortium is prepared to go until 2030, the agency has emphasized it will only deorbit the six-bedroom complex when the commercial successors are ready.
Earlier this year, NASA awarded SpaceX a $843 million contract to build the Dragon deorbit vehicle to send the ISS to its doom.
Related: ISS could 'drift down' for a year before SpaceX vehicle destroys it
Cargo Dragon has been flying uncrewed ISS resupply missions since 2012, while Crew Dragon has been sending astronauts to space since 2020. It's no accident that SpaceX plans its new vehicle based on these.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
"One of the benefits of leveraging Dragon's rich flight history is that we can continue to use NASA-certified hardware for a number of the key systems, like the docking system and propulsion system components," Walker said.
The ISS is expected to gradually fall back to Earth for about 12 to 18 months before the final deorbit burn is ordered, so that it is closer to our planet. The vehicle will fire between 22 and 26 engines at the same time, Walker said. The contract calls for a speed of roughly 57 meters per second (187 feet per second). That's just over 127 mph (205 kph).
Providing that kind of impulse will take a larger Dragon, a one-off designed especially for this unique mission. The trunk section that provides propulsion, electricity and other vital items will be twice as large alone as a standard cargo Dragon trunk, Walker said. "This vehicle is needing a ton of propellant, a ton of engines to provide a lot of thrust to push the ISS," she said.
"There's also a number of complexities that come with actually pulling off a mission like this," Walker said. "One example is … it has to be continuing to operate in a different environment than we're used to: operating while pushing ISS with all of its appendages, right when they are having increasing drag on them [due to Earth's atmosphere]. And those cannot stop it from its mission of getting it to the target location."
While NASA is responsible for the U.S. segment of the ISS, ultimately each of the participating space agencies takes responsibility for its own portion of the orbiting complex, Weigel said. The other major modules come from Roscosmos, the European Space Agency and the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency while the Canadian Space Agency has robotics.
Related: NASA, SpaceX look to extend lifespan of Crew Dragon spacecraft
The south Pacific Ocean is one of the prime locations for the ISS modules SpaceX will deorbit, although NASA has not yet decided exactly where the complex will come down. Most of the chunks should safely burn up in Earth's atmosphere, and there are no plans as of yet to do a salvage mission — which would be expensive — to see if there are any items to retrieve for a museum. (NASA and other participating space agencies will pull out things they want to preserve ahead of reentry.)
"We've asked for the U.S. deorbit vehicle to put us in a very, very tight debris footprint," said Dana Weigel, NASA's ISS program manager, in the same press conference. The goal is to distribute the debris over a narrow path of no more than 1,250 miles (2,000 kilometers), using the "very large thrust, and a very hefty burn" that SpaceX's vehicle will provide.
What survives reentry will highly depend on its construction, but agency calculations suggest pieces will range in size from household microwave ovens to typical sedans. "Some things will completely burn up, like the solar arrays," Weigel added. "Other very dense structures — or structures that are kind of buried under structures — can survive."
The timing of the historic burn is expected around January 2031, when the 11-year solar cycle should be at a lull and the Earth's atmosphere at a minimum of "puffing up" due to the sun's activity. "Of course," Weigel noted, "the environment and the behavior of the solar cycle is something that we would watch and adjust dates [for] as we get closer."
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., was a staff writer in the spaceflight channel between 2022 and 2024 specializing in Canadian space news. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years from 2012 to 2024. Elizabeth's reporting includes multiple exclusives with the White House, leading world coverage about a lost-and-found space tomato on the International Space Station, witnessing five human spaceflight launches on two continents, flying parabolic, working inside a spacesuit, and participating in a simulated Mars mission. Her latest book, "Why Am I Taller?" (ECW Press, 2022) is co-written with astronaut Dave Williams.
-
Dr.Mt Hej,Reply
I was greatly saddened to hear NASA will be burning thevISS in atmospheric reentry to have remnants in South Pacific Ocean.
There are 5, perhaps 6 years before it is planned to be decommissioned.
May I suggest the primary schools across the USA, the World... do fund raisers and hold a selection raffle for each school or each county to choose an item that will be sent to ISS as crews depart... making ISS a Time Capsule ISS of Earth in 2020s.
The one or two large probably Spacex, docked, used to push, push, push at each apogee and perigee until ISS has escape trajectory out of Earth Orbit, not to Earth, but aimed at the outer solar system.
It has no time mandates to reach outer solar system. It could be on a go slow and will take 100s of years.
One day in the long distant future, if humans exist, our progeny can find and explore life in what they will refer to as their caveman stone age.
If no humans, in millions of years, the next life form from Earth, or elsewhere, can stumble upon it and have their greatest archaeological discovery.
Let us not Waste this opportunity to have something of our time, set in aspic, adrift in outer Sol solar system.
This endeavour would ignite an entire generation Globally to be scientists! They took part in the farewell to our very first long term outer Sol solar system time capsule.
Please do not do the yank thing of trash, bin, rubbish, destroy it when it is no longer going to be used.
Give ISS a worthy Purpose of Inspiration to a global generation of school children as a Time Capsule of Humans of Earth 2020s.
Thanking you
Michael Jeffrey Turberville
Reading, UK, EU, Earth, Sol, Orion Arm, Milkyway... -
Classical Motion If you’re going to do that, do it right. Trim it down and strengthen it. Remove panels. Install nuc for lots of heat and juice. Add plenty of large and small thruster capabilities. High power radio and radar. A full set of space instruments. And a gravity assist from Jupiter.Reply
Voyager 3. -
Unclear Engineer The trouble with people who have "good ideas" like this is that they want other people to implement them.Reply
If you think about it, would you be willing to take the government payment of $843 million and commit to doing what you propose? If not, then don't expect somebody else to do it for you. -
Classical Motion With the way things are going, maybe a space junk/refurbish company is needed. We got plenty of junk for overhead work. And now we got emergency tows, and recommissioned probes and crafts. And from what I see today, we’re gonna need refueling stations. Avoidance maneuvering is burning up all the fuel.Reply
We need a space service station. Even a bus terminal.
That avoidance usage is going to be a real problem. And change a lot of ratios.
The only solution seems to be disposable sats. A huge disappointment for culture warriors.
My question is where does all the exhaust go? What does it do to our space environment and our atmosphere? -
Classical Motion It's like UE said. We can flap about it all day, but it's the money. Off world activity is expensive.Reply -
Classical Motion Think of it this way. Have you ever owned a salt water boat? How long did you have it? Ha ha.Reply
Figure on 1000 times that for a space boat. -
billslugg
It takes too much fuel. The delta V to get a 250 km orbit is 9,256 m/s. The delta V in the deorbit contract is 57 m/s. To escape from LEO and get to the Lagrange points would require a delta V of 3,212 m/s.IWG said:Why not tow it to a Lagrange Point we might need it later...???
They will spend $830M to get 57 m/s. Towing it to a Lagrange point would require 56 times that, or $47B. As soon as you raise it, let us know. -
mvoziowa 3 x 16 is 48 not 46. Or has 'triple' gained a new meaning of late? Maybe it's poetic license but we're talking science and technology.Reply