NASA's Parker Solar Probe is solving long-standing mysteries about the sun. Here's what we've learned so far.

An artist's concept of NASA's Parker Solar Probe observing the sun.
(Image credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins APL/Steve Gribben)

On Nov. 6, NASA's Parker Solar Probe passed within 234 miles (376 kilometers) of Venus' surface. The purpose of this close flyby was to accomplish a gravity-assist maneuver, in which the probe would steal some of Venus' momentum to change the spacecraft's orbit and bring itself even closer to the sun.

The Parker Solar Probe had already made several close passes of the sun, but the recent flyby was its closest, coming within about 3.8 million miles (6 million km) of the solar surface. That's less than nine times the radius of the sun.

At the moment of closest approach, Parker was traveling at nearly 435,000 mph (700,000 km/h), making it the fastest object ever designed by humans. To give you a sense of just how fast that is, Parker gives us the rare opportunity to switch units: We can reasonably express its speed as 0.06% the speed of light.

The goal of the Parker Solar Probe mission is to investigate the mysteries of the sun's corona, its outer atmosphere. Specifically, for decades, we've known that the visible surface of the sun, the photosphere, has a temperature of around a few thousand kelvins, but the corona itself is in the millions of kelvins.

Related: Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter team up to tackle 65-year-old sun mystery

The goal of the Parker Solar Probe mission is to investigate the mysteries of the sun's corona, its outer atmosphere. Specifically, for decades, we've known that the visible surface of the sun, the photosphere, has a temperature of around a few thousand kelvins, but the corona itself is in the millions of kelvins.

It's like switching on a light bulb, and the bulb is warm to the touch but the air around it is a thousand times hotter. What gives?

We know that the corona can't be heated through normal heat-transfer processes, because that would violate the second law of thermodynamics — the cooler surface can't deliver heat to the warmer corona. So it has to be some other process, and it has to involve magnetic fields, which play a large and dynamic role in the physics of the corona.

Ironically, it doesn't take that much energy to heat up the corona, and that's because of the role helium plays in the calculation.

Helium makes up about 25% of the sun's mass. The temperatures at the photosphere are cool enough that helium, which normally carries two electrons, loses one of them. We call this a partially ionized state. This allows helium to easily pump out a lot of radiation, which contributes to the general glowing of the sun. But it also keeps the temperature in check, because there's an easy "escape hatch" for the sun's heat.

Once things heat up a bit, however, the helium loses its other electron, and it becomes fully ionized. This makes it much, much harder to release radiation, which means it's much better at trapping heat. Solar physicists call this transition "evaporation" through an analogy with boiling water to make steam.

The upshot is that you don't need that much energy — something like 1 kilowatt for every square meter — to heat the corona to ridiculously high temperatures. That's like covering the surface of the sun in dishwashers, which amounts to less than 0.0025% of the total energy emitted by the sun.

This means that whatever we use to heat up the corona, we can be really, really inefficient with it and it will still likely do the trick.

And this is where the Parker Solar Probe comes in. To study this region of the sun, the probe comes with four suites of instruments, named FIELDS, WISPR, IS-O-IS and SWEAP. These instruments work together to study the corona itself, the solar wind (the stream of charged particles emanating from the corona) and the photosphere to compile a complete picture.

And this is how Parker discovered how strange waves of magnetic-field energy called switchbacks play a critical role in heating the corona.

A switchback starts in the turbulent photosphere, where plumes of plasma constantly well up to the surface and slink back down. Sometimes, regions of intense magnetic energy can form, where many field lines tangle up on each other. Some of these fields are straight, pointing away from the sun. Others loop back to the surface in the shape of a giant horseshoe.

When these two kinds of magnetic fields bump against each other, the lines can disconnect and reconnect, forming a giant S-shaped kink in the field lines. This kink, known as a switchback, travels away from the sun and deep into the corona.

Eventually, the switchback dissolves, delivering its energy. Astronomers think this is one of the most important — if not the most important — way the sun heats its corona.

This research is especially important because magnetic fields also control the evolution of space weather, which involves plasma storms that detach from the sun and go flying through the solar system. Space weather has a huge impact on satellites, human spaceflight and even our power grids. So the more we understand about the complex role of magnetic fields throughout all regions of the sun, the better we can predict and plan for solar storms of all kinds.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Paul Sutter
Space.com Contributor

Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at SUNY Stony Brook and the Flatiron Institute in New York City. Paul received his PhD in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and spent three years at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, followed by a research fellowship in Trieste, Italy, His research focuses on many diverse topics, from the emptiest regions of the universe to the earliest moments of the Big Bang to the hunt for the first stars. As an "Agent to the Stars," Paul has passionately engaged the public in science outreach for several years. He is the host of the popular "Ask a Spaceman!" podcast, author of "Your Place in the Universe" and "How to Die in Space" and he frequently appears on TV — including on The Weather Channel, for which he serves as Official Space Specialist.

  • billslugg
    "...in which the probe would steal some of Venus' momentum to change the spacecraft's orbit and bring itself even closer to the sun."

    In the case of using a slingshot maneuver to slow a craft down relative to the Sun, the craft will add to Venus' momentum, not steal it.
    Reply
  • Thermoman
    Admin said:
    The goal of the Parker Solar Probe mission is to investigate the mysteries of the sun's corona, its outer atmosphere. What has it learned so far?

    NASA's Parker Solar Probe is solving long-standing mysteries about the sun. Here's what we've learned so far. : Read more
    I appreciate you post present information but :

    ''
    Specifically, for decades, we've known that the visible surface of the sun, the photosphere, has a temperature of around a few thousand kelvins, but the corona itself is in the millions of kelvins.

    It's like switching on a light bulb, and the bulb is warm to the touch but the air around it is a thousand times hotter. What gives? '''


    Temperature felt as heat is not propagated by space , it is cold around the Sun as the Moon and as mountain tops . Light can only propagate in a medium to produce heat . Without a medium the temperature is zero because light disperses at c !

    Now the Quantum wierdness here , if you put a thermometer near the Sun , the thermometer would burn up and measure a temperature but not because it is measuring the temperature of the space but because it is measuring the temperature of itself , interacting with the dense radiation nearer the Sun .
    Reply
  • Dadou
    Im not sure I understood everything but is there anyway to send something that will help us learn more about more deep into he sun and would it be useful ?
    Reply
  • Dale Holley
    Dadou said:
    Im not sure I understood everything but is there anyway to send something that will help us learn more about more deep into he sun and would it be useful ?
    Not to current knowledge, the strongest heat shield would
    Burn up? Just like touching a hot fire poker
    Reply
  • Helio
    billslugg said:
    "...in which the probe would steal some of Venus' momentum to change the spacecraft's orbit and bring itself even closer to the sun."

    In the case of using a slingshot maneuver to slow a craft down relative to the Sun, the craft will add to Venus' momentum, not steal it.
    Yep. When a craft flies in front of an object, it slows the craft, transferring momentum to the object, as you say.

    This should go into a "NII" section (Not Initially Intuitive). ;) I find there are many such NII things in astronomy, which adds to my interest in it.

    Here's a video.
    Reply
  • Helio
    Dadou said:
    Im not sure I understood everything but is there anyway to send something that will help us learn more about more deep into he sun and would it be useful ?
    Parker will likely tweak the amazing level of science already understood about the Sun's interior. All energy measured begins in the core.
    Reply
  • Aphelion
    Thermoman said:
    I appreciate you post present information but :

    ''
    Specifically, for decades, we've known that the visible surface of the sun, the photosphere, has a temperature of around a few thousand kelvins, but the corona itself is in the millions of kelvins.

    It's like switching on a light bulb, and the bulb is warm to the touch but the air around it is a thousand times hotter. What gives? '''


    Temperature felt as heat is not propagated by space , it is cold around the Sun as the Moon and as mountain tops . Light can only propagate in a medium to produce heat . Without a medium the temperature is zero because light disperses at c !

    Now the Quantum wierdness here , if you put a thermometer near the Sun , the thermometer would burn up and measure a temperature but not because it is measuring the temperature of the space but because it is measuring the temperature of itself , interacting with the dense radiation nearer the Sun .
    You're correct that a thermometer placed near the Sun would burn up, but it's important to note that this is not because space itself has a high temperature. Rather, the thermometer would absorb the intense electromagnetic radiation emitted by the Sun, causing its own temperature to rise until it burns up.
    The Parker Solar Probe is designed to withstand these intense conditions and make measurements of the solar environment, but as you noted, it's important to keep in mind that the concept of temperature in space is not as straightforward as we might expect.
    Reply
  • George²
    Is there any chance, after the main mission is complete, that we can try to get Parker into a trajectory that, using multiple gravitational assists from the Sun and various planets, achieves the highest exit velocity for man made object from the Solar system, or is there not enough fuel for intermediate corrections on the trajectory?
    Reply
  • JThom
    So can we posit that the area between the Sun's surface and corona behaves like a step-up transformer. a cosmic scale EMF induction process converting the (few thousand kelvins of) radiant energy from the photosphere to the (millions of kelvins of) radiant energy/heat observed in the corona which produces the huge level of outward forces of that energy, accelerating particles & other matter away at high velocities.

    maybe there's nothing to physically see. but other types of observations can reveal the complex & constantly changing magnetic interactions that produces the "force field-like" corona.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    George² said:
    Is there any chance, after the main mission is complete, that we can try to get Parker into a trajectory that, using multiple gravitational assists from the Sun and various planets, achieves the highest exit velocity for man made object from the Solar system, or is there not enough fuel for intermediate corrections on the trajectory?
    Parker will have used all its fuel just in getting so far down into the Sun's gravity well, there is now no escape.
    Reply