Moon or Mars? Why not both, acting NASA head Janet Petro says

two astronauts work on the surface of the moon with earth in the background
An artist's impression of astronauts working on the surface of the moon. (Image credit: NASA)

WASHINGTON, DC — NASA still has the moon in its crosshairs.

The agency has been working to return astronauts to the moon via its Artemis program, which was established in late 2017 in response to a directive from then-U.S. President Donald Trump.

Establishing a sustainable human presence on and around our natural satellite will help us make the next giant leap — the one to Mars, NASA officials have long said.

Recent statements by Trump — who was just elected to his second term, and his close adviser Elon Musk have called this "stepping stone" approach into question — however.

In his inaugural address last month, for example, Trump focused on the Red Planet, saying that the United States "will pursue our manifest destiny into the stars, launching American astronauts to plant the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars."

And Musk — the SpaceX founder and CEO whose "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) is currently auditing (and slashing) the federal bureaucracy — deemed the moon "a distraction" in a December 2024 X post, saying, "we're going straight to Mars." (That was apparently a reference to SpaceX's internal plans, not those of NASA. But Musk seems to have Trump's ear on many issues, and SpaceX and NASA are key partners on the Artemis program.)

Nothing has officially changed with Artemis yet, however. Indeed, the moon is still a big part of NASA's human spaceflight plans, according to acting NASA administrator Janet Petro.

Petro spoke here on Wednesday (Feb. 12) at the 27th annual Commercial Space Conference in a "fireside chat" with Dave Cavossa, president of the Commercial Space Federation. Among other questions, Cavossa asked Petro what she would regard as a "defining success" of NASA's collaborations with commercial partners 10 to 20 years from now.

Petro cited a robust network of private space stations in low Earth orbit, as well as "boots on Mars," which she described as a "super exciting" prospect. But she also gave some love to Earth's nearest neighbor: "Many, many, many boots on the moon — that, to me, would be incredible to see."

a man and a woman sit on a stage during a "fireside chat" at a conference

NASA Acting Administrator Janet Petro speaks to Dave Cavossa, president of the Commercial Space Federation, during the 27th Annual Commercial Space Conference in Washington, D.C. on Feb. 12, 2025. (Image credit: Mike Wall/Space.com)

Petro — the first woman to ever lead NASA — steered clear of politics during the 25-minute chat. She didn't discuss DOGE's plans for NASA, for example, or how the Trump administration's anti-DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) push is affecting the agency.

It's unclear how long Petro will direct the agency. Trump has nominated billionaire tech entrepreneur, philanthropist and private astronaut Jared Isaacman to lead NASA on a permanent basis. Isaacman still needs to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate, however.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Mike Wall
Senior Space Writer

Michael Wall is a Senior Space Writer with Space.com and joined the team in 2010. He primarily covers exoplanets, spaceflight and military space, but has been known to dabble in the space art beat. His book about the search for alien life, "Out There," was published on Nov. 13, 2018. Before becoming a science writer, Michael worked as a herpetologist and wildlife biologist. He has a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the University of Sydney, Australia, a bachelor's degree from the University of Arizona, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. To find out what his latest project is, you can follow Michael on Twitter.

  • Classical Motion
    I am certainly no expert but Mars is too far. We need more off world experience and the Moon is perfect for that. The only bad part is that dust.

    The only thing that can profit us is the location and environment for experiment and measurement. We should learn to use it. But it will cost. And no Moon harvest. Or plunder.

    The far side is the only radio quiet area we have left. And that observation time is limited.

    It will take years of logistics to go to Mars. Let’s learn on the Moon before riding on Mars.
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    Classical Motion said:
    I am certainly no expert but Mars is too far. We need more off world experience and the Moon is perfect for that. The only bad part is that dust.

    The only thing that can profit us is the location and environment for experiment and measurement. We should learn to use it. But it will cost. And no Moon harvest. Or plunder.

    The far side is the only radio quiet area we have left. And that observation time is limited.

    It will take years of logistics to go to Mars. Let’s learn on the Moon before riding on Mars.
    Agreed and then there is the matter of resources ($$$).
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Maybe this is a stretch but, we might be able to Moon orbit a rotating space station, with warehouse, crew quarters, fueling and maintenance bays for space taxis, plus a Moon base station…… for the cost of a Mars trip.

    Too much?

    If only we could fine a new stable element with new properties or some other prize. We need a reward.

    Ruff ruff.

    If only that dust was magic.
    Reply
  • Keithrc
    Going to Mars is an order of magnitude more difficult than going back to the moon. Anyone who says that this intermediate step is unnecessary is a dummy.
    Reply
  • George²
    COLGeek said:
    Agreed and then there is the matter of resources ($$$).
    Seems like no problem to spend trillions for making crypto "coins" and for "AI". For wars too.
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    George² said:
    Seems like no problem to spend trillions for making crypto "coins" and for "AI". For wars too.
    Not really relevant in regards to NASA's budget though.
    Reply