100 years ago, Edwin Hubble proved our Milky Way galaxy isn't alone
100 years ago, Hubble revealed a universe of galaxies that existed beyond ours — but he couldn't have done it without a little help.
If we could go back 101 years, we would encounter a time when scientists still thought the Milky Way was the entirety of our universe. But, if we went back 100 years instead, we would find most scientists agreeing that this isn't true. Somewhere in between, humans realized the universe is much larger than our Milky Way — that the spiral nebulas visible through telescopes were, in fact, other galaxies in their own right. The scale of the cosmos had expanded dramatically virtually overnight.
According to historical records, we have one man to thank for this: Edwin Hubble. That's certainly partly the truth, but he couldn't have done it without the genius of others around him who paved the way for his discovery.
"It's easy to romanticize Hubble and his discovery of the universe beyond the Milky Way galaxy, but his work really stood on the shoulders of a number of people," said Jeff Rich, an astronomer at the Carnegie Science Observatories, in a press conference at the 245th meeting of the American Astronomical Society on in Maryland.
That Rich was presenting the story of Edwin Hubble at the January 2025 AAS meeting was symbolic, for it was at the 33rd meeting of the AAS, a century ago on January 1, 1925 in Washington, D.C., that Hubble's work was officially presented for the first time.
Rich describes the discovery of the universe beyond the Milky Way as being a revelation centuries in the making, discussing how our understanding of our place in the cosmos gradually coalesced in time with new discoveries. The two people whose shoulders Hubble stood on the most, though, were Henrietta Swan Leavitt and Harlow Shapley.
The most important stars in the universe
Leavitt worked at Harvard College Observatory as a "computer" who would analyze photographic plates taken by Harvard's telescopes. In particular, Leavitt would scrutinize images of the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds, and had identified 1,800 variable stars within them. In two papers written by Leavitt in 1908 and 1912, she was able to determine that many of these variable stars had a distinctive period–luminosity relation. In other words, she realized that the amount of time it took for the stars to regularly pulsate and appear brighter and fainter as they contracted and expanded was dependent upon how luminous they were.
This was a vital discovery. Suppose you found one of these variables, subsequently called Cepheid variables. You might not know how far away it was, but based on the Cepheid's period of variation, you could calculate how intrinsically luminous the Cepheid was. Then, all you'd need to do to work out how far away the star is would be to compare its true luminosity with how faint it appeared to be in the night sky. Even today, Leavitt's period–luminosity relation is a key concept scientists use when measuring distances in the cosmos..
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Meanwhile, given his foundational role in Hubble's story, it is ironic that Harlow Shapley didn't believe there was anything beyond the Milky Way. Back at the beginning of the 20th century, telescopes were not powerful enough to resolve individual stars in other galaxies, so spiral galaxies appeared more like spiral smudges, and were referred to as spiral nebulas. Shapley suspected the spiral nebulas to simply be stars forming on the edge of the Milky Way.
Shapley's goal was to measure the size of the Milky Way — and hence the universe as he saw it — by creating the first official cosmic distance ladder. Cepheid variables that he identified in our galaxy were the first rung. Next were RR Lyrae stars, which are another breed of variable star with a similar period–luminosity relation to Cepheids and whose distances could be calibrated by comparing them to the Cepheid variables. Finally, he used the RR Lyrae variables to calibrate the distance to ordinary massive, luminous stars near the edge of the Milky Way.
Shapley determined that the Milky Way was 300,000 light years across, and that our solar system was 50,000 light-years from the center. While today we know the more accurate values are 100,000 light-years and 26,000 light-years, respectively, Shapley's result represented the first use of a cosmic distance ladder. Shapley even took part in the "Great Debate" with fellow astronomer Heber Curtis at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington D.C. in April 1920, which discussed the nature of the spiral nebulas. Curtis argued that the spiral nebulas were galaxies in their own right, but said that the Milky Way was only 10,000 light years across. Shapley argued the opposite.
Hubble enters the fray
Edwin Hubble joined the Mount Wilson Observatory team in California in 1919, just two years after the observatory’s Hooker Telescope, which was the largest telescope in the world at that time, had seen first light.
"[Hubble's] breakthrough was made possible by the 100-inch Hooker telescope at Mount Wilson,” said Rich. “Hubble was able to make his discovery because he had access to this state-of-the-art technology.”
The Hooker telescope was the brainchild of the observatory’s director, George Ellery Hale, and was designed to, among other things, solve the spiral nebulae puzzle, thanks to a generous $45,000 gift from Californian philanthropist John Hooker.
Before we continue, we should also mention one other important character in this story: Milton Humason. Originally hired as a "mule skinner," taking building materials and equipment up Mount Wilson via mule while the observatory was still under construction, he subsequently became the observatory's janitor and then an assistant to the astronomers using it. Humason and Hubble became almost inseparable at the telescope, while Humason made many astronomical discoveries in his own right despite not having a Ph.D., and deserves to share in much of the credit that Hubble receives.
So, with the stage set, Hubble and Humason set to work observing spiral nebulas with the Hooker telescope. In 1923, they succeeded in taking an image of the Andromeda spiral nebula, Messier 31, and that revealed something very special indeed.
"Hubble was so excited about this image that he wrote 'VAR!' on the black and white glass plate, because he had seen evidence of a Cepheid variable," said Rich. That Cepheid variable star became known simply as ‘V1’. "He knew, because of work done by Henrietta Leavitt and Harlow Shapley, that this meant he could measure the distance to a spiral nebula for the first time."
And measure it he did. He calculated a distance of 930,000 light-years, which is less than half the real distance of 2.5 million light-years, but the limitations of Hubble's rudimentary calculation notwithstanding (the cosmic distance ladder is still being refined even today), it clearly showed that the Andromeda spiral existed beyond the confines of the 300,000 light-years that Shapley measured for the Milky Way. Messier 31 was not a spiral nebula. It was a spiral galaxy.
Hubble wrote to Shapley, informing him of his discovery. When Shapley read his letter, he commented, "Here is the letter that destroyed my universe."
Hubble 'leaked' the news of his discovery to the New York Times in November of 1924, which is why the presentation at the AAS the following January, actually given by astronomer Henry Norris Russell and not Hubble himself, was only the official reveal — unofficially, though, people already knew about it.
Today, we take for granted that the universe is filled with galaxies, some spirals like the Milky Way and Andromeda, some giant ellipticals, and others tiny dwarfs. At last count, up to 2 trillion galaxies are estimated to exist within the visible universe. And yet, Rich comments how Hubble's epochal discovery was actually relatively recent.
"One hundred years is not that far away," he said. Indeed, there are a few people in the world even older than that, born in a time before we knew other galaxies existed. "This is really a lesson of how much things have changed and how discoveries can come at us fast."
Today, the photographic plate that captures the Cepheid variable V1, with Hubble's scrawled "VAR!" in the corner, is a precious relic of discovery, the kind of thing a scientific Indiana Jones might go in search of in a thousand years' time. Fortunately, you don't have to embark on quite such an arduous journey to find it. Usually kept under lock and key, the plate has been let out for air and is currently on display for a few months at the Mapping the Infinite: Cosmologies Across Cultures exhibition at the Los Angeles County Museum.
As for Hubble, he didn't stop there. His subsequent tuning-fork diagram of the shapes of galaxies remains a classic teaching tool for astronomers, and even though the evolution of galaxies that the tuning fork depicts is back to front, professional astronomers still use the tuning fork's nomenclature of "early" and "late" galaxies.
Then, in 1929, Hubble revealed that almost all the other galaxies in the universe were moving away from us, based partly on redshift measurements by fellow astronomer Vesto Slipher, and in line with theoretical work by the Belgian physicist and priest Georges Lemaître, who derived what has become known as the Hubble–Lemaître law describing the expansion of the universe.
In the space of five years, we'd gone from thinking the Milky Way was everything, to unraveling an infinite, expanding universe. It was quite the paradigm shift and, coming on the back of Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, released in 1915, and around the same time that the world's greatest physicists, led by Niels Bohr, were figuring out the realm of quantum physics, it was a keystone of a transformative era in science that has shaped our current understanding of the cosmos. With new mysteries such as dark matter, dark energy, the search for a quantum theory of gravity, the Hubble tension and the cause of the Big Bang all perplexing physicists, now would be a great time for another transformation in science akin to that of a century ago.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Keith Cooper is a freelance science journalist and editor in the United Kingdom, and has a degree in physics and astrophysics from the University of Manchester. He's the author of "The Contact Paradox: Challenging Our Assumptions in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence" (Bloomsbury Sigma, 2020) and has written articles on astronomy, space, physics and astrobiology for a multitude of magazines and websites.
-
firewalker114 Another great scientist enjoying a pipe. Einstein was also a well-known pipe smoker. Always enjoy reading about the pioneers of space exploration in articles like this.Reply -
AboveAndBeyond
I was going to say... I don't think I've ever seen a picture of Hubble without a pipe in his mouth!firewalker114 said:Another great scientist enjoying a pipe. Einstein was also a well-known pipe smoker. Always enjoy reading about the pioneers of space exploration in articles like this.
It's interesting that Shapley had been at Mount Wilson when he did his work mentioned here (with the 60") but left about the time the 100" went into operation, to take over the directorship at Harvard Observatory. Otherwise he might have made the discovery Hubble is famous for. -
Helio Hubble, after attending Oxford, took up both the pipe and a British accent.Reply
Hubble deserves the credit to finally ending the on-going debate regarding the "island universe" theory. But many scientists were convinced before his major work.
Here is my chronological work taken from several books that illustrate some of the great astronomy in the past:
1600s – Newton favored the idea of an infinite universe. This implies a universe that of homogeneity – stars and galaxies (perhaps) uniformly spread through the universe. Otherwise, to Newton’s view, the universe would collapse due to gravity.
1644 – Descartes published Principia Philosophiae. Universe has no center and is without limits, but argues that it is unwise to argue infinity but rater use indefinite instead.
1755 – Prussian journalist wrote that the nebulae may be their own “island universe” like the MW.
1763 – Alexander von Humboldt championed Kant’s disk-like galaxies, including the MW , and dubbed them “island universes”. This was “a phrase that would resonate throughout the astronomical community like a mantra…”
1786 – Herschel boasted he had discovered over 1500 new universes, but…
1790 – Herschel changed his view after discovering planetary nebulae.
1790’s – Kant and Laplace gave us the concept of these “island universes” since they appear to be comprised of stars.
1845 – The Earl of Rose, with his Leviathan telescope (6 ft. mirror), discovered that some nebulae were spiral.
1868 – William and Margaret Huggins used the shift in the spectral lines of Sirius to measure its speed (45 kps).
1885 – A nova (SN) was observed in Andromeda, indicating that Andromeda could not be a distant island universe else the nova would be at least 50 million times the brightness of the Sun. This was beyond their comprehension.
1899 – Scheiner argues that M31 (Andromeda) is a galaxy like the MW. He had obtained a photo of the spectral lines of M31. -
Helio 1908 – Henrietta Leavitt publishes 1,777 variables from the SMC and LMC. She further noted that there were 16 in the SMC stating, “It is worth of notice that…the burgher variables have the longer periods.”Reply
1908 – Edward Fath confirmed Scheiner’s findings using the Crossley telescope at the Lick Obs. To him it was unmistakable – the Andromeda consists of a myriad of stars (i.e. a galaxy). He noted that the spectra of Andromeda was about the same as that of globular clusters – both spectra of stars, not nebulae. But he didn’t “push his findings”.
1910 – Hubble found clusters of what he thought might be galaxies. He suggests that if so, they would be millions of lightyears away.
1910 – Curtis, using the Crossley, discovers no rotation in spiral nebulae, when there should be unless, of course, they are extremely distant and large (ie galaxies).
Edington notes that this and other evidence, like apparent size and magnitude, only favors these spiral nebulae as galaxies.
Cambell, dir. of Lick Obs., agrees.
1912 – Puiseux, notes that long exposures reveal more and more spiral nebulae. He favored the view that they are like the MW.
1912 – Leavitt publishes her 25 Cepheids of the SMC. Leavitt stated, “the logarithm of the period increases by about 0.48 for each increase of one magnitude in brightness”.
1912 – After being told by Lowell to study white nebulae (spirals), he improved his 450 lb. spectrograph by 200x!
1912 – Slipher measured, after long hours of exposure times, that Andromeda is moving at a rate of 300 kps towards us. This speed is about 10x that of stars in the MW, strongly suggesting Andromeda is extragalactic (ie galaxy).
1913 – Slipher publishes the first redshift measurements of spiral nebulae (galaxies). Later that year, he showed NGC 4594 had a redshift of 1000 kps.
1914 – Slipher had velocities for 14 spirals. The trend being for redshifts, not blueshifts. Hertzsprung writes Slipher in praise and noted that the results show them to be extragalactic, though Slipher was not pushing them as “island universes”.
1916 – Van Maannen (Mt. Wilson where Hubble worked) claimed that he found rotation in the spirals when comparing movements to older images.
-
Helio 1917 – Heber Curtis, using novae found in a spiral, found their distance to be far outside the MW. He further suggested, based on mag., that they are “of and order of 100 times as far away…”Reply
1917 – Ritchey also found faint novae in spiral nebulae, suggesting distances in the millions of light years. He also noted that they number over 1 million.
1917 -- Slipher at the Am. Philosophical Society gave his report on 25 velocities, after getting his math checked by computer Elizabeth Williams in Boston. Slipher announced these observations were favorable to the “island universe” theory. Slipher also suggested the spirals might be “’scattering’ a precocious intimation of the cosmic expansion.”
1920 – Wolf (at Heidelberg) found a SN in NGC2608 in 1920, showing that it contained stars, thus extragalactic.
1920 – Cosmologies “Great Debate”. Curtis presented his work that the spirals were “island universes”. Shapley presented his view. And where was Hubble in this great presentation moment to favor a universe comprised of galaxies? *cough*
Curtis stated…
1) Spirals displayed the spectra typical for collections of stars, not gas.
2) No spiral had ever been found in the MW.
3) Spirals seen away from the MW due to MW gas/dust blocking views.
4) Novae (not SN) were too faint to not be very far away.
5) Slipher great redshift velocities.
But Shapley also argued that the MW was large and Curtis that it wasn’t. So both had some good arguments.
1922 -- – Opik found, using radial redshifts for his assumed central mass, the distance to Andromeda to be 450 kpc.
1923 – Eddington published his Mathematical Theory of Relativity, 2nd edition in 1924, which included Slipher’s 41 radial velocities. It was reprinted many times and became a textbook. He included Slipher’s redshifts, thus entering mainstream science.
1923, Oct 4th – Hubble discovers a Cepheid in Andromeda. He estimates its distance to be 900k lyrs.
1923 Dec – Hubble, using the brightest star method, measured distance of elliptical (like the LMC) to be 1 million lyrs. -
Helio 1924 – Hubble throughout the years found 12 Cepheids with periods ranging from 18 to 50 days. M33 brought him 22 Cepheids with similar periods. Yet, contrary to all his findings, he was too reluctant to publish due to his “sensitive ego”.Reply
1924 Dec 23 – NYT reported that “…Dr. Hubbell (sic) Confirms View That They are ‘Island Universes’ Similar to Our Own.” Though Hubble had yet to go public.
1925 Jan 1 – Russell read Hubble’s paper at the AAS. 12 Cepheids in Andromeda, 22 in the Triangulum, giving both a distance of about 1 million lyrs. Hubble also noted that the 100” resolved the outer regions around these spirals into a vast collection of stars. James Jean used a different technique to confirm great distances, thus concluding Van Mannen’s rotations must go.
1925 – Slipher had 45 redshift velocities, mostly all from his work.
1925? – “There is not just one universe.” Hubble stated. “Countless whole worlds, each of them a mighty universe, are strewn all over the sky. Like the proverbial gains of sand on the beach are the universes, each of them peopled with billions of stars or solar systems. Science has already taken a census of nearly ten million galactic system or individual universes of stars.”
His talks became famous.
Shapley was tired of the various terms for these “universes”. Hubble preference was extragalactic nebulae. He adopted that they be termed galaxies. Hubble saw no need to abolish “venerable precedence”. It became the moniker only after Hubble’s death in 1952. -
Helio 1925, Jan. 1 – AAS meeting in DC where Russell presented Hubble’s results of Cepheids in Andromeda and the Triangulum nebulae showing their distance using the 100” Mt. Wilson reflector. “had derived distance approaching one million light years for each, thus bringing confirmation to the so-called island universe theory.”Reply
1925 – Lemaitre writes in 1950 that he had met with Slipher and Hubble, and recalls Hubble’s Washington announcement (by Russell sealing the deal on other galaxies).
1927, June -- Lemaitre combined GR theory with the observations from Slipher and Hubble. He showed this to Einstein in the autumn of 1927 getting his negative result, same as the one he gave Friedmann. (p64) But his work was unnoticed until 1930. “Lemaitre is unequivocal, for the first time someone suggests and expanding universe.”
1928 July – Hubble made chair of the IAU Nebulae Comm. for the conference to be held in Leiden, southern Holland. Hubble was able to visit with de Sitter to discuss both cosmology and GR. De Sitter encouraged more redshift distance work since his model predicted the relationship. Slipher had gone as far as he could with his little 24” at Lowell. Hubble would work on finding the Cepheids and Humason, for hours, would image their redshift.
1929, Jan – Baade gave lecture stating that it was Curtis (Lick) and Ritchey (Mt. Wilson) who showed spirals as galaxies, using novae. He also stated that Hubble, with the 100”, improved their work with the use of Cepheid observations. He also stated that Wolf (Heidelberg) had found a SN in NGC2608 in 1920, proving it contained stars, thus extragalactic.
1929 – Hubble Ho estimate = 500 kps/Mpc
1929 – Hubble (distances) and Humason (redshifts) were found for 46 galaxies. He culled this to only 20 for accuracy. He found a linear relationship for speed and distance. maybe, since no one seemed to notice. But Hubble may have never recognized this once it was later revealed.]
Author notes that Hubble never made any effort to acknowledge expansion -
billslugg I didn't realize there was so much "back and forth" between theories. Lots of big egos to deal with.Reply