Expert Voices

Where did the universe's magnetic fields come from?

The magnetic field of the muon has proven incredibly hard to predict.
Depicts the magnetic field of a muon. (Image credit: Newton Henry Black/Wikimedia Commons)

How the universe got its large magnetic fields has remained one of the stickiest outstanding problems in astrophysics. Now, researchers have proposed a novel solution: a giant "dust battery" operating when the first stars appeared.

Magnetic fields are everywhere in the universe. Of course, there's Earth's magnetic field, which deflects dangerous cosmic radiation, wiggles our compasses, and guides flocks of migrating birds. But other planets and stars have magnetic fields, too, and the magnetic fields of Jupiter and the sun are more powerful than Earth's.

Even the entire Milky Way galaxy has its own magnetic field. It's about a million times weaker than Earth's, but it stretches across tens of thousands of light-years, spanning the entire galaxy. Astronomers know of even larger magnetic fields, some of which fill entire galaxy clusters that can reach a few million light-years across.

So where do these gigantic magnetic fields come from? Even though they are relatively weak, they are incredibly large. So whatever created them must have come from suitably energetic, large-scale sources. Over the decades, astronomers have proposed a number of mechanisms, most of which rely on a dynamo process that takes weak "seed" fields and amplifies them to their present-day values.

Related: Earliest magnetic galaxy ever detected offers clues about Milky Way history

But that just pushes the goalpost back even further. Where do the weak seed fields come from in the first place?

In a paper submitted to The Astrophysical Journal in October, researchers proposed a novel solution. Their scenario starts in the cosmic dawn, when the universe was only a few hundred million years old and the first stars and galaxies were beginning to shine. After those first stars died, they left behind bits of heavier elements, which found each other in interstellar space to become the first grains of dust.

These dust grains were generally electrically charged through bombardment with radiation and friction with each other. When the second generation of stars lit up, their intense light shone through all the gas and dust surrounding them. If these stars were powerful enough, their radiation could literally push on the dust grains, causing them to move through the rest of the gas. These moving, electrically charged dust grains would create a weak-but-wide-scale electrical current, like a copper wire 1,000 light-years across.

Because the filtering of radiation through the interstellar gas wouldn't be perfectly uniform, the moving dust grains would tend to clump in some spots and disperse in others. This would create differences in the amount of electrical current from place to place, which, through the laws of electromagnetism, would naturally give rise to a magnetic field.

In the new study, the researchers found that this magnetic field would be incredibly weak — roughly a billionth the strength of Earth's magnetic field. But it would be large enough that other astrophysical processes, like mixing and dynamo amplification, could latch on to that seed field and generate the magnetic fields we see today.

This is only a hypothesis, however. The researchers concluded their work with a recipe to include this mechanism in simulations of the evolution of galaxies and their magnetic fields. That is a crucial step in comparing the full magnetic fields predicted by this theory with the ones we see in the actual universe. We can't rewind the clock to see what the universe's magnetic fields were like long ago, but we can use ideas like this to attempt to reconstruct the past.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Paul Sutter
Space.com Contributor

Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at SUNY Stony Brook and the Flatiron Institute in New York City. Paul received his PhD in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and spent three years at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, followed by a research fellowship in Trieste, Italy, His research focuses on many diverse topics, from the emptiest regions of the universe to the earliest moments of the Big Bang to the hunt for the first stars. As an "Agent to the Stars," Paul has passionately engaged the public in science outreach for several years. He is the host of the popular "Ask a Spaceman!" podcast, author of "Your Place in the Universe" and "How to Die in Space" and he frequently appears on TV — including on The Weather Channel, for which he serves as Official Space Specialist.

  • Classical Motion
    It comes from charge. Charge is 1/2 E and 1/2 M. And unlike E, M can be manufactured beyond what charge gives us. M is analog, while E is digital.
    Reply
  • orsobubu
    Classical Motion said:
    It comes from charge. Charge is 1/2 E and 1/2 M. And unlike E, M can be manufactured beyond what charge gives us. M is analog, while E is digital.
    I wonder whether it is reasonable to ask questions such as the ultimate origin of the universal magnetic field, if quantum electrodynamics theory is still based on idealistic and exclusively mathematical absurdities such as virtual charge and messenger photons.
    Reply