Earth-like planets may form even in harsh environments, James Webb Space Telescope finds
The findings suggest habitable planets could possibly form close to giant, active young stars.
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has found water and organic carbon molecules near a massive, active young star that's situated in a faraway star-forming region of space, suggesting Earth-like exoplanets could form even in the harshest environments in our Milky Way Galaxy. Potentially, some of those exoplanets may even exhibit habitable conditions.
A team of researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA) in Heidelberg, Germany, aimed the mighty James Webb Space Telescope at a star-birthing region known as NGC 6357. The crew's goal was to analyze the chemical environment surrounding the cluster's budding stars and see whether their orbits could possibly host life.
Located some 5,500 light-years from Earth, NGC 6357 is one of the closest regions to us in which we see massive stars currently forming. As these energetic, young stars ignite amid thick clouds of dust, they begin to lash their surroundings with powerful stellar flares and intense ultraviolet radiation, creating unforgiving environments in their vicinity. But the new study found that a planet-forming disk surrounding one of the stars in this cluster contains molecules that are prerequisites for life as we know it, such as water and carbon dioxide.
"This result is unexpected and exciting!" María C. Ramírez-Tannus, an astronomer at MPIA and lead author of the new study, said in a statement. "It shows that there are favorable conditions to form Earth-like planets and the ingredients for life even in the harshest environments in our galaxy."
Related: James Webb Space Telescope finds water and methane in atmosphere of a 'warm Jupiter'
The planet forming disk in question, officially designated as XUE-1, surrounds a star about as big as our sun. But that star’s much larger, and more vicious, siblings are not far away.
Prior to the deployment of the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers could only peer into planet-forming disks located much closer to Earth than XUE-1, which means this disk is now the most distant ever studied in such a detail. Moreover, none of the nearby, previously studied disks live in a cluster containing stars as young, or as massive, as those in NGC 6357.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
These findings are good news for life in the universe as they dispel concerns that potentially habitable planets could not form too close to very massive stars. Previously, scientists thought the intensity of ultraviolet radiation produced by massive stars would interfere with the distribution of dust and gas in planet-forming disks, possibly preventing the formation of rocky planets like Earth, for instance. The NGC 6357 cluster contains more than ten super bright and massive stars, suggesting most of the cluster's matter is exposed to high levels of UV radiation.
"If intense radiation hampers the conditions for planet formation in the inner regions of protoplanetary disks, NGC 6357 is where we should see the effect," Arjan Bik, an astronomer at Stockholm University, Sweden, and second author of the paper, said in the statement.
But the results of Webb's observations showed that the chemical composition of the XUE-1 disk is not too different from those present in quieter parts of the galaxy.
In addition to water and carbon dioxide, the JWST detected traces of carbon monoxide and acetylene in the inner region of the planet-forming disk as well as silicate dust, which plays an important role in planet formation.
The researchers hope to learn more about the possible existence of life in NGC 6357 going forward. They plan to aim the famous telescope at yet another 14 dust disks located in different parts of this harsh stellar cluster.
The new study was published in the journal Astrophysical Journal Letters on Thursday, Nov. 30.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Tereza is a London-based science and technology journalist, aspiring fiction writer and amateur gymnast. Originally from Prague, the Czech Republic, she spent the first seven years of her career working as a reporter, script-writer and presenter for various TV programmes of the Czech Public Service Television. She later took a career break to pursue further education and added a Master's in Science from the International Space University, France, to her Bachelor's in Journalism and Master's in Cultural Anthropology from Prague's Charles University. She worked as a reporter at the Engineering and Technology magazine, freelanced for a range of publications including Live Science, Space.com, Professional Engineering, Via Satellite and Space News and served as a maternity cover science editor at the European Space Agency.
-
rod "The findings suggest habitable planets could possibly form close to giant, active young stars."...Located some 5,500 light-years from Earth, NGC 6357 is one of the closest regions to us in which we see massive stars currently forming."...Reply
The planet forming disk in question, officially designated as XUE-1, surrounds a star about as big as our sun. But that star’s much larger, and more vicious, siblings are not far away. Prior to the deployment of the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers could only peer into planet-forming disks located much closer to Earth than XUE-1, which means this disk is now the most distant ever studied in such a detail. Moreover, none of the nearby, previously studied disks live in a cluster containing stars as young, or as massive, as those in NGC 6357."
My note. Interesting report and how possible earth-like exoplanets could form near massive stars or perhaps near a solar mass star that is in an open cluster with nearby massive stars. The Orion nebula contains the Trapezium but I have not seen reports indicating earth-like exoplanets are forming there only about 1300 light-years away. The exoplanet sites already show some exoplanets documented at large massive stars. Some examples:
V921 Sco b, orbiting a 20 solar mass star, see the exoplanet.eu site. https://exoplanet.eu/catalog/v921_sco_b--7107/
HD 96127 b, 10.94 solar mass host star (nasa exoplanet archive site). https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/overview/HD%2096127%20b#planet_HD-96127-b_collapsible -
ImmortalMelvz Good find, we are going to populate every habitable exoplanet present in the Milky Way galaxy & other galaxies.Reply -
jamestmallow
Or not. It would take 1000s of yrs just to reach our nearest neighbor. Also, the term "habitable" only means there is potential for liquid water. Venus and Mars are in the habitable zone.ImmortalMelvz said:Good find, we are going to populate every habitable exoplanet present in the Milky Way galaxy & other galaxies. -
Helio
I don't see how discovering important ingredients for an Earth-like planet can warrant an argument for habitability. It takes more than ingredients to bake a cake. Nevertheless, finding ingredients is very important. So that's great.jamestmallow said:Or not. It would take 1000s of yrs just to reach our nearest neighbor. Also, the term "habitable" only means there is potential for liquid water. Venus and Mars are in the habitable zone.
There isn't great accuracy in defining a planets habitable zone since only broad strokes are available to science, though smaller brushes are coming to paint better pictures.
I'm aware of four methods to calculate a HZ. Below is a table made using those methods. I don't favor the "Equilibrium Temp." method all that much, however. They do seem to make sense for our solar system, but we know their albedos so we can place them better in our HZ.
The values in the table are the respective location of each in the HZ. A zero percent would place it at the inner edge (hot) of the HZ. A 100% would place it on the outer edge (cold) of the HZ.
A much broader HZ has been introduced to allow for far greater wiggle room. The extended HZ is known as the "0ptimistic" range. I do think that, as you mention, Venus and Mars are likely within this optimistic range, which is not shown in the table.
-
jamestmallow
Also of note is how Earth seems to have a climate stabilizing feedback mechanism. That should extend it's habitability time frame. Dead worlds like Mars lack such.Helio said:I don't see how discovering important ingredients for an Earth-like planet can warrant an argument for habitability. It takes more than ingredients to bake a cake. Nevertheless, finding ingredients is very important. So that's great.
There isn't great accuracy in defining a planets habitable zone since only broad strokes are available to science, though smaller brushes are coming to paint better pictures.
I'm aware of four methods to calculate a HZ. Below is a table made using those methods. I don't favor the "Equilibrium Temp." method all that much, however. They do seem to make sense for our solar system, but we know their albedos so we can place them better in our HZ.
The values in the table are the respective location of each in the HZ. A zero percent would place it at the inner edge (hot) of the HZ. A 100% would place it on the outer edge (cold) of the HZ.
A much broader HZ has been introduced to allow for far greater wiggle room. The extended HZ is known as the "0ptimistic" range. I do think that, as you mention, Venus and Mars are likely within this optimistic range, which is not shown in the table.
-
Helio
Yes, and there are many other factors including magnetic field strengths that may require us knowing in order to refine the real chances for life out there.jamestmallow said:Also of note is how Earth seems to have a climate stabilizing feedback mechanism. That should extend it's habitability time frame. Dead worlds like Mars lack such.
We are in the pioneering age at this point, but it's really impressive to see how far we've come since discovering the first exoplanet less than 3 decades ago. -
billslugg The Earth's magnetic field intensity has decreased 15% over the last 100 years. It does some amount of shielding from solar particles and cosmic radiation. I don't know if this might affect climate.Reply -
Helio
We seem to be learning that shielding is even more important than earlier assumed. No doubt, it plays a role, but it's too early to say for sure. Atmospheric striping, for instance, of unshielded planets like Mars could be a big deal, but if so, how do we explain Venus? More questions than answers. :)billslugg said:The Earth's magnetic field intensity has decreased 15% over the last 100 years. It does some amount of shielding from solar particles and cosmic radiation. I don't know if this might affect climate. -
billslugg Venus has no intrinsic magnetic field. It has an induced field due to solar ions interacting with upper atmosphere. There is also a lot of stripping going on. The induced magnetic field strength is a miniscule 0.000015 that of Earth. Venus has no convection inside, no plate tectonics. I'll guess it is still outgassing enough to maintain an atmosphere.Reply -
rod It is interesting to me that I periodically see and report (edit, read) various reports that proclaim some type of earth-like exoplanet could form here, there or some other places like near O and B stars or perhaps we have an abundance of earth-like exoplanets documented in their habitable zones. Then I run across reports like this where the exoplanet formation models like core accretion or gravity instability are challenged. Still waiting to see confirmation of abiogenesis somewhere in the galaxy here or in our solar system too.Reply
https://phys.org/news/2023-11-discovery-planet-big-sun-solar.html
ref - A low-mass star with a large-mass planet, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adl3365, 30-Nov-2023.
ref - A Neptune-mass exoplanet in close orbit around a very low-mass star challenges formation models, 30-Nov-2023.