Sun blasts out highest-energy radiation ever recorded, raising questions for solar physics

An image of the sun.
An image of the sun. (Image credit: NASA/SDO)

In a record-breaking discovery, scientists detected our very own sun emitting an extraordinary amount of gamma rays — wavelengths of light known to carry the most energy of any other wavelength in the electromagnetic spectrum. This is quite a big deal as it marks the highest-energy radiation to ever be documented coming from our planet's host star. 

Something like 1 trillion electron volts, to be exact.

"After looking at six years' worth of data, out popped this excess of gamma rays," Meher Un Nisa, a postdoctoral research associate at Michigan State University and co-author of a new paper about the findings released Wednesday (Aug. 3), said in a statement. "When we first saw it, we were like, 'We definitely messed this up. The sun cannot be this bright at these energies.'" 

Upon deliberation, however, the team realized that such brightness definitely existed — and it was simply due to the sheer amount of gamma rays the sun seemed to be spitting out. 

"The sun is more surprising than we knew," Nisa said. 

Before you start worrying, no, these rays can't harm us. But what they can do is have a pretty important ripple effect for the future of solar physics. In fact, they have already raised some important questions about the sun, such as what role its magnetic field might play in the newly observed gamma-ray phenomenon.

Related: Scientists may have just cracked the sun's greatest mystery

What an excess of solar gamma rays looks like to the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory Collaboration. (Image credit: Courtesy of the HAWC Collaboration)

It's all thanks to a unique lens on the cosmos called the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory, or HAWC. In short, this observatory, completed in the spring of 2015, is a facility specifically designed to observe particles associated with very high-energy gamma rays and cosmic rays, the latter of which are equally energetic but also mysterious in that they often travel across the universe without exhibiting a clear starting point.

"In this particular energy regime, other ground-based telescopes couldn't look at the sun because they only work at night," Nisa said. "Ours operates 24/7."

HAWC basically uses a network of 300 large water tanks, a press release on the new study explains. Each of these tanks is filled with about 200 metric tons of purified water, and they all sit nestled between two dormant volcano peaks in Mexico more than 13,000 feet (3,962 meters) above sea level. All of this purified water is important because, as high-energy particles from space strike the liquid, the collision results in a phenomenon known as Cherenkov radiation (which you may have heard of if you've watched the TV show "Chernobyl").

Named after 1958 Physics Nobel Prize laureate Pavel Cherenkov, Cherenkov radiation essentially refers to a bluish glow that happens when electrically charged particles move at a certain speed through a certain medium, in this case water. 

Tapping into this concept, HAWC's overall field of view covers 15% of the sky, allowing it to survey a total two-thirds every 24 hour period and figure out the roots of various high-energy particles headed to Earth.

An illustration depicting charged particles hitting the water tanks of the HAWC.

A composite image shows a photograph of the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory in Mexico observing particles, whose paths are shown as red lines, generated by high-energy gamma rays from the sun.  (Image credit: Mehr Un Nisa)

What's normal solar radiation like?

Even though scientists have observed the sun sending out gamma ray emissions before, such observations are connected to incredibly extreme solar events such as super powerful solar flares. The recent gamma-ray discovery doesn't seem to be associated with that kind of scenario.

Within the sun, nuclear fusion processes are also expected to produce these strong wavelengths, however, gamma rays created that way don't exactly make it out of the star — let alone far enough to be detected by Earth-based instruments. 

Instead, most of the time, what we see radiating out from our host star are infrared wavelengths, ultraviolet wavelengths and, of course, visible wavelengths that we can see with the unaided eye. 

For context, one of those visible wavelengths carries an energy of about 1 electron volt. The gamma rays Nisa and fellow researchers witnessed, by contrast, exuded about 1 trillion electron volts. And, there were a lot of them.

The first time scientists observed gamma rays with energies of more than a billion electron volts, according to the release, was in 2011 with NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. But Fermi had a limit. It maxed out at finding gamma rays with about 200 billion electron volts. So in 2015, the new study's research team started collecting gamma ray data with HAWC as this observatory didn't seem to have the same restriction. 

"They nudged us and said, 'We're not seeing a cutoff. You might be able to see something," Nisa said.

Which brings us to the present — the first time we've seen sun rays with energies extending into a trillion electron volts. And, according to Nisa, that does not appear to be the maximum.

"We thought we had this star figured out, but that's not the case."

The paper was published Thursday (Aug. 3) in the journal Physical Review Letters

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Monisha Ravisetti
Astronomy Channel Editor

Monisha Ravisetti is Space.com's Astronomy Editor. She covers black holes, star explosions, gravitational waves, exoplanet discoveries and other enigmas hidden across the fabric of space and time. Previously, she was a science writer at CNET, and before that, reported for The Academic Times. Prior to becoming a writer, she was an immunology researcher at Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York. She graduated from New York University in 2018 with a B.A. in philosophy, physics and chemistry. She spends too much time playing online chess. Her favorite planet is Earth.

  • meaganjcoleman
    The title of this article is misleading as you only have 6 years of data.....
    Reply
  • follow the science
    Can someone please explain the effects of this on global warming?

    https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/atmosphere/transfer-of-heat-energy
    " Most of the solar radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere, and much of what reaches the Earth's surface is radiated back into the atmosphere to become heat energy."

    Cause if the Sun is creating the "global warming" we are gonna need a heat shield in space, or just accept the fact that the climate changes periodically. Remember the " New Ice age is coming" proclamations from the 1970's? Boy were they wrong seeing how the sun is putting out more energy than scientists ever imagined.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    I don't think anybody is claiming that the Sun has just started releasing more energy. It is saying that they have just detected radiation from the Sun that is has some photons at much higher in energy than they have detected before because they now have better detectors, plus they are surprised because their theory does not predict such high energy photons being produced by the Sun.

    Presumably, the total amount of energy released by the Sun did not change, just our ability to detect the energy in the highest energy level photons. So, no expected effect on global warming from this discovery.
    Reply
  • GuyWithMS
    Hey guys, if you have a neurological disease that destroys Myelin these bursts are actually very harmful. I knew we had a spike before I found this article. It hurts. A lot. Tell the sun to cut it out.
    Reply
  • Stateoftheartist
    Well that seems to confirm that fusion is happening in the Corona.
    AND, poses a big problem for anyone wanting to walk on the moon or travel above low earth orbit.
    Lucky our radiation belts are drnsd enough to absorb most of the energy from these or noone would have been able to even go into LEO.
    Explains why the energy spectra of the relativistic electrons and hundreds of MeV protons in the belts are so high too.
    What did Never Any Straight Answers say about Apollo?
    "the sun puts out xrays, but they are soft xrays, no more capable of penetrating a tin foil suit than UV".
    🙄🤣
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    If only we could detect all of the EM spectrum, like we can with the radio spectrum. We have so much more to detect. Really "see" the universe. See all light.

    This narrative and the numbers for this, comes thru several indirectness-es. Several daughter products if I recall. Maybe more now. And there are flux estimates of all these steps.

    In classical theory, hard x-ray and higher, gamma, are mono E pole emissions. Therefore, these frequencies should be discrete, and only in steps......and have NO bandwidth, like dipole emissions(lower than x-ray)have........an analog spread or bandwidth of frequency. Gamma should not do this.

    Mono pole emissions only have one electric pole. It might be a little different than what is proposed.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    There is discrete EM and there is continuous EM. EM emissions from shell transitions are always discrete. However, objects can be heated to where the simple vibrations are sufficient to emanate EM waves. Those vibrations can be at any frequency. A continuous spectrum all the way up to gamma rays..
    Reply
  • Stateoftheartist
    follow the science said:
    Can someone please explain the effects of this on global warming?

    https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/atmosphere/transfer-of-heat-energy
    " Most of the solar radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere, and much of what reaches the Earth's surface is radiated back into the atmosphere to become heat energy."

    Cause if the Sun is creating the "global warming" we are gonna need a heat shield in space, or just accept the fact that the climate changes periodically. Remember the " New Ice age is coming" proclamations from the 1970's? Boy were they wrong seeing how the sun is putting out more energy than scientists ever imagined.
    Actually no. What initiates a midlattitude glaciation for the Northern hemisphere is a warm low sea ice Arctic Ocean into late Autumn and winter.
    The cooling land blasts katabatic winds into the Arctic basin and Norwegian and Bering seas, feeding powerful Arctic cyclones that dump the water vapour whipped up off the ocean, in snowfalls too thick to melt in summer.
    How much this is caused by solar cycles, how much by the interrelated enhanced submarine and subglacial vulcanisim and tectonics, that have just passed their peak of earth moon sun orbital parameter forcing, is unknown.

    What we are sure of, is that a cooling climate cannot initiate a midlattitude glaciation stadia. Or "Ice age" as most refer to it as.
    This would reduce atmospheric moisture and snowfall, and no tweaking of orbital parameters or axis tilt will stop the snow melting at midlattitude in summer. It melts quicker.

    So yes. A stadial glaciation, or "dryas event" is the result of global warming.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    billslugg said:
    There is discrete EM and there is continuous EM. EM emissions from shell transitions are always discrete. However, objects can be heated to where the simple vibrations are sufficient to emanate EM waves. Those vibrations can be at any frequency. A continuous spectrum all the way up to gamma rays..

    I think that there is a physical limit on the dynamic of vibration and/or oscillation. I believe that limit is somewhere in the x-ray range. This is a physical electrical limit. Due to density.

    Mono pole emission is a rotational emission. Charge can and does rotate much, much faster than any vibration. Many multitudes quicker. And it's emission is more like a standard car transmission. When we use a clutch to change gears.

    Every time the charge changes speeds(energy) and the clutch is let out an emission will occur. Whether up or down in gear. Every gear has it's own frequency. They are spin frequency rates....and only certain rates are possible. No mechanism for bandwidth. It's digital.

    Oscillation and vibration is varied by gravity, acceleration and external fields. We use this character in MEMS devices to detect gravity, acceleration and external fields. Bandwidth. An analog scale.

    Charge can not vary with gravity, acceleration and external fields in an analog manner. Only in steps. Discrete steps. No bandwidth. A digital scale.

    If we used charge rotation, instead of oscillation for our clocks........you could realize omnipresent time.

    Of course I'm sure no modern science would consider this.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    The physical limit to the speed at which a paticle can vibrate is the Planck Temperature, 1.4e32 Kelvins. No charged particle can vibrate any faster than that, which puts an upper limit on gamma ray energy.
    Reply